Self-Confirming Equilibrium And The Lucas Critique

Source: President and Fellows of Harvard College

Favorite

Free registration required

The authors examine the role of off-path "Superstitions" in macro-economics, and show how a false belief about off-path play is the key element underlying both the Lucas Critique and the game-theoretic concept of self-confirming equilibrium. However, the impact of false beliefs in these two cases is different: In the Lucas case, a policy maker's incorrect beliefs about off-path play can lead to the adoption of mistaken policy innovation. However, the consequences of such an innovation provide evidence that the belief that motivated them was wrong.
Format:PDF Size:196.00
Date:Nov 2007