Download Now Free registration required
Developing a system design for government projects typically requires a defense contractor to evaluate and make system decisions based on documents such as a Request For Proposal (RFP), Statement Of Work (SOW), and Concept of Operations (CONOP). From these documents, a contractor must assess system alternatives while maximizing the customer's expected system goals, objectives, and capabilities. As with any complex design, there may be competing goals and objectives, so a structured method of evaluating criteria, priorities, and alternatives is needed to support design decisions. The Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) is a commonly used Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) method that can be used to evaluate design alternatives.
- Format: PDF
- Size: 162.6 KB