In the most recent battle between open-source and proprietary software, Microsoft goes for the jugular by claiming that free and open-source software violates 235 of its patents. See the article from CNET Networks' News.com: "Report: Microsoft says open source violates 235 patents."
Here's an excerpt from the article:
"In an interview with Fortune, Microsoft top lawyer Brad Smith alleges that the Linux kernel violates 42 Microsoft patents, while its user interface and other design elements infringe on a further 65. OpenOffice.org is accused of infringing 45, along with 83 more in other free and open-source programs, according to Fortune. It is not entirely clear how Microsoft might proceed in enforcing these patents..."
For more information about Microsoft patent violations by open-source software, check out these other news takes:
- Microsoft demands royalties for open-source software (InfoWorld | IDG News Service)
- Put up or shut up, Microsoft (InfoWorld)
- Meeting Microsoft's Patent Threat (Linux Journal)
- Microsoft wants the money (Macworld)
- What should Microsoft do about the 235 “free software” patent violations? (ZDNet)
- GPLv3 the impetus for Microsoft’s latest Linux attack campaign (ZDNet)
Microsoft, which is usually on the other end of patent disputes, certainly isn't making any friends in the open source community. Do you think Microsoft is just in its claims and should receive royalties, or will this stab at open source turn people off and become a virtual nail in Microsoft's coffin? Join the discussion.
Stay on top of the latest tech news
Get this news story and many more by subscribing to our free IT News Digest newsletter, delivered each weekday. Automatically sign up today!