I recently wrote a two-part series about the basics of Cisco
IP subnetting (“Cisco
IP subnetting 101: Five things you should know”
and “Cisco IP
subnetting 101: Five more things you should know.”
) In response,
several TechRepublic members posted comments in the article’s discussion or
contacted me with questions and requests for more advanced information about IP
subnetting.

So I decided to take advantage of such requests and use them
as fodder for my column. A couple weeks ago, I answered one member’s question
. This time, let’s look at another member’s request
for more technical information.

TechRepublic member Kevaburg offered the following feedback
and requests for more details.

“I think I would have liked to have seen content
showing how taking bits from the host to the network portion of the address
changes the amount of subnets you have.

“A basic discussion of route summarization and a bit
more about CIDR and the roles they play within subnetting would have been more
useful than telling us all what we already know.”

Changing bits on the subnet mask

moving bits from the host to the network portion of the address change the
number of subnets? By taking away bits from the network portion of the address,
we reduce the number of subnets and increase the number of hosts.

This is always the case with a subnet mask. Adding 1s means
increasing subnets and decreasing hosts per subnet. Removing 1s means decreasing
subnets and increasing hosts per subnet.

Let’s look at an example. Say we’re starting with an IP
network of 1.1.1.0 and a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0. In binary form, the
current subnet mask looks like this:

`11111111 11111111 11111111 00000000`

The sequences of 1s represent the network portion of this IP
address, and the 0s stand for the node or host portion. To keep the example
simple, let’s take eight bits from the network portion of the address. So, we
remove the last eight 1s and change them to 0s. The new subnet mask would look
like this:

`11111111 11111111 00000000 00000000`

the network (which we can determine by using the hosts
formula
: 28-2 hosts). With the new subnet mask—which is now 255.255.0.0—we
have 65,534 useable hosts in the network (216-2).

We increased the number of hosts dramatically, but we also
decreased the number of subnets by 256, which we can determine by using the
networks formula: 28. (If we’re using the original
networks formula, 28-2, we would decrease the number of subnets by
254.)

So what are you going to do with a network that has more
than 65,000 hosts? Actually, you’re not going to use all 65,000 hosts.

You could assign it and address it, but at some point, your
network will start to bog down with all the network broadcast traffic—and it
will eventually grind to a halt. In reality, you would more likely use this
reduced subnet mask to represent a supernetted
network, which segues nicely into the second part of this member’s request.

Supernetting a network

Supernetting (also known as route summarization or route
aggregation) uses classless interdomain routing (CIDR) to address a number of
IP subnets with a single route. We call that single route a summarized route or a supernet (in other words, the inverse of
a subnet).

To learn how to supernet a network, let’s look at another
example. Let’s say we have four IP subnets on the four LAN interfaces of our
router: 1.1.0.0/24, 1.1.1.0/24, 1.1.2.0/24, and 1.1.3.0/24. We want to
summarize these networks into a single route that we can advertise across the
WAN, which reduces the number of routes in the remote routers.

We could summarize these routes with this supernet IP
address: 1.1.0.0/22. This single IP address references all four of the IP
subnets. Here’s a look at it in binary form:

```IP address: 00000001 00000001 00000000 0000000
Supernet subnet mask: 11111111 11111111 11111100 0000000```

Notice the third octet of the supernet subnet mask: 11111100.
This allows the last two bits of the third octet to be any combination of 00,
01, 10, or 11. So when advertised, this supernet mask would show that any of
the four subnets are available from the router.

Keep in mind that when subnetting or supernetting from the
classful boundaries, you must use a routing protocol that supports variable
Protocol version 2 (RIPv2), Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP),
the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) protocol, and Border Gateway Protocol (BGP).

Of these protocols, EIGRP is the only one that summarizes at
classful network boundaries by default—a capability that you can turn on or off.
On the other hand, OSPF requires manually entering a summary route with the summary-address command. BGP disables
autosummary by default, but you can turn it on, or you can use the aggregate-address command to create your
own summary route.

Whether you call it route summarization, route aggregation,
or supernetting, this practice is essential on the Internet. If every carrier
advertised every specific route it has, it would overwhelm the memory of the
Internet BGP routers. For example, my company’s BGP Internet router
has 125,000 routes to Internet networks, and most of these routes are
supernets. However, because the advertising routers summarize their routes, the
router is able to receive all Internet routes using only 125,000 entries.

Miss a column?

Check out the Cisco Routers and Switches
Archive
, and catch up on David Davis’ most recent columns.