Date Added: Nov 2010
The authors present evidence from an experiment in which groups select a leader to compete against the leaders of other groups in a real-effort task that they have all performed in the past. They find that women are selected much less often as leaders than is suggested by their individual past performance. They study three potential explanations for the under-representation of women, namely, gender differences in overconfidence concerning past performance, in the willingness to exaggerate past performance to the group, and in the reaction to monetary incentives. They find that men's overconfidence is the driving force behind the observed prevalence of male representation.