Leadership

Participatory Decision Making: A Field Experiment On Manipulating The Votes

Download Now Free registration required

Executive Summary

Many believe that deliberative democracy, where individuals discuss alternatives before voting on them, should result in collectively superior outcomes because voters become better informed and decisions are justified using reason. These deliberations typically involve a moderator, however, whose role has been under-examined. The authors conduct a field experiment to test the effects moderators may have. Participants in a class of 107 students voted on options over their writing and exam requirements. Before voting, they participated in group discussions of about five people each with one moderator.

  • Format: PDF
  • Size: 268.3 KB