Comfort is a very subjective thing. It could be that some one is comfortable with secure software or with configurable, or an OS they can experiment with...
There are several distros attempting to be MS like, as in they try to appeal to what might be called appliance users. As in non-tech people who make their choices based on a small subset of very specific applications.
If MS hadn't thought of those appliance users at home mainly but some cross over into business they would be dead. It's only their anti-competitive practices and their marketing power that helped them survive the appalling quality of their operating system, something their target market doesn't really care about.
Of what possible benefit to any one except MS as a business is the destruction of open source?
Why do you think MS quality in terms of standards, security and robustness has improved?
Apple? The goodness of their hearts? Quality is an overhead in business where there is no effective competition.
Open source my man, they couldn't put them out of business, because fundamentally they aren't commercial.
Their only way of competing was quality.
Be careful what you wish for, you might get it....