I just came across an article in BusinessWeek Online that
examines the potential backlash of blogging indiscretions. It cites various
cases where individuals found their reputations compromised by some salacious
personal tidbit that had made its way to the Web—often via their own brash
blog posts. The article, "You Are What You Post,"
also discusses the highly unsettling trend of employers vetting job candidates (or
investigating current employees) via Google, discovering all sorts ofinformation that they couldn't legally obtain otherwise:
"Googling people is becoming a way for bosses and
headhunters to do continuous and stealthy background checks on employees, no
disclosure required. Google is an end run around discrimination laws, inasmuch
as employers can find out all manner of information — some of it for a nominal
fee — that is legally off limits in interviews: your age, your martial status,
the value of your house (along with an aerial photograph of it), the average
net worth of your neighbors, fraternity pranks, stuff you wrote in college,
liens, bankruptcies, political affiliations, and the names and ages of yourchildren."
So here's my question (or questions, rather) to the managers
out there: Have you ever used Google to get an in-depth picture of someone you
were thinking about hiring? And if so, did you come across information that made
a difference in your view of the candidate, either pro or con? Do you have any
qualms about digging into someone's personal or financial background by using
Google to slip under the radar of our privacy protections or do the ends
justify the means? And finally, have you ever Googled your way into a discoverythat made you think, "Whew — dodged a bullet on this guy!"?
Blog safely, y'all.