Apple CEO Tim Cook has drawn a line in the sand with the FBI. In 30 minutes, TechRepublic's Jason Hiner and Bill Detwiler break it down. Join the discussion.
Apple has chosen not to meet the FBI's demands to help reveal the information that is on the iPhone of one of the killers in the December 2015 San Bernardino shooting. Why is Apple being so intransigent and what are the larger implications for the tech industry? That's what Bill Detwiler and I discussed in a special 30-minute episode of the TechRepublic Podcast.
Bill has a background in both technology and criminal justice so I peppered him with questions about the specifics of this issue, the broader legal issues, and the even larger societal questions about freedom versus security.
Now that we've thrown our perspectives out there, we'd like to hear from you. What do you think is motivating Apple? Should the company cooperate with the FBI? Should other tech companies step up and take Apple's side?
Let us know by sending an email to podcast at techrepublic dot com or leaving a voicemail at 646-389-5404. We'll send you a TechRepublic mug and laptop sticker for participating.
To listen to the episode, you can:
- Subscribe to the podcast on iTunes
- Grab the RSS feed of the podcast and drop it in your favorite podcast app or player
- Listen directly on SoundCloud
- Use the player below:
There are lots of great tech podcasts out there. This one is aimed at people who are trying to use technology to get work done, make their businesses and their professional lives more efficient, and improve society. That's a lofty mission, but those are the goals we chase every day at TechRepublic.
If you have feedback about the podcast, ping us on Twitter:
Links to stories relevant to the topic:
- Apple's Tim Cook: We'll fight 'iPhone backdoor' demands from FBI (ZDNet)
- Apple vs. the FBI: This may not be a war Apple can win (ZDNet)
- In legal showdown, FBI vs. Apple could make or break Silicon Valley (ZDNet)
- Apple tells judge 200-year-old law can't unlock iPhones (ZDNet)
- Why are we still talking about backdoors in encryption? No, really (ZDNet)