Self-Confirming Equilibrium And The Lucas Critique
Source: President and Fellows of Harvard College
The authors examine the role of off-path "Superstitions" in macro-economics, and show how a false belief about off-path play is the key element underlying both the Lucas Critique and the game-theoretic concept of self-confirming equilibrium. However, the impact of false beliefs in these two cases is different: In the Lucas case, a policy maker's incorrect beliefs about off-path play can lead to the adoption of mistaken policy innovation. However, the consequences of such an innovation provide evidence that the belief that motivated them was wrong.
| Format: | Size: | 196.00 | |
| Date: | Nov 2007 |



