Security·4,733 discussions

SECURITY. TAKING CARE OURSELVES. WAITING IS OVER

Locked

NO MORE WAITING. TAKING CARE OF SECURITY OURSELVES.

Every year USA expend thousand of millions, even billions of dollars in security. Especially, in NT or XP environment. Problem is, that there is not a radical solution to Security, the spy ware and virus are there as well the breaks ins, so those who suffer in reality are the home users, and our children are exposed to pornography and many honest networks lost money.
Security administrators, as well many IT technicians know that security has two main folded problems.
1. Spywares and viruses.
2. The hackers attacks

The main radical solutions cover these two aspects, the malwares and the break in. A good security system must involved the end of spywares and virus as well the invisibility of all our ports, telnet, ping, tcp and udp incoming and outgoing etc. So, if a hacker wants to break in, will not know were to start. Don?t need to buy routers. I?ve been enjoying this freedom for almost two years. I won?t deny that I have tried two sell this information, using various means but I do lack in connection, so tonight Friday the 6, 2006 I have take the decision of sharing it, with you for free. I do not belong to the Open Source community, so do not mistaking me. So without more talk let?s walk the end of malwares, and enjoy the knowledge of having a secure system.

FIRSTH SOLUTION. The NT System windows 2000 or xp and the coming vista as a base, and the NT system and NT have as base the Unix System, with the difference that the code is not open for modification. The Unix System or GNU+Linux, do not have the problems of spywares and virus. Is possible to have a windows system without or almost nothing of malwares, is very simple even my 13 years old boy can do it. Although is easy the information itself is high in relevance even some Computer Scientist do not know about it, and those who know it wont tell you the full implication.
The information and steps of doing have my private rights, no the tools, I give the information for free to you but in any way this information could be used to make a software that contains this information, this information is done out the book therefore I own it, and will summarize the tree steps in bold letters:
1. THE END OF MALWARES
2. SECURITY. FREE AT LAST
3. PASSWORDS (this is of much importance, It wrap it up every thing, at the beginning do your passwords as you want. At the end if you decided to follow my information regarding password, you follow it, the decision is complete yours. The first and second step will work regardless you follow the third step or not.
This is a hands on practice, it been tested for almost 2 years is not longer in beta.
So let?s begin the hand on experience.
If you have the option of doing a whole Recovery System do it, (put your back up files in a cd) if not I will tell you when to begin. DISCONNECT OF THE INTERNET ONLY SHOULD BE CONNECT THE KEYBOARD, THE MOUSE , THE MONITOR AND THE SPEAKERS.
If you have the Icon of Recovery System click on it. If a window comes out telling you ? you partition disk is gone? do not worried, simply right click the icon, and click properties, a box will show and where it says open target, left click on it (when I do not say right click, all is left click) four icons will appear, the icon that says write a cd , click on it, the icon now will appear in the bottom left side of your screen saying that you need to place a CD-W and write , once is finish writing it , the cd-w will be push out itself , take the CDW out, and a small box will tell you restart, click OK, if not small box shows up restart anyway, once in your desktop right click the Recovery System icon, click the open option, and the big box of Recovery System will show up, it will ask if you want to start the process click ok, it will ask if you have created a cdw check mark yes, continue it, you will be ask if you want to do a full System Recovery or a Custom for advance users check mark the advance users and continue, you will see a box within a small box that said the number of your default space , in my case is 15 gb. Now is the time of increasing your space , not hardware is needed, those who tell you that in order to increase your gb , there is the need of buying hardware, are only after your money and it can cost you 300 hundred dollars, so my computer is 2003 and have 15 gb as default I put 90 the next one will be? all ? , you don?t want to put all , you may have the option of putting 120 before ?all? then do it, How much you put is entirely up to you, but according to my experience put the number before all is ok in my system. IF you want increase your space is up to you, no matter what, one day a box will show up saying that you are running out of space then buy a new computer or pay 300 dollars to your favorite tech store, some will say the increase is only virtual is not physical, again that is just talk , I have tested and work not hardware is needed, if you decided to increase your space, once, you do it click continue and the recovery system will start, those whose Icon of RS is ok, click you have created already a CDW, and follow the same steps when the whole system recovery is completed you will be ask to write a SR cdw, anyway, then the whole system will restart and the whole recovery of C+D drives will start, those who?s computers do not have the ICON SR do not worry we haven start yet the termination of malwares .
TERMINATION OF SPYWARES AND IMMUNIZATION TO VIRUS. Once you finish the whole RS or if you haven?t done the RS, restart your computer, while is restarting press the F8 key then a black page appears, giving you several option, using the arrows keys you go to SAFE MODE press enter and you will see the partition files, then the ADMINISTRATOR OPTION will appear you must enter as ADMINISTRATOR click and once you enter click ok and a black desktop screen without internet connection will appear go to run and type MSCONFIG click ok a box will show up , go to the start items option once there click DISABLE all the items must be disable , press apply and ok and exit without restart, is in this moment that you do the end of malwares(virus, spywares etc) once you have done it, Keep in mind that you are not removing you are just disabling. The sweet side of this program is that you are disabling the strongest spywares click apply and ok, exit without restart, then click on explorer icon, go to tools click internet options, in general you type the name of the page to do search, delete all cookies, delete all files off line files as well , put your history in 0 value and click and ok erase history. Go to the next tab there you increase the default of the internet icon as well Ethernet, apply, go to privacy and increase the default , go to connection and check automatic detection, then apply , go to the last tab and uncheck third parties connections, DO NOT restart, go to control panels right click , and click open, go to ad and remove, if quicken for taxes is off date you must remove it, we want to get rid of , the ports the hackers must be using, after go again to the start and right click on my computer click on properties and uncheck remote help, closed, and those who have done your whole RS is a good time to set your administrator password go to control panel , click users, click administrator and set the password, I found out that in a house is better to have only one user, nobody has the right to profile each member of the family, the same could be applied to networks, close DO NOT restart , go to run MSCONFIG must be there click ok on the MSCONFIG BOX and exit restarting, you will end at your desktop and the box of msconfig must be there check that nothing is there even if little messenger is check disable and EXIT WHITHOUT RESTART.
All seems to be normal; wrong although all is colorful, you are in a mode the safeties? mode in windows, just one click should be enough to open the programs, get rid of the costume of keep clicking the screen is an unsafe practice.
After, the speed will increase, you can listen to all kinds of music your kids can play in messenger and your computer never slow down the end of malwares have begun, who did it you did it , go to the explorer and repeat the same steps only that in connection you don?t do nothing, repeat all you have done in safe mode, and this is over. To those who done the whole RS update till you get SPACK 2.
ADMMINISTRATOR . Root word in Greek OIKONOMY, oiko= household, nomy= law or arrangement. The arrangement of the house , as a Administrator you have the right of disabling the start items, which are part of the EULA agreement, only as Administrator you have the right not of removing but disable the start items, as Administrator you can do it, and not law, can take away from you, what you think is better for your household.
Waiting for your speedy feed back
RUBEN

Topic

Wow Lengthy Post – unfortunately no secret or new info

In reply to SECURITY. TAKING CARE OURSELVES. WAITING IS OVER

Wow Ruben quite a lengthy post, however; it was quite difficult to follow due to the grammatical & English errors. In reading through the post you make some good points on essentially doing due diligence of a good administrator on windows based systems. This type of information has been readily available for all versions of windows and has changed with the windows versions. So I agree that everyone should take time and practice good administrator due diligence on their systems as well, however; unfortunately you do not own any real intellectual property rights on this info as it has been published in various books by Microsoft as well as other industry vendors such as Queue, Sybex etc.. What you have done here is recapped a lot of good info – although difficult to understand and read through, good none the less.

Now on to the crux of the matter with the info you present. While this will help in preventing malware & spyware etc it will also hamper/reduce functionality of the operating system overall. If the end user is willing to accept reduction in features functions, for a slight performance improvement and increasing the level of difficulty for malware & spyware to be introduced then by all means they could take these actions.

Even if one takes these actions however; the need for firewalls, antivirus and other protective measures is not eradicated. Even with your recommended actions there is still risk and exposure of the operating system and applications to malware, spyware and viruses your approach merely adds a bit more difficulty in having them get onto your system but it is not impenetrable.

Also in your post you state how simple it is and that supposedly those ?computer scientists? who do know this won?t tell you the full implications, but yet you do not fully disclose to the readers what the implications of your recommendations are on system features and functions and this risks involved with them as well. To be fair in your recommendations you need to provide full disclosure on this as well, or you are in essence just like the computer scientists you refer to who fail to disclose their knowledge of the implications.

It is generally agreed and accepted by most in the IT security field and in the IT industry in general that Security is everyone?s business and we should all strive to take care of security ourselves, and I support this as well. If the solution you provided was truly as powerful as you imply and really is the utopia of security solutions you would not have a hard time trying to sell it. Even if it were developed into a formal solution there would still be plenty of work for those in the IT security & IT fields in general. So there is really no incentive for anyone not to publish it, market it or sell it other than most of it has already been published and is available for those who wish to take advantage of it.

If you truly are sitting on a gold mine solution as you imply it is not evident from the recommendations and solution you present in the post. If there is more to this and you are looking to develop a possible solution there are any number of security solution providers who would gladly help you with this. The financial aspects of such a partnership would need to be worked out but the first security solution vendor to be able to boast they have the ?final? security solution for windows would gladly look to take this market share. So as you can see your claims about the soundness and viability of your recommendations appear not to add up to be as valuable as implied in this post.

WOW and

In reply to Wow Lengthy Post – unfortunately no secret or new info

here’s me thinking is was a ‘Lose weight while you sleep’ offering, or that well known scandinavian diet bread.

Lose weight while you sleep

In reply to WOW and

Tony how did you know that I’m overweight? While you sleep? Inpresive. Not at all.
I have receive several feed backs:

-It has been a long time since I read such a disjointed and bizarre posting.
– He is from Canada.
– Hum….
And one good one from Matthew.
I did not know that this tech site were so open to the open Source philophy + the fact that the majority were GNU+Linux users.
This welcome to my post + the braging of severals profiles was enough for me to figure it out, how my life will be here regarding interchange of knowlege.
I use Linux as well, the boot disk MOVE from O’really, and plan to buy a box to install the full fedora version, only for study porpouse.
I don’t like GNU+Linux user interface, something not to be overlooked, a home user will be lost using GNU+LINUX system so it just not click on the interface, the majority of vendors do not want to do nothing with Gnu+Linux system, Best buy, Droug Mark, Future Shop, Radio Shack now know as the source, to mention few, have a “We hate that system” actitude.
I wonder why? Wondering is something that stops once you gather the principles, the history, and todays impact.
Regarding the Open Source Community, a person just need to download Mozilla to know their intrinsic philosophy ” If you don’t want to share, you will share anyway” So they do in the background. I guess I understand more Mr. Allmard introduction “Free software does not mean that is free” You can see his speech in google video I can give you my web site it has google video on it as well several TV STATIONS. So when you feel musical just go to:
http://radiotvsignal.blogspot.com/
I guess this will be my last post, and I’m out of here.
The post that I made was not bizarre, neither was the lack of knowledge, Yes it has grammar errors, but maybe it was good to be just like that.
Not waiting for a replay
Ruben

Hmm major disrespect

In reply to Lose weight while you sleep

“Not waiting for a reply”. In others words what this particular peer believes of you, you do not care. Anything I might believe or say is immaterial, so my only question is
why did you bother to say it in the first place ?

Come on don’t be a prick, I read your missive and to me it looked like you were trying to sell something dodgy. Whether you were or you weren’t is immaterial either your impression failed or your impression failed. Hardly my fault is it ?
I really can’t figure out what you are trying to say
so I’m left with four possibilities
I’m too stupid to understand
You are saying something stupid
Your presentation confused me
My perception of your presentation confused me

Take your pick !

Response expected and gratefully as well, if I think you are right I’ll say so and if I think you are wrong I’ll try to persuade you so, but I won’t insult you by saying your opinion is worthless !

Reply To: SECURITY. TAKING CARE OURSELVES. WAITING IS OVER

In reply to Hmm major disrespect

Hear, Hear

Boy, those monkeys just keep getting closer

In reply to Hmm major disrespect

Soon they’ll have MacBeth finished and move on to Hamlet.

Dude

In reply to Lose weight while you sleep

He never said you were overweight. He was comparing your idea to the concept of wrapping some material around your middle and sleeping with it on, on the belief that it will cause you to loose weight with the minimum of work. No diets, no excersize.

No results either.

PUSHING THE ENVELOP

In reply to WOW and

PUSHING THE ENVELOP.

All that I said was that I have a windows XP that is secure, fast, and very reliable. The gathering of information, research, testing, is my own property.
Because Got tired to try to sell the information and I couldn?t doe to my lack of connection I tried to give it for free trough the TECH MAGAZINE.
I have received feedbacks like:
. I haven?t read something that bizarre.
. Say?what
. You are sitting in a gold mine etc (Matthew Forgive for telling you do not replay).
So I will give you my address 66.222.170.196
I?m giving you, more specific information. I?m using an apple or Linux wall paper.
At your end all you have to do is:
1. Described and tell me the wall paper.
2. What I have in my Favorites in Internet explorer.

Any damage to my system doe to my handling to you my domicile is entirely my responsibility and I assumed all losses. I swear before the Canadian flag and the bible that there is not trickery on my end but what I believed to be the most secure system in the world.
And as well swear before the Canadian flag and the bible that not one person will be accused of breaking on my system.
Every person has only one shot and receives help only of one outsider.
Waiting for your speedy replay
Ruben.

Sorry, no.

In reply to PUSHING THE ENVELOP

I have very little idea what you’re saying in most of your posts — they’re absurdly difficult to understand. One thing that seems clear, though, is that you’re challenging people to crack security on your Windows XP desktop system.

1. That would be hugely stupid. Security crackers are a lower form of life than (most of) the rest of us, particularly actual hackers (in the classic sense of the term). One piece of evidence of that is that only an idiotic security cracker would be so imbecilic as to take you up on that.

2. Even a security cracker, if he has any brains at all, would be smart enough to confirm your identity and IP address before just taking your word for it, and I’m pretty sure none of us are interested in cracking the TR servers to confirm any such thing.

3. I have no interest in trying to disprove anything you say, or otherwise prove anything, by cracking your system’s security — in fact, I can’t even understand enough of what you’re saying to be sure of what I’m supposed to be disproving.

4. Say what?

rotflmao

In reply to Sorry, no.

I think he wants us to set our wallpaper to an apple and look at a firewall while dancing around in a tutu…

I don’t trust the poster, nor do I understand what he is saying…

Understanding the Missives

In reply to rotflmao

I think if we put on Iron Butterfly’s Inagodavida and puff on the hookah, we will reach a state of being where our minds will find equalibrium with the quantum forces of the universe and understand his writings….

hell yes

In reply to Understanding the Missives

The reference to the muchly-mangled “in the garden of eden” was perfect. You made my day.

FILM FAN

In reply to Understanding the Missives

I will like to thank to all who gave me a feed back on my posts. I?m not a troller as someone pointed out. I did try to talk to you on how secure the NT system that I?m working on is.
Though I thank you I won?t deny that the majority of them were full of arrogance and insults which have been the trade mark of GNU+Linux users Anthropology.
I did not found a trace of skepticism on the feed backs, to the Greeks skepticism meant inquire: ?I personally don?t know at the moment, but I?m trying to find out the truth?.
Your comments were full of unbelief, those who say to everybody, about anything ?no? ?I doubt it? ?How do you know??
The love for the truth was and is of great importance. Or should we be content with ignorance? This question has been taken seriously by Socrates, Erasmus, Montaigne and Cabell.
We need the truth because without it, we cannot distinguish cleverly arguably truth from clever falsehoods.
To have true knowledge is important to override falsehood or ignorance.
I was grammatically incorrect but that does not give the ground to any computer student to call me imbecile or mock by posting ?say what?
I did the claim of having a most secure system, because I have the knowledge of the machine I?m working on, and a small mistake can destroy what I firmly believe.
Your comments contain such arrogance, that I forget that I?m dealing with GNU+Linux users, who are grammatically correct, and maybe Usenet users, who set the standards when on the edge connected the small program UUCP using the Unix system to the telephone lines giving birth to the internet.
I?m not making the claim of having a perfect system but one that I see has improve getting better and better, to have a windows machine like this is unheard off.
I gave you my address not to lower you but to test my machine, as some one call me I?m an imbecile, I know a person only needs the email to do it.
For give my address to such large crowd of computers students I do apologized.

Ruben

vidalr, it’s not just the GNU / Linux crowd

In reply to Understanding the Missives

I’m strictly a Windows user (at this point), but I also found your first posting to be nearly incomprehensible. I’m not ready to debate the pros and cons of your posting because I can’t figure out what you are trying to say. I’ll admit that the second one is much clearer; so much clearer that I had to check to see if it was posted by a different person.

While most of us here can overlook bad grammar, spelling, punctuations, etc., some of your sentences are so poorly constructed as to be unreadable. Although your profile says you’re in Alberta, your postings read like English isn’t yourr first language. You may want to have someone else proofread your posts for clarity before you submit them.

Hope you don’t mind

In reply to Understanding the Missives

if I listen to the slayer remake? My turntable doesn’t work, so I can’t put on the old vinyl (28 minutes?) ENTIRE side. It is also the single thickest album that I have ever seen in my entire life!

in the garden of eden baby!

ROTFLMAO

In reply to rotflmao

I will like to thank to all who gave me a feed back on my posts. I?m not a troller as someone pointed out. I did try to talk to you on how secure the NT system that I?m working on is.
Though I thank you I won?t deny that the majority of them were full of arrogance and insults which have been the trade mark of GNU+Linux users Anthropology.
I did not found a trace of skepticism on the feed backs, to the Greeks skepticism meant inquire: ?I personally don?t know at the moment, but I?m trying to find out the truth?.
Your comments were full of unbelief, those who say to everybody, about anything ?no? ?I doubt it? ?How do you know??
The love for the truth was and is of great importance. Or should we be content with ignorance? This question has been taken seriously by Socrates, Erasmus, Montaigne and Cabell.
We need the truth because without it, we cannot distinguish cleverly arguably truth from clever falsehoods.
To have true knowledge is important to override falsehood or ignorance.
I was grammatically incorrect but that does not give the ground to any computer student to call me imbecile or mock by posting ?say what?
I did the claim of having a most secure system, because I have the knowledge of the machine I?m working on, and a small mistake can destroy what I firmly believe.
Your comments contain such arrogance, that I forget that I?m dealing with GNU+Linux users, who are grammatically correct, and maybe Usenet users, who set the standards when on the edge connected the small program UUCP using the Unix system to the telephone lines giving birth to the internet.
I?m not making the claim of having a perfect system but one that I see has improve getting better and better, to have a windows machine like this is unheard off.
I gave you my address not to lower you but to test my machine, as some one call me I?m an imbecile, I know a person only needs the email to do it.
For give my address to such large crowd of computers students I do apologized.

Ruben

Well, if nothing else

In reply to ROTFLMAO

you have shown us that you know how to copy and paste. Attaboy!

Pantheon

In reply to Sorry, no.

I will like to thank to all who gave me a feed back on my posts. I?m not a troller as someone pointed out. I did try to talk to you on how secure the NT system that I?m working on is.
Though I thank you I won?t deny that the majority of them were full of arrogance and insults which have been the trade mark of GNU+Linux users Anthropology.
I did not found a trace of skepticism on the feed backs, to the Greeks skepticism meant inquire: ?I personally don?t know at the moment, but I?m trying to find out the truth?.
Your comments were full of unbelief, those who say to everybody, about anything ?no? ?I doubt it? ?How do you know??
The love for the truth was and is of great importance. Or should we be content with ignorance? This question has been taken seriously by Socrates, Erasmus, Montaigne and Cabell.
We need the truth because without it, we cannot distinguish cleverly arguably truth from clever falsehoods.
To have true knowledge is important to override falsehood or ignorance.
I was grammatically incorrect but that does not give the ground to any computer student to call me imbecile or mock by posting ?say what?
I did the claim of having a most secure system, because I have the knowledge of the machine I?m working on, and a small mistake can destroy what I firmly believe.
Your comments contain such arrogance, that I forget that I?m dealing with GNU+Linux users, who are grammatically correct, and maybe Usenet users, who set the standards when on the edge connected the small program UUCP using the Unix system to the telephone lines giving birth to the internet.
I?m not making the claim of having a perfect system but one that I see has improve getting better and better, to have a windows machine like this is unheard off.
I gave you my address not to lower you but to test my machine, as some one call me I?m an imbecile, I know a person only needs the email to do it.
For give my address to such large crowd of computers students I do apologized.

Ruben

Pantheon??

In reply to Pantheon

priceless…

I’ve been promoted!

In reply to Pantheon

I’ve gone from being a mere apotheon to an entire pantheon of divinities! O joy! O happy day!

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

In reply to I’ve been promoted!

feeling a bit.. fragmented in your personalities today?

suffering heavily from your multiple personality disorder today I see.

nah

In reply to I’ve been promoted!

It’s just the sleep deprivation talking.

How are things on Mount Olympus?

In reply to I’ve been promoted!

It must be tough having to move again so soon.

He Who Kills

In reply to I’ve been promoted!

Better not take that lil chain off your belly then or else bad Dennis Hopper kinda things might happen….

Plus Karen Black ain’t so hot anymore.

both of ya

In reply to I’ve been promoted!

Palmetto: I’m not moving again. I like it here. I’m having Olympus brought to me. I’m a pantheon, after all — I can do that.

BFilm: I blame the sleep deprivation. I’m missing the references.

Film References

In reply to I’ve been promoted!

Trilogy of Terror where a lil Zuni fetish doll named “He Who Kills” has his lil chain about his waist removed by Karen Black. The evil lil doll then proceeds to chase her about the apartment with a huge butcher knife.

Today, it is viewed as some really bad special effects, but back in the 70’s when it first came out, it scared the utter living poop out of my kid brothers and sisters.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0073820/

Earlier reference on TR to He Who Kills:

http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-11183-0.html?forumID=9&threadID=184799&messageID=1898008

Not a troller…

In reply to Pantheon

Just a spammer. What gives? Three times posting the exact same thing with a different title. Trying to up your postcount or something? Lol.

Try typing in your native language and asking babelfish to translate it. It might prove a bit better. If no one can understand it now, what have you to loose?

There you go again

In reply to PUSHING THE ENVELOP

How many times are you going to spam this same message around TR? Continue to cut and paste the exact same message and you will only recieve ridicule for not only making post the average tech can’t understand, but for also being nothing more than just another common spammer.

When you grow up and buy yourself a clue, you will realize that your pasted comment does NOT fit in to most converstations and only makes you look even more foolish than you did before spamming it around.

Grammar and typos are easily forgiven. Being a crya$$ spammer is not.

Nice touch to keep telling people that you are done and then keep going anyways.

most secure, not impressed.

OPEN LETTER

In reply to Wow Lengthy Post – unfortunately no secret or new info

PUSHING THE ENVELOP.

All that I said was that I have a windows XP that is secure, fast, and very reliable. The gathering of information, research, testing, is my own property.
Because Got tired to try to sell the information and I couldn?t doe to my lack of connection I tried to give it for free trough the TECH MAGAZINE.
I have received feedbacks like:
. I haven?t read something that bizarre.
. Say?what
. You are sitting in a gold mine etc (Matthew Forgive for telling you do not replay).
So I will give you my address 66.222.170.196
I?m giving you, more specific information. I?m using an apple or Linux wall paper.
At your end all you have to do is:
1. Described and tell me the wall paper.
2. What I have in my Favorites in Internet explorer.

Any damage to my system doe to my handling to you my domicile is entirely my responsibility and I assumed all losses. I swear before the Canadian flag and the bible that there is not trickery on my end but what I believed to be the most secure system in the world.
And as well swear before the Canadian flag and the bible that not one person will be accused of breaking on my system.
Every person has only one shot and receives help only of one outsider.
Waiting for your speedy replay
Ruben.

I’m not a hollywood hacker

In reply to OPEN LETTER

even routine security would surpass my current knowledge level and without a lot of effort I’m not prepared to put in, I doubt I could put a dent in it.
Note most of the holes in any system are made by the owner out of sheer ignorance, not by that twit Neo

Uh ok

In reply to OPEN LETTER

A) I don’t trust that is your IP
B) Who cares? If I wanted a target that wouldn’t press charges, I’d go to hackthissite.org.
C) You will probably get tons of port scans and nothing more (if that is your real IP)…
D) How do you know each person has only one shot? If they know how to poke at security, I would hope they know how to spoof…

GARVIN

In reply to Uh ok

I will like to thank to all who gave me a feed back on my posts. I?m not a troller as someone pointed out. I did try to talk to you on how secure the NT system that I?m working on is.
Though I thank you I won?t deny that the majority of them were full of arrogance and insults which have been the trade mark of GNU+Linux users Anthropology.
I did not found a trace of skepticism on the feed backs, to the Greeks skepticism meant inquire: ?I personally don?t know at the moment, but I?m trying to find out the truth?.
Your comments were full of unbelief, those who say to everybody, about anything ?no? ?I doubt it? ?How do you know??
The love for the truth was and is of great importance. Or should we be content with ignorance? This question has been taken seriously by Socrates, Erasmus, Montaigne and Cabell.
We need the truth because without it, we cannot distinguish cleverly arguably truth from clever falsehoods.
To have true knowledge is important to override falsehood or ignorance.
I was grammatically incorrect but that does not give the ground to any computer student to call me imbecile or mock by posting ?say what?
I did the claim of having a most secure system, because I have the knowledge of the machine I?m working on, and a small mistake can destroy what I firmly believe.
Your comments contain such arrogance, that I forget that I?m dealing with GNU+Linux users, who are grammatically correct, and maybe Usenet users, who set the standards when on the edge connected the small program UUCP using the Unix system to the telephone lines giving birth to the internet.
I?m not making the claim of having a perfect system but one that I see has improve getting better and better, to have a windows machine like this is unheard off.
I gave you my address not to lower you but to test my machine, as some one call me I?m an imbecile, I know a person only needs the email to do it.
For give my address to such large crowd of computers students I do apologized.

Ruben

Response

In reply to OPEN LETTER

Juan R Posadas developed a better sales pitch. I would recommend that you take a few moments and study his career.

http://www.forteantimes.com/articles/176_trots.shtml

Posadas is a genius

In reply to Response

It’s like scientology, except better!

Better than Scientology

In reply to Posadas is a genius

South America has generated a number of really strange characters and he is among the most interesting.

Goal?

In reply to OPEN LETTER

Is it your goal to post the same exact posts in at least 1 thread at least 1x a day?

Huh?

In reply to SECURITY. TAKING CARE OURSELVES. WAITING IS OVER

Say what?

Yikes!

In reply to SECURITY. TAKING CARE OURSELVES. WAITING IS OVER

Yikes Rueben,

It appears that you are a bit fustrated about your post, the responses and the status of getting your proposed solution published.

My orginal post was merely to address the difficulty in understanding your post and your solution as posted due to the difficulty in reading the post. Also, part of that difficulty in reading it was understanding your position regarding your solution. The post came across as though you had a solution which was viable and unique and no one wanted it, and from the post there was nothing to indicate it was unique.

In regards to your email, I have not received an email from you yet with details but would be glad to respond when I do.

In regards to philosophy you kind of opened up the discussion on that by ending your post with the root of the word OIKONOMY.

In regards to an apparent bias you have against GNU/Unix audiences, my systems are primarily Windows though there are Unix and Macintosh in the mix as well.

Provided for reference are a couple of links on Windows security guidelines & configurations from NIAP & the NSA.
http://www.nsa.gov/snac/os/winxp/winxp.pdf

http://www.nsa.gov/snac/os/winnt/winnt_networks.pdf

http://www.nsa.gov/snac/os/win2k/w2k_winnt_9x_clients.pdf

This is the kind of detail that would help in regards to the viability of the solution you write about.

The problem with

In reply to Yikes!

all his posts is simple..long posts that are one huge block of text.

If he broke them into paragraphs rather than the one huge block then it would be far easier to read.
[ and we might not flay him for the posts ]

Consult with..

In reply to SECURITY. TAKING CARE OURSELVES. WAITING IS OVER

Maybe you should consult with entawanabi.

[Author]

Replies