5 replies
by erikdr
Just like a normal Internal Audit Department. So a few briefs:
- Reporting to a level as high as possible in the organisation
- Not having rights to decide on security, but to write audits (...) as an
advice to the owners of the information systems. It's up to those owners to make the cost/benefit tradeoff; but of course very -- ratings threatening to give the whole company a - rating are usually serious enough for this owner to invest in improvements.
- Make the distinction between the things the IT Operational department is responsible for and the things the business owner is (together with development).
- Maybe also having functional segegration between IT Audit and the department which makes the corporate security standards. This way, Audit doesn't get tempted to modify the standards a bit to reflect reality.
At your service,
- The Netherlands
by golteanu
by ustutz
Agree with beginning of previous answer - just like any other audit department.
Pick experienced and competent (technically and managerically) personnel to staff the department. Technical skills geared to the IT systems in use in your company.
Auditors need to have copies of / be proficient in all external regulatory documentation, as well as internal (company) policies and procedures.
Auditors need to know that they are the CEO's tool rather than an end in themselves or makers of policy. The audit answers "Do we follow procedure?" and "Does procedure work?", not "Do I agree with procedure?"
Team size and composition is a function of size and composition of IT/IS department(s). Should have subject matter expert (SME) for each major auditable function and technology. (not neccessarily separate SMEs, but designated responsibilities).
Sample responsibilites / work areas:
Security, Asset Accountability, Business/Customer Support, Consulting/Outsourcing Accountability, Project Managment.
by golteanu
by golteanu
This discussion is closed to new replies.
Trending Security posts
Sort by Trending