This week's quibble comes from the June 3, 2008 edition of Geek Trivia, "Fuel for disaster."
If you uncover a questionable fact or debatable aspect of this week's Geek Trivia, just post it in the discussion area of the article. Every week, yours truly will choose the best quibble from our assembled masses and discuss it in a future edition of Geek Trivia.
This week's quibble comes from the June 3, 2008 edition of Geek Trivia, "Fuel for disaster." TechRepublic member jlafitte nailed me for some imprecise description of Titan missile rocket fuel:
"The Titan and Titan II series missiles were LIQUID fuel-propelled, NOT solid-fuel. The article writer may be thinking of the Minuteman series of ICBMs, which ARE solid-fuel propelled."
No, I really was talking about the Titan, but I should have been more specific, as I was referring to the then-contemporary (1988) version of the Titan, the Titan IV, which had solid rocket booster components You're right that the Titans I and II had no SRBs, and the Titan III had optional SRBs. The main engine was liquid-fueled for every Titan, but the heavy lift later models depended heavily on SRBs. Sorry for the imprecision, but thanks for the quibble and keep them coming!
Falling behind on your weekly Geek fix?
Check out the Geek Trivia Archive, and catch up on the most recent editions of Geek Trivia.
Test your command of useless knowledge by subscribing to TechRepublic's Geek Trivia newsletter. Automatically sign up today!