Discussion Locked

Do you trust SpySweeper, by webroot?

0 helpful
42 replies
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

I am not sure I trust this program.

I have the full package installed. Was at a security expo a few months ago, and they were handing out the full package free.

I have auto update turned off, yet it is still trying to contact home? Zone alarm said something and I said no. There wasn't anything I told it to go out for. X-(

When you select "shutdown" from the spysweeper menu, there are still a few processes running that I "do not have permission to stop".

When I load a program, I want to know what it is doing, and when it is doing it. I talked to the sales guy because I am testing this to see if I want to get it for work and he said he would have a tech call to answer my questions. Two weeks later, still no call.

Sorry, I just don't trust it. Do you?

42 replies

by stress junkie

As I see it there are two areas of trust. One is whether the product behaves as advertised. The other is whether the product is deliberately malicious. When it comes to whether products will behave as advertised I don't fully trust any software product. When it comes to whether a product is really malware in disguise I do trust a bunch of products.

I've never heard of WebRoot so I haven't got a definite opinion, but the fact that I haven't heard of it makes me cautious about the quality of the product if not its intended function.

Is that just a bunch of cr-p? I was wondering that as I wrote it. :D

by jdclyde

And one of the first things I do with a product or company is type in their name and complaints into google to see what it turns up. Never found anything bad about them.

and yes, it is a bunch of crap... :D

by zlitocook

Version but I have used it since it came out. I do not trust most software! When I build a new computer, I install allot of programs and I know at least some of them try to talk to a server.
I run process explorer, zone alarm, a hard ware firewall and a firewall that comes with the ISP service I use. Yes I am paranoid and proud of it.
The Spy sweeper dose a good job but I also use Adaware, CCleaner, window washer and Xsoft.
I run Windows XP and I will run as much as I need to protect my computer. I do not keep any personal information on the computer; I do not use my bank or credit card on line. But I do use Pay PAL, they are now protected, but I don?t trust that ether.
I have ID protection but that only protects you to a point and after that you have to prove you have not spent the money they say you have.

by jdclyde

When I specifically have automatic updates turned off, and the program attempts to contact their site anyways, I am suspect and don't like it.

When I tell something to shut down and it only pretends to, I am suspect and I don't like it.

I was really hoping to find some people that have used this in a corporate environment that could vouch for it or tell me that I am dead on.

As it stands right now, they will not be getting my companies business, nor anyone that asks my opinion of what packages to purchase.

by deepsand

The company is both well esatablished and quite reputable, and its product is considered a trusted application; and, it yields a very low number of false negtives.

My problem with it, that which caused me to stop using it, is that I was observing too many false positives to suit me.

After trying many, I've pretty much settled on Grisoft's AV product (even their free product is industrial strength; but I don't like their new AdWare product), in combination with Spybot Search & Destroy. I occasionally do a sweep with AdAware, but it too yields more false positives than I care to see.

Needless to say, all of this from behind a firewall.

PS - Enabling auto-updates, along with regularly scheduled daily sweeps, are well advised. Grisoft's AVG auto-updates appear almost every day, so that the time that they consume is negligible, are schedulable, and provide for unsurpassed timeliness.

by jerome_mitchell

I have used spysweeper and it kept running processes even when I exit the program.
my computer started to slow down, so I took it to a tech who told me spysweeper WAS spyware.
Never used it again. Now I use spyware doctor along with spyware blaster(auto-updates) and mcafee secuity suit. NO PROBLEMS !!! I also use ad-aware personal as a back up.

by trentr746

I have used Spysweeper in the past, and found it to be a very good product. I have installed in on really badly spyware infected computers, and it does a great job of removing the threats.

However, yes I noticed that it left processes running after it had been shutdown. But did you have both program AND definition files updates turned off? Chances are it was checking for a new definition file.

by mike_parr

I'm usually cautious of an app that carries out unpredictable actions, and I am accutely aware of apps that purport to be saviours when in fact they are malware /adware wrapped up to look like something. However, the fact that these quys were at a computer show you had attended gives some reason to be less sceptical, also check out the review by pc mag [http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1879982,00.asp ]or search [Spysweeper review] (I will always research for reviews on any product/app where possible) they seem to think its a pretty sound product. As for their tech support, all I can say there is persistence is the key, maybe even srop em a line explaining your frustration at not getting a response and that it is influencing your purchase that usually gets the desired response ;)

by jdclyde

but as this is a laptop, I will tell it when I want it to do the updates, and I stay on top of it.

Sure, if this was a users pc I would have the autoupdate going, but I can handle manual just find.

When I am done for the evening, I always have it run either a scan of some sort, defrag, or some other cleanup.

I think in the morning, this will get uninstalled.

by deepsand

For machines that are always up, including my own, I set AVG for auto-updates and scans, SpyBot S&D for manual updates (they're much less frequent that AVG's) with auto-scan, ZoneAlarm for manual updates, and AdAware for both manual updates and scans.

by danlm

I use to run their spy sweeper, but then it expired and I never renewed it. I like webroots products, I have never had any ill effects from their products except for when them and McAfee banged heads once. I got rid of McAfee and not Webroot's product in that instance.

I do not ever remember them trying to call home though when I turned it off.

Dan

by deepsand

For example, Yahoo/Overture use 2 types of cookies. One is used with clients who use thier PPC program; these cookies are use to store a wide variety of user preferences and required data, so as to preserve state in a stateless system such as the Internet. The other is a temporary cookie, with a time-to-live of 30 days, for use in counting the conversions that one realizes via their PPC programs.

Another example is the increasingly widespread use of "Site Keys" by financial sites for the purposes of validating themselves to the user; many of these factoring systems also rely on cookies to provided continuity, i.e. statefullness.

None of these cookies pose any sort of threat to any user, yet, like so many products, WebRoot's fail to make the distinction between those which are benign and beneficial and those which are malevolent in nature or are open to being manipulated for undesirable purposes. The average user, not being sufficiently knowledgeable so as to know which cookies are "good" and which are "bad" will inadvertently allow products like those of WebRoot to remove them, with the result that things no longer work right, and the blame being placed on the affected application or service, rather than on the ham-fisted approach taken by the purveyors of "security" products.

by kclark9

While you are correct about good cookies being removed, this is not the fault of WR, which does allow cookies to be selected for permanence. If users install software, then don't read the instructions, how is this different from any other instance of "user-failure"? Whose fault is it if a car owner can't fill the tank, or change the oil, because he/she never learned where to add it?

I've used WR for several years, and my only real complaint is how slow it is. I don't keep it live online, update it regularly, and try to run it once or twice a month, usually overnight. Experience taught me to shut down everything else I can before running it as well. That includes McAfee, so WR is run offline.

It seems like good software, but care is needed when using. It IS maintenance software, after all.

by notsochiguy

By and large, Spysweeper has performed well. However, we have had some issues with the automatic updates.

Most recently: This past Monday night/Tuesday morning we had an automatic update pushed that seemed to cause sporadic issues. In most cases, a simple reboot cleared the problem. However, in some severe cases (1-2% of our user base), support had to remove Spysweeper entirely, and re-install it to correct the issue.

This wasn't the first time something like this had happened.

by Member 30634329

By and large it works OK. We don't have very many of the SmartShields enabled due to poor performance.
We also have issues with the client management where machines will disappear from the client lists.

by dr dij

it was the only product that caught 100% of stuff thrown at it in tests.

No one product catches everything in real life tho. I've started using trendmicro.com free online spyware sweeper.

Other products show you the keys they found, t does not, which worried me slightly. Webroot trial time I tried it did not remove the problem spyware but showed you the reg keys to remove, and .dll file names.

I'm slightly worried that, in spite of being pretty well locked down, it found something on my work computer. Now I'll have to change all passwords that are important (my $).

by Member 32218214

Spysweeper is by far "the BEST" antispyware program out there. You have to understand that it runs in the background, just like your antivirus program. If it wants to connect to internet to update itself, by all means let it do it. You do (?) update your antivirus program regularly, don't you? If you don't, you are living in a dream world. New malware is created every day. Keeping your programs updated is of paramount importance. By the way, I have used everything... spybot, adaware. Spysweeper gets my vote. Stay away from programs advertized on internet unless you know it is a reputable program. Some of those programs are "not" reputable and download malware with their trial versions. Then they "find" those programs in their initial scan before they ask you for money to fix the problems

by leslie the computer lady

I do not use Spy Sweeper for precisely this reason.
I picked up a computer from a Nursing Home Nurses Station last week and it had spy sweeper on it. When I started the computer it took more than an hour to get to the point of ability to use the mouse.
After installing AVG Spy used to be called Ewido from Grisoft. FREE download. AVG came up with over 5000 threats revealed, after cleaning this up the computer responded faster. Of course more cleaning and tweaking was required before the job was done, but what the heck was Spy Sweeper doing for the Custome I ASK???? Trust IT, I don't think SO.

by flappingcrane

A co-worker asked me to help them with their home computer (the bane of every IT pro's existence; but I like this person, so I said yes). It turns out the family had been running this computer on a direct internet connection for 3 years with NO ANTIVIRUS RUNNING AT ALL. The computer was completely infested with with all manners of viruses, spyware, trojans, the works. I pulled out every trick I had: AdAware, Spybot S&D, HiJack This, Killbox, and Trendmicro's online scanners. There were a pesky few that thwarted every attempt to be removed.
Then I remembered an article I read recently on CNet Reviews about Webroot Spyware Sweeper. It received TOP MARKS from them and several other publications this year. Webroot Spyware Sweeper immediately located all remaining spyware I had found, a few I didn't find, and then completely removed them from the computer. It was incredible. The family says the computer has never worked faster and thank me often.

I don't know why Webroot Spy Sweeper wasn't working on that one computer you saw it on. Maybe the nursing home didn't allow it to update. Maybe someone had disabled the scanning and no one ever turned it back on. Maybe a .dll became corrupted and the software wouldn't run properly. But for the one computer that you saw it do nothing on, I saw one computer on which it worked miracles. I definitely recommend this program to anyone.

by pifflemaster

You said "AdAware, Spybot S&D, HiJack This, Killbox, and Trendmicro's online scanners"... and I've tried a few others as well... however, this program (trial version) pulled the cover off the thing, and ripped out the remaining nasties without a single squawk from the OS. I'm impressed.

by mmemoxie

It seems to me, that this computer only had the SpySweeper program installed and it was never utilized. They, in infamous 'they', only installed it and didn't explain the importance of doing daily routine scans, to protect the computer. Therefore, what you got ... was a BIG mess of Spyware, Malware, Hi-Jackings, so on and so forth.

This is no different than those who install an Anti-Virus program and never update the database. They sit there wondering WHY their computer is not working and full of Viruses, Worms and Trojan Horses.

I will also, bet you dollars to donuts that the Cookie file was as large, as you have ever seen. }:O)

I had a friend, who was infected with the Melissa 97 virus, through an email that she got from one of mutual friends. I got to his computer, since, he did NOT believe me that he was the cause of the infection, to show him. He was using Norton's Anti-Virus. Norton's was NOT the problem, he was. He didn't update the virus database.

I found, with Grisoft's AVG, 103 different infected files with the Melissa 97 virus and 3 more files with a Worm infection. It took me over 10 hours ... to 'clean' up his computer, since, he wouldn't let me re-format the hard drive, due to some business financial files.

I don't blame Norton's Anti-Virus for that ... I blame, my ignorant friend for mess. He knew better, but, was TOO busy to do it.

As Forrest Gump said, "Stupid is ... as stupid does."

by zbatia

I had to choose between Spyware doctor and Sweeper carefully considering pros and cons. Also, I have tested both with a hard-to-remove spyware at one of the customers' desktop. Both of them found the spyware correctly and both were able to remove it. Each of them has the problem. The Spyware doctor "eats" about 50% of CPU utilization in the active monitor mode. The sweeper eats a lot of memory. I bought the Spyware doctor but I use it gently, not in all modes at the same time.

by mmemoxie

I have been reading some confusion on this message thread. Comments are combining two completely different types, of programs. Let us first, clear up what these programs are and what their purpose is.

Webroot's SpySweeper, Lavasoft's AdAware and Kolla's Spybot Search & Destroy are programs that only look for Spyware and Malware ... not Viruses, Worms or Trojan Horses.

Grisoft's AVG is an anti-virus program, which only look for Viruses, Worms or Trojan Horses ... not Spyware and Malware.

Now, as to the validity of the Webroot company, they survived the '.dot com' 2000 crash and have grown in reputation and solid programs. They have been in existence, since 1997 and are well respected in the computer community.

About 2 years ago, I purchased Webroot's SpySweeper. My daughter had been using it, for a couple of years and loved it. I was impressed with it's over all performance. But, as one other person stated here, I didn't really want to pay an $19.95 annual subscription, for getting updates definitions.

However, both types of programs have a common thread ... the need to update the database definitions, as soon as they are available. Updating for these types of programs are paramount, in protecting your computer and/or computer systems.

I use Lavasoft's AdAware SE Plus. Why?Simple, it works and works well. Another thing, that I personally like about AdAware, I purchased their "Plus" program, about 5 years ago and they stated at that time, I would never have to pay for any upgrade. Guess what? They have honored that agreement and I like that. A company that stands behind their word, is rare these days.

Lavasoft's AdAware SE Plus, I allow it to automatically update. I have a DSL 6.0 Extreme, so, that is a no-brainer, for me.

I also, use Kolla's Spybot Search & Destroy, because it is FREE. Plus, it "catches" and removes the couple of odd ball spyware/malware, that may be missed by AdAware. Now, with Kolla's Spybot Search & Destroy, I manually update, before I scan. Where as AdAware uses only one location to update from, Spybot uses several and some just run 'slow as molasses'. Even with DSL 6.0.

Then, to finish off my PC 'clean up', I use Webroot's Window Washer 5.5.

I have been using Webroot's Window Washer, since early 1998 and will NOT be without it, ever. I dearly LOVE that program and trust it completely, since, I have control over the whole thing. I don't update the program. It isn't necessary, since it's only purpose is to remove "cookies". I was using their version 6, but, prefer version 5.5.

I really do love this program, you can set it up do all things automatically or you have the options to do it manually, which is my personal preference.

As to my usage of a Firewall, I have a fantastic one that came with my 2Wire DSL Modem. I am completely 'stealth' on Steve Gibson's Shield's Up scanner, at his website. I have used Zone Alarm and will only use the older version 2.6 of Zone Alarm Pro. The newer version plays havoc with Grisoft's AVG. However, I now only use the hardware firewall that comes with my 2Wire Modem.

Just for those who do not know, the term "Spyware" was coined by Steve Gibson. He became concerned in late 1999 or early 2000 about "spy-bots" that were in Real Player, that were installed on his computer without his knowledge or permission. His 'fight' is legendary and started a whole spyware/malware software industry.

A small note, these are my experiences with these programs, on my personal computers and what I use to install on family and friends computers, that I build, tweak and repair. As for corporate systems, it would seem to me, that the most important aspect would be to have programs that are easy to use, reliable and work.

Bottom line, Webroot is a company that I trust and use.

by wizardb9

I have had nothing but problems with both spy sweeper and symantic products in general lately they seem to be huge resource hogs dragging whole systems down,and uninstalling them can take a few head fakes and jabs to finish the job.All in all I say stay the hell away from anything that causes that much grief.

by vandy-sj

First, I haven't used or installed Spy Sweeper on any of my client's machines, but I recently rescued one that was using Spy Sweeper.

The environment is a business using an intensive database application to run their business, plus three other imaging client applications (4 applications total, no including a web browser). PCs are all P4-2.0GHz running XP Pro with 512MB of RAM. All systems are behind a dedicated perimeter firewall appliance with 6.0M DSL broadband service.

One senior exec (technically challenged) installed Spy Sweeper on his own PC, and by probably not configuring it (or not knowing how to configure it), the default installation and settings were using a large amount of his system resources. This caused his primary 'business application' to slow to a crawl. After detecting Spy Sweeper on his machine and determining it as the system drain, I disabled it from starting up and system performance was restored after rebooting.

I don't know that much about Spy Sweeper, but in this environment on this PC it was a detriment. After verifying Spy Sweeper as the resource problem I uninstalled Spy Sweeper, and the PC is now performing normally again.

You may laugh, but all of these business machines are currently running Windows Defender antispyware - with no performance drain and no infections (so far). Windows Defender auto updates and runs scheduled scans everyday.

Years earlier I also removed Norton AntiVirus from their business and installed McAfee VirusScan Enterprise Edition (currently v8.0). Where previously Norton AV had created so many server and desktop related problems, McAfee Enterprise has been nearly flawless (an occassional auto update problem on one or two machines) and removed several infections that Norton didn't find. McAfee Enterprise has also not affected system performance like Norton AV did. Not a single virus infection since the McAfee installation.

I've heard lots of complaints about McAfee's consumer retail products, but since I don't use them I can't comment.

by pimike

I have a utility called Binman, and without fail when it is scanning it will stop and the file displayed is always the same one. It will only do this if SpySweeper is clicked on to start with Windows. Niether AdAware, Spybot nor Spyware Doctor have this effect on the scan of the Binman temp file cleaner although these all start up with Windows.

by kretsch1

I have run Adaware, Spybot and Zondex(Virusbuster) for years without problems. I use and like Window Washer and took their cheap upgrade for SpySweeper. It seemed OK but did get a lot of false positives (I 'Googled" some of them and could not find them anywhere else). Then I made the mistake of letting it have its head and it completely "gutted" the registry and lost all my settings and preferences. Took ages to get everything sorted. I dont use it anymore.
Try 'Googling" what it says it finds.

by agent 77

for a long time now, and find it to be very reliable. It has never once affected my registry adversely, nor has it missed any malware. I liked it when I could use the free version and just uninstall / reinstall when the trial period ran out because I am just a poor boy trying to raise 3 kids.

RE: the whole Norton thing...yes it takes resources to run ANY program in the background, and Norton sure gets it's fair share of them; but I will NEVER AGAIN use a McAfee product after the ordeal I went through trying to configure, and subsequently uninstall one of their products after I finally gave up trying to configure. I think it was a firewall problem, and I wasn't quite as proficient as I am now with some of those things.

Makes me a little teary eyed thinking of the good old days before the internet and all it's bad sides, when all you had to do was write the program, and run it, and the world was good. :-(

by buzzwang

We used to run the Entrprise edition of SpySweeper. We ran it for 9 months on about 400 machines.

After figuring out (repeatedly!) that SpySweeper was missing even the most basic and generic forms of spyware, and reporting it to Support time and again and being told that it was not deemed as a threat, we pulled it from all of our machines and cancelled the support agreement in a hopeless attempt to save some money.

We were also looking for an antivirus replacement at the time (since McAfee is just not well liked, and had more than a few problems with our machines and network layout).

We decided to swithc to Sophos AV after a lot of testing of different products, mostly becuase of the integrated antispyware component. It was just upgraded to a new version recently and works well. We still have some issues with it, and that is more because of the uniqueness of our environment, but it works well, catches spyware and viruses regularly and otherwise requires little maintenance on my part.

I'm the guy that installed it for the company and is responsible for it by the way.

by razzinator

I bought a copy and it messed up so much I uninstalled it. Then a couple months later read a review and decided to give it another try. But it wouldn't accept my activation code. I emailed tech about it and a couple weeks later they sent me an email describing a fix that didn't work.
I finally just trashed the program and try to steer my customers clear of it when I can.

by asbin

Have been using for over a year and have no problems. Works fine, but as other people suggested you may need to combine with other spyware removal progs when things get tough

by dirtylaundry

I have used Webroot's Spysweeper and found:

1- was a resource hog
2- would not shut down all processes when I quit the program
3- aggressive marketing via emails
4- SpyBot S&D caught things Webroot didn't
5- would not recommend to clients.

Although SpyBot S&D is free, I do donate yearly to them.

I can't imagine the combination of Norton AV and Webroot on a system's performance.

I tolerate Symantec's Norton AV because they have improved the GUI and I need to become familiar with it as their marketing has been successful in the Home User front so it is a matter of understanding the program well for my clients. Otherwise, I would have gone with McAfee's Enterprise (yes, their home products are not as thorough nor user friendly)

Spybot's home page:
http://www.spybot.info/

by charles.thompson

It caused problems with my VPN connection from home. Our Administrator, nor Juniper's people could figure out what was wrong. This went on for a week, then I uninstalled SpySweeper my problem disapeared.

by dave 628

I cannot speak to the enterprise version, but as someone who builds and networks home computers I consider it a valuable part of my defenses and recommend it highly to those people whose computers I work on.

I used to be a loyal Norton SystemWorks customer, until that product became an unbearable, steaming pile of horse manure (talk about a resource hog!) that couldn't perform any of its advertised functions, and could only be uninstalled by formatting the hard drive. I similarly banned McAfee products from my computers after they bought the highly reliable SpamKiller, brought it under their umbrella, and forced you to install a load of unnecessary McAfee resource-eating garbage in the background. Both of these companies have given up on the home user, and are just basically stealing people's money.

I have been using Webroot SpySweeper for three years now on my machines and other home user machines that I am responsible for, without a single complaint from any of the machines or the people using them. The machines I've installed this product on vary from a Dell with a 700 MHz Celeron and 512 MB of RAM to a home-built with a Pentium III at 1 GHz and 768 MB of RAM, to a home-built running an overclocked Pentium 4 with multiple raid set ups for video editing--they all run this product without any of the problems I've seen mentioned here. The only time I see a drag on resources is when the program is performing a full system scan, something it does a very in-depth job of.
For you folks who claim it does not allow you to shut down certain processes, one of the features of this program is that it prevents infection by root kits, one of the shields that it runs in the background. It also flags when new programs are trying to make suspect registry changes; while some might see this as "false positives", the program is in fact doing its job! Regarding "phoning home", the program regularly receives updated spyware lists just as antivirus programs receive new antivirus definitions--it does this whether you want to receive updates to the main program or not.

Researching, and reading (on more than one technical site) that no one single anti-spy ware program catches everything, and liking the fact that it does things in real time that the other programs don't, I consider it part of a multi-pronged defense. Because I was trying different things after abandoning SystemWorks, my three computers have three different set ups. Two computers use Computer Associates eTrust Antivirus (this computer has the enterprise version, the other uses the consumer version), and computer number three uses Zone Alarm Internet Security Suite, which includes the consumer version of eTrust Antivirus. The first two computers also run Zone Alarm Pro. All are additionally sitting behind a router that uses a hardware firewall. The other anti-spy ware products that I use are AdAware Pro (this computer) and AdAware SE (the other two computers), along with Spybot Search and Destroy on all three.
While all these programs mostly remove cookies because the real threats have been blocked, EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM gives you a choice about what keys are removed, quarantines the removed cookies by dates, gives you the ability to restore them! (This is for you folks who aren't paying attention to what your programs are doing, or learning the features of the programs so that you can put back things that were accidentally removed). Learn how your programs work, and you won't lose things that are VITAL to your operations!

I want to mention one other thing that was barely mentioned in the previous threads--there are several programs being advertised on the Internet which claim to be anti-spy ware programs, and some people are inadvertently being led down a path because the names of these programs use a "play" on spelling or wording to make their name sound like the name of a real and trusted program that actually does some good. These "sound alike" programs quite often install MORE spyware and pop ups on your machine and give a black eye to the programs that they are pretending to be--make sure you haven't installed one of these before trashing the name of a program that actually does some good.

By the way, since installing the Zone Alarm/Webroot Spysweeper/eTrust Antivirus/AdAware/Spybot Search and Destroy line of defenses, my computers are running much faster, and I'm not experiencing the daily problems/crashes/lockups that I had when I was running Norton SystemWorks. For those of you who still run SystemWorks (or any Symantec security product), I pray for you that it does not randomly unregister itself one day as mine did (and as it has for several thousand other customers--just look at their user forums), causing the only system infection I've ever had--after all the other troubles I had experienced with their products, that was the last straw.

Webroot SpySweeper-- I trust it thoroughly, and highly recommended it!

by deepsand

And, not all versions of Spy Sweeper provide for telling it which cookies to ignore.

Furthermore, WB has repeatedly failed to either reply to my missives to them pointing out such problems, or modified their files so as to no longer flag as "dangerous" any of the specific groups of cookies that I've documented for them as being either necessary or benign. Of course, they are not the only provider of security products that has repeatedly ignored my having provided such information.

by deepsand

the results of its scan(s).

Bear in mind that, when a security product quarantines a threat, as opposed to removing it, it sequesters it into an area controlled by it. As a result, another product may detect the presence of the threat, but not recognize that it has been quarantined, and therefore deem the application that has corraled that threat to itself be a threat!

When multiple products are used for the same purpose, one must take into account such interactions, and interpret the scan results accordingly.

by shuja52

No this is not the case, but the difference is : While the spybot attck the files /registry infected but sometimes not able to uninstall it complete;ly form the system but the x-cleaner can do. I trust ewido (now avg)against webroot's Spybot

by shuja52

In my opinioin the Spybot having lot of problem, I use x cleaner and ewido combination, since then our PCs works fine.

by deepsand

you find Spy Sweepers remedial actions inferior to those of some other products.

Yet, you here state "webroot's [i]Spybot[/i]."

As it seems that you are confusing products, you should understand that Spy Sweeper and Spy Bot are different products. More importantly, while Spy Bot [i]Search and Destroy[/i] is a legitimate product, there are imitators, using the name Spy Bot which are malevolent.

My above comment above was the WebRoot's [i]Spy Sweeper[/i] is [b]not[/b] spy-ware. And now, I must also also assert that the same is true of [i]Spy Bot [b]Search and Destroy.[/b][/i] Any "security" product that says other wise is, at best, mistaken; at worst, it is in attempt to get you to remove legitimate products so as to ease the path for malware!

by tjh1965

I usually get a few hits when I sweep my computer daily. Suddenly, a couple of weeks ago Spysweeper stopped finding anything. It simply tells me everything is fine. This seems unusual.

I don't think it is possible that there is nothing there to catch. Has anyone else seen this happening?

This discussion is closed to new replies.