At the risk of revealing my age again, I missed the radio controlled toy craze. My toys relied on gravity and kinetics for their movement. I would love to have my SSP Laker Special again — now that is a cool Geek Gift. But I must admit, radio controlled vehicles are pretty darn cool too.

And so, I was filled with great anticipation when I was given the assignment to test and review the RC Battle Tank Type 90. An appreciative shout-out goes to Think Geek for sending us one of these for the review. Alas, though, after mere minutes of opening the box I was gravely disappointed.


You can get a good look at the RC Battle Tank Type 90 in a TechRepublic Photo Gallery. A PDF version of this Geek Gift Guide is also available in a TechRepublic Download.



I guess we should have known what we were in for since there is no company name to be found anywhere on the box or in the documentation.

After removing the Battle Tank from the box one of the first things you notice is that our tank is really a 1/24 size sort of replica of a U.S. M1 Abrams tank. The strange thing is that no where on the box or in the sparse documentation does it say that — makes me think that the U.S. military declined to grant the manufacturer, whomever that may be, a license to use any official language in their descriptions.

The second thing you notice is that the Battle Tank is cheap, cheap, cheap. The materials are cheap, the construction is cheap, and the electronics are cheap. Even the batteries are some cheap off-brand. For something with a strong name like “Battle Tank,” it sure is one flimsy toy. For example as I was putting in the battery pack in the bottom of the tank, the hatch door on top of the tank broke off. And I don’t mean it got knocked off — it literally broke at the hinges. Cheap!

The motors inside the tanks seemed to be quite powerful, (we’ll find out when we crack it open) but I think they are too powerful for the way the tank was constructed. I took our tank outside for a spin and the gearing on the drive shaft for one of the treads broke. The entire gear was stripped of its spines — all I did was drive it about 10 feet.

The radio control unit is shaped like a handle and is easy to use, but it too is made very cheaply. The buttons feel fragile and I am sure they will eventually break from just normal use. And heaven-forbid you should drop it — I doubt it would survive the fall intact.

The air-cannon shoots plastic BBs with a range of around 20-feet. That definitely puts the cannon in the “not for little kids” category. The projectiles leave the tank with enough velocity to do damage to soft tissue like an eye. The BBs are also small, which means that they are difficult to find once they are fired from the tank, which also makes them prime size for little children to swallow.

The whole experience with this Battle Tank was plain disappointing.

What I like

  • Radio controlled tank
  • Powerful motors
  • Air cannon is powerful

What I don’t like

  • Cheaply constructed
  • Not a very good replica of an M1 Abrams
  • Poor tread drive design that guarantees quick failure
  • Lack of fine controls — every movement is full out — no subtlety
  • Disappointment the cheapness creates when the tank breaks mere minutes after the package is opened

Bottom line

I can think of no better way to sum up my review of the RC Battle Tank Type 90 than CHEAP! Everything about it is cheap with very little to redeem it. While the tank is obviously not designed for children and the rough play they would put it through, it is hardly suited for adult collectors or hobbyists since it has almost no value as a replica of the real thing. The whole thing has the aura of a quick way to bilk $40 out of an unsuspecting consumer.

Geek Gift Score

  • Fun factor: *
  • Geek factor: **
  • Value: *
  • Overall: *