After Hours

General discussion


Un-Official poll: Is thread-jacking to be frowned upon?

By AnsuGisalas ·
Tags: Off Topic
Follow these guidelines:Peruse the three following zero-level parts of this thread; vote "+" on the one that applies.Try not to vote "-" , it will mess up the count

EDIT : Aaaand... it's (un)official, some people have been putting minuses elsewhere than the equalizer... naughty, naughty! It's not like I can't see who you are. Well, so I can't. But still, you know who you are, put yourselves in the corner and give yourselves a talking to .
I guess having each option be self-contained using both pluses and minuses will be the way to go.

This conversation is currently closed to new comments.

Thread display: Collapse - | Expand +

All Comments

Collapse -


by santeewelding In reply to And

Do I dump the long, the tall, and the short of it on anyone in these threads. There occurs a holding back. I recommend the same to you in your presentations. It's what CBS "Interactive" amounts to.

Collapse -

You know Chad...

by AnsuGisalas In reply to And

When I said "So not getting it" I did not mean that you're dumb. I mean that you refuse to try to see how I could be having a point, demanding instead that I serve up to you, on a silver platter, a point that I cannot communicate to you without your active participation.
I get what you mean, but I have the training to say that you're overlooking something. If you choose to believe that you're all-seeing in this, then there's nothing I can do about it. That's what "so not getting it" is about.

Collapse -

Pile on

by santeewelding In reply to And

Let us all see if the object of our attention has the administrative and depth of intellect to reflect, again, with paucity.

Collapse -

Don't bother.

by apotheon In reply to And

I do not believe I am all-seeing and have never represented myself as such.

I'm done participating in the circumstance of me being constantly and consistently ridiculed for the lack of my acceptance that everything is relative except what you deem otherwise.

Collapse -

Not Always

by dogknees In reply to What do you consider to b ...

I consider poking holes in peoples assumptions to be a perfectly valid response to a comment that, to me, indicates lack of thought, or assumptions I don't agree with.

Collapse -

What does that have to do with what I said?

by apotheon In reply to Not Always

What you just described is perfectly on-topic, meaningful, and helpful for reasonable discussion. Are you somehow claiming that lame distractions to avoid the fact you can't keep up with discussion is equivalent to questioning assumptions -- or what?

Collapse -

You are a squirrel, Chad

by santeewelding In reply to Not Always

Preoccupied with nuts; or, something else, taken and routing for what you think to be truffles.

Collapse -

You are a badger . . .

by apotheon In reply to Not Always

. . . preoccupied with your curmudgeonly reputation, <tt>santeewelding</tt>.

Collapse -


by Tigger_Two In reply to &quot;other&quot;

How about unintentional distraction?

Ohh!!! Kitty!

EVERYTHING is distraction to me. Just sayin...

Collapse -


by apotheon In reply to Hmmm...

The easily distracted deserve our charity.

Related Discussions

Related Forums