9 replies
by mrjay67
There is nothing in my emails or life for that matter that I have to hide for legal reasons. However that doesnt mean I want the govt reading and monitoring my email. If there is probable cause then get the warrant and search me or my email. Now if there is something suspicious and they have some proof but need more then maybe monitoring is OK. Perhaps in trying to find a terrorist, serial killer or some other high crimes. With any of this there should still be a high rate of suspicion or probable cause. These kind of things need to be done properly. No one wants anyone, govt or other wise, spying or monitoring their actions.
I know there are those out there that might say if you're not doing anything illegal than why should it matter. Well its just a matter of privacy. There are things of personal nature that people dont want others to see and it has nothing to do with legality.
If the govt wants to catch people and they say they are going to be monitoring or it evercomes out that they likely are,(with factual evidence not just paranoid suspcion) then the whole plan goes to crap anyway. The whole idea just opens a big can of worms on many levels. Its a bad idea.
my 2 cents
Jason
Yea, sure - Mr. "User Deleted" is asking a question about, of all things, spying and secrecy.
How do we know who you are, what you are, what you'll do with this information?
Wait, what's that? Is that a black helicopter I hear hovering above?
Define "government" - which branch, which agency, etc.
Qualify the conditions - from "unfettered" to "under special circumstances", with or without warrants, with or without justification, etc.
Define "our" - Who is "our"? Everybody? Specific people? Etc.
Without a clearer and better-defined premise, the question is open to too much paranoid interpretation.
by timwalsh
by road-dog
where vast amounts of Internet traffic is ported through the NSA. They have software that scrubbs the transmissions looking for keywords. If a transaction profile has a lot of hits for these keywords, then the "conversation" is flagged for further study.
As I understand it this is legal, as there is no manual intervention until a threshhold of keywords is met. I suspect that a warrant is needed (riiiiight) to intercept and record traffic.
by admin
to track anything going through your network. i didn't realize how important routing really was in the past. it's potential power is enormous.
Of course, "No Such Agency" is not bound by the same set of rules that law enforcment follows and for good reason. If you look at the NRO (whose existance was declassified in 1992) and ECHELON you can easily infer what is generally happening with internet communication. It is of interest to note that while we lay people like to still believe in the gadget ridden "James Bond" world of spying, actually it is turning more and more to the oldest technology- human intellect- which is much harder to track. Odd that a goat herder residing in caves is more of a challenge than I to the NSA and their theirkin, but oh well, I'm really not that interesting anyway! :)
by hal 9000
by hal 9000
by hal 9000
This discussion is closed to new replies.
Trending Security posts
Sort by Trending