Whitehall is behind the times, leaving smug 'I told you so's' from industry
Written in my Weymouth hotel and dispatched to silicon.com the next day using a commercial wi-fi service available from my seat on a ferry just about to set sail for the continent. This is unusual - even for me - but courtesy of a certain volcano in Iceland there are no flights available throughout Europe!
I just love the response time of the internet with new and innovative solutions that quickly sideline things that are ill-conceived and/or make no sense.
Over the past few months the UK government has been formulating a new law that seeks - among other things - to curtail peer-to-peer (P2P) activities. Are they behind the times or what?
Needless to say individuals, groups and much of the industry have been lobbying hard to dissuade them.
The overhead of implementation, and limited impact on a world that understands the power of P2P - and that DRM is as good as dead - means this legislation is out of kilter with reality. One major company has already declared it will not reveal or share any form of customer data under any circumstances. Feelings have been running high and the protest has been vigorous.
What makes this example really interesting is the rate and manner in which the will of the people and industry was finally subverted for some obscure political reason. This story from The Guardian puts it all in perspective.
In the dying moments of a parliament this act was pushed through within two hours. For the life of me I cannot see why the rush, or what the big deal was! Just focusing on one hot issue for a moment: 'A legal framework for tackling copyright infringement via education and technical measures'.
Does this really mean all net activity will have to be monitored, recorded, analysed, people identified and punishment administered? Apparently so! The threat is that ISPs will be mandated to terminate the service of anyone engaged in file swapping. Can you imagine? Here is an extract:
- Copyright holders to report infringements to ISPs who must provide evidence and information about the legal situation
- ISPs to provide copyright holders with infringement lists per user
- Ofcom to report four times per year on copyright infringement activities
- Government to sanction speed and site blocks, bandwidth shaping and account suspension
- ISPs failing to apply tech measures can be fined up to £250,000
- Copyright owners to pay Ofcom's costs
- ISPs must pay their own costs of implementing technical measures
- Government to install managers at failing domain name registries
At this point there is a lot I could write but I won't! Here is the fun bit...