In my last
article, you learned about a whole lot of SCSI—torrid
history and all. As you know, like ATA, SCSI is a
parallel technology with multiple devices included on each data channel. Also
like ATA, SCSI has been overhauled with its own serial technology, aptly named
Serial Attached SCSI (SAS).

In short, SAS
is the next generation of SCSI and includes substantial improvements, including
higher transfers speeds, better scalability and improved reliability. Some call
SAS a melding of the best of SCSI and Serial ATA. In fact, SAS uses the same
connector type as SATA, which might make it a little more difficult to identify
a drive, but can help reduce costs for manufacturers. Further, it provides
administrators with a way to mix-and-match drive types for different
applications, as needed.

Why the
change from parallel to serial on something as robust as SCSI? Simply put,
older parallel storage technologies were beginning to face an end-of-the-road
scenario in performance improvements. As such, the significant transition from
parallel to serial solutions is taking place. SAS provides storage
administrators with a point-to-point serial, manageable storage solution.

SAS specs comparison

It’s hard to
talk about SAS without comparing it to the current SATA standards. The initial
SAS standard provides a transfer rate of 300MB/s or 3Gb/second, while the most
prominent SATA standard limits this transfer rate to 150MB/s. SATA-II (also,
SATA-IO), increases this transfer rate to 300MB/s, which brings it more in line
with the current SAS spec. However, the next SAS specification, for which
drives should start appearing next year, brings SAS up to 600MB/s, keeping it
ahead of its SATA cousin. SAS is eventually expected to reach a speed of
1,200MB/s. That’s fast!

Tips in your inbox

TechRepublic’s free Storage NetNote newsletter is designed to help you manage the critical data in your enterprise.

Automatically sign up today!

There are a
lot of questions regarding other differences between SATA and SAS. Simply put,
all of the things that make SCSI a better choice than ATA drives for the
enterprise make SAS drives a better choice than SATA for the enterprise. The
SCSI command set is extremely robust and has been in use for decades in
mission-critical applications. SCSI includes such features as command queuing,
which allows the controller to run commands in the most efficient order possible
for increased performance. In SCSI systems, the job of handling the flow of
data between the disk system and the computer is handled by a dedicated
controller. In most SATA systems, the CPU has to assume this responsibility,
meaning that processing cycles that could, for example, go to running a
database, need to be used to manage storage.

Like the
venerable SCSI technology and SATA, SAS also supports hot plugging of disks,
which is critical for maintaining a highly available environment. Further, SAS
is a full-duplex system, while SATA continues IDE’s tradition of half-duplex
communication. Thus, SAS systems can provide roughly twice the throughput of a
similarly specified SATA system. Further, while there are a very few SATA
drives that spin faster than 7,200 RPM, many vendors are providing or will
provide disks that run at 10,000 and 15,000 RPMs, also resulting in a faster
disk system.

There is
another key different between SATA and SAS: cost. Like ATA and SCSI, SATA and
SAS disks have very differences prices. SATA disks are inexpensive, while SAS
disks aren’t cheap. However, for bulletproof storage, and additional storage
features, many enterprises will continue to use SCSI’s successor in the data
center, and, from the points above, rightfully so.

Since SATA
and SAS drive connectors are pin-compatible, it stands to reason that their
cables would be similar. However, SAS cables can be up to 6 meters in length,
six times longer than SATA’s limit of 1 meter. As stated, however, the ends are
the same.

When it comes
to comparing SCSI and SAS side-by-side, besides speed, SAS has one significant
advantage over SCSI. With SCSI, when different types of drives were connected
to the chain, all of the drives ran at the speed of the slowest disk. With SAS,
this is no longer the case. Even with drives of different types, each drive can
run at its native speed. Speaking of multiple drives, SAS allows up to 128
drives to be attached simultaneously. Through the use of expanders, this number
jumps to 16,000, making SAS uniquely qualified to handle even the largest data
center’s needs. Further, SAS disks can handle requests from multiple SAS
controllers, further enhancing its expansion capabilities.

While there
are similarities between SATA and SAS, when it comes to raw performance in the
data center, SAS is the clear winner. However, SATA and SAS are very much
complementary technologies. SATA is extremely well-suited to the desktop and to
near-line storage requirements, and even enterprise storage requirements for
smaller organizations. SAS, on the other hand, is more than capable of picking
up where SCSI left off in the enterprise.