After Hours

Do I dump the long, the tall, and the short of it on anyone in these threads. There occurs a holding back. I recommend the same to you in your presentations. It's what CBS "Interactive" amounts to.

When I said "So not getting it" I did not mean that you're dumb. I mean that you refuse to try to see how I could be having a point, demanding instead that I serve up to you, on a silver platter, a point that I cannot communicate to you without your active participation.
I get what you mean, but I have the training to say that you're overlooking something. If you choose to believe that you're all-seeing in this, then there's nothing I can do about it. That's what "so not getting it" is about.

Let us all see if the object of our attention has the administrative and depth of intellect to reflect, again, with paucity.

I do not believe I am all-seeing and have never represented myself as such.

I'm done participating in the circumstance of me being constantly and consistently ridiculed for the lack of my acceptance that everything is relative except what you deem otherwise.

I consider poking holes in peoples assumptions to be a perfectly valid response to a comment that, to me, indicates lack of thought, or assumptions I don't agree with.

What you just described is perfectly on-topic, meaningful, and helpful for reasonable discussion. Are you somehow claiming that lame distractions to avoid the fact you can't keep up with discussion is equivalent to questioning assumptions -- or what?

Preoccupied with nuts; or, something else, taken and routing for what you think to be truffles.

. . . preoccupied with your curmudgeonly reputation, <tt>santeewelding</tt>.

The easily distracted deserve our charity.