Welcome to Point and Counterpoint

Point and Counterpoint’s purpose is to present a balanced discussion among our members regarding hardware, software, and any other topic that our members wish to debate. If you have a suggestion for Point and Counterpoint, feel free to send us a note.

I had an interesting argument the other day
It’s no secret around TechRepublic that I am fast becoming a huge supporter of the Linux operating system. I have written many articles lately in the Support Republic regarding the OS, to what I believe is the delight of the Linux community within TechRepublic.

Sponsored by RLX Technologies

Cut energy costs 5x. Slash operating costs 6x. Use 8x less space. Be the first of your power grid to profit. RLX, Redefining Server Economics.

For more information, check out TechRepublic’s Linux Servers Center or visit RLX Technologies.

However, not everyone around the office shares my opinion of Linux. As a matter of fact, a Windows 2000 supporter has challenged me to a test of the operating systems. He wants to know if I could set up a Linux server, including network support and Internet connectivity, in the same time that he could set up a Windows 2000 server with the same basic options.

I had to laugh at his request, as I have set up Windows 2000 Server and have seen exactly how long it takes to set up Microsoft’s new flagship OS. I told him I would accept the challenge if we could find two machines with equal components to do the installations on. After all, I wouldn’t want him to accuse me of cheating now, would I?

Point: So can a Linux server be set up faster?
Well, you know my opinion on this topic, and now I want to know yours. Do you believe that it is possible to install and set up a Linux server, with network access and Internet connectivity, faster than installing and setting up a Windows 2000 Server? Let your voice be heard! Send me e-mail, or leave a post below, explaining the reasons why you believe that a Linux server can be set up faster!

Counterpoint: Linux will choke on Win2K’s smoke!
Okay, do you believe that I’m a total moron? I’m sure you do, regardless, but do you believe that a Windows 2000 Server can be installed and set up faster, with network access and Internet connectivity, than a Linux server? I want to know your thoughts! Send me e-mail, or leave a post below, explaining your reasons for thinking that Windows 2000 can be installed faster than Linux.

A lawyer snuck this one in…

By submitting your answer, you agree to let TechRepublic publish your thoughts and/or suggestions on its Web site. You also agree that TechRepublic may adapt and edit and authorize the adaptation and editing of each submission, as it deems necessary. TechRepublic may or may not publish a submission at its sole discretion.