Some hard-won, expensive, and time-consuming lessons learned... and the resulting rewards... from Seattle's Swedish Medical Center deployment of its Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) are described in a pair of February 4, 2008 articles in Network World.
Several years ago I visited a friend who was a patient at Swedish, and I was impressed with their use of wheeled "computer stands" for recording patient information. Instead of trying to juggle a laptop, or tablet, or handheld device, when it's time to record information like periodic vital signs, medical personnel simply wheel a small, compact cart into the patient room. There are multiple carts available in the hallway and each holds a laptop, high-capacity (external to the computer) battery, and some other peripheral devices . The laptop is securely attached to the cart so it's not easily detached / stolen. From talking to the nurse who came in to attend to my friend, the computers on the carts were fully connected to the Swedish network via Wireless LAN. (Apparently the Swedish WLAN project was still in development at the time I saw it being used.)
The main thrust of the former article is that Swedish has gone through several time-consuming and expensive shifts in technology over the years it has been using / deploying its WLAN. It's also considering doing it again to take full advantage of 802.11n, which would allow Swedish to consolidate its use of 5 GHz and 2.4 GHz, which are currently separate networks.
The latter article gives an excellent overview that the WLAN is an integral component of a systemwide initiative at Swedish to automate processes and eliminate paper-based workflow. The WLAN is integral because it efficiently eliminates paperwork at the "source" and the "destination" of much of the information generated, and used, within Swedish - the (in)patient's bedside.
One of the most intriguing items from the latter article is that apparently Swedish has just begun implementing a Vocera Communications System for voice communications via its WLAN. If you're not familiar with Vocera... but you've seen the chest-worn "Communication Badges" in the television series "Star Trek, The Next Generation", then you know approximately how a Vocera Communications Badge works. That is - reach up to your chest, tap it, speak into it, the Vocera software / server figures out how route your request appropriately. Vocera explains it thus: The Vocera Communications Badge - B2000 is a wearable device that weighs less than two ounces and can easily be clipped to a shirt pocket or worn on a lanyard. It enables instant two-way voice conversation without the need to remember a phone number or manipulate a handset. The Vocera Communications Badge is controlled using natural spoken commands. To initiate a conversation with Jim and Mary, for example, the user would simply say, "Conference Jim Anderson and Mary Garman."
(An article in Forbes states that the Vocera Communications Badge was actually inspired by the intuitive communications devices used on the Star Trek television shows.)
Another interesting application that Swedish will attempt to implement using its WLAN is to track high value devices that are moved around within its buildings... possibly easily implemented by attaching "mute" versions of the Vocera Communications Badge to the high-value devices.
I'm very impressed with how Swedish uses its WLAN not as a mere "convenience" (such as using WLAN instead of wired network connections), but that the WLAN has become not only integral to improving existing processes at Swedish, but that the WLAN enables entirely new types of productivity and efficiencies.
Not stated... but quite possible... is that if Swedish does implement, as seems likely, a new WLAN based on 802.11n, perhaps inpatients will be able to use their laptops to have something to do besides watch television or read while they are recuperating. Enterprise-grade WLAN systems are easily able to "sort out" competing / mixed security WLAN (and, of course LAN) usage through the use of Virtual Local Area Network (VLAN) and other technologies such as multiple Service Set Identifiers (SSIDs). There wouldn't seem to be an issue with a inpatient's laptop causing "interference"; with deployed an intensively-used a WLAN, Swedish would have discovered any "Radio Frequency issues" with medical equipment.
How about it readers - would you want the option to use your laptop if you have to spend time in a hospital? Or would you rather just "hit the button", zone out on your pain medication, and catch up on your sleep?