Manager Replaced - Suggestions needed

BigAbe,
'You can't fight city hall'. All offices are not entities unto themselves, just groups of people following directives, and as such, they are political. That's just the way it is.
Even if you win, you will be labeled as a 'troublemaker' or 'not a team player', either of which will kill your chances of career advancement faster than a New York minute.
Are you sure you are aware of the whole scenario? What if your new director was appointed to completely overhaul the IT department by higher management and decided to 'clean house'? What if your old job is to be out-sourced and your replacement doesn't need the same skills you had? Somewhere up the ladder, someone decided to put him where he is and the bottom line is he has no obligation to explain his actions to you.
An IT manager directs the people and software needed to maintain the information infrastructure systems; he does not influence company business directives or policies. As such, he is usually regarded by business managers as a tool. As long as the tool is dependable and gets the job done, fine - if not, buy a new one.
Are you prepared to lose your job? If you confront your new director, he will probably arrange that, if for no other reason than because you questioned his authority. He is motivated to prove to the people who appointed him that he is doing his job well, and will not like you putting a different light on that.
Unpalatable as they may be, your choices are basically 1) accepting your new position 2) fighting and eventually losing more than you already have, or 3) moving to a different company.
Whatever you do, weigh ALL the factors and consider the worst consequences before acting. If you're SURE you can deal with that, then go ahead and fight him.

I work in the government, and this happens all the time. A new Chief drags in his head toady, someone usually only competent in telling the boss what a great guy he is. Would you have felt comfortable staying in that department and competing for the attention of the director? If your salary and benefits have stayed about the same, then it looks like they are giving you an opportunity to add to your resume. Learn all you can about QA, and, keep out of the unpleasantness in your old department. I call these experiences "just another chapter in the book I will write when I retire".

At 53, I am daily saddened to see the sorry state to which communication skills have devolved in the USA. To see people take pride in such ignorance bodes poorly for our nation's future.
I also saw the terrible spelling and grammar in BigAbe's posting, but wasn't sure it this was the proper forum in which to point them out as the guy seemed to have enough problems already.
But I agree that a lot of his problems may come from his own lack of attention to detail as evidenced in his message. Typing errors happen to anyone, but repeatedly spelling 'pursue' as 'persue' is not typing, that is either 1) laziness or 2) not caring enough to proofread.
Like it or not, as IT managers or engineers in any discipline, we must communicate our ideas and recommendations to others, be they managers or customers, and in doing so, are ambassadors or representatives of our companies or departments, and messages like BigAbe's would embarass any business manager.
Street language and grammar belongs where it came from - in the street, not the boardroom or even inter-departmental emails.
If you can't take pride in the work you do, then you shouldn't be doing the work. In this day of virtually limitless free spelling checkers, on-line grammar and writing help sources, there is no excuse for such poor language skills but laziness.
If someone knows they have poor spelling or grammar skills, then they should take the time to proof-read and use some tools to check their work. If they don't want to bother, then that says a lot about their sense of pride in the work they do. If mediocrity in his work is acceptable to him, then he should accept mediocrity in his career aspirations.
Last year I was 'downsized' as a systems integration engineeer from a telecom manufacturing company having business problems, and found another job in only 2 months with another telecom firm. The person who hired me told me he was atracted by my written communcation skills, which were sorely in need of being improved among present engineering staff, and that he expected me to contribute to such improvement by example and active training.

Getting to the bottom of the situation may mean that you just have to bite the bullet and ask the person that made the changes. HRO is not a good candidate for clearing this up since they are likely to parrot management so go to the top if this is burning in your gut and you just have to know why. Make this a one time shot. If you get an answer then all well and good but, if you do not get what you're looking for...leave it alone and get on with your new position. At will means just that...they can fire you or you can quit at will. Personally, I would seek employment elsewhere if the company that I was working for treated me in that fashion.

Hi,
If your feel you need to know the reason for your displacement, then I would suggest you go for it all the way, even if it meanes having to change jobs.
There is no doubt in my mind when it comes to Self Respect and Honor, and I sense you feel dishonored by this situation.
Regards,

I strongly agree with the post that was submitted by Cindi, aka "techwannabe". In a situation suchas this one, you really do need to take a self assesment of your marketable skill set. Remember that you are still in control of your career but you only have about six months of sanity to turn things around for yourself. Sugar coating your situation is not what is needed here. Go ahead and polish up your resume and begin a new job search just to be on the safe side. Others have posted here that your company still has regard for you and would like to keep you around. That is definitely subject to interpretation and whether or not you are wearing those new hi-tech Rayban rose colored glasses. Let the truth be known that your days at this place are in fact numbered. The powers that be have given you a definitive sign that they would rather have you continue practicing your chosen craft elsewhere. It's just business, which can be rather harsh sometimes.

Now that you are no longer a virgin, check with your state's Employment Developement Department for information on training assistance to upgrade your skills. These services are of no cost to you and are available to persons regardless of whether they are unemployed, under employed, or have earned a PhD degree. Political fallout suchas this happens all the time and it will continue to happen as long as free trade exist. So roll with this punch and carefully plan out your next move. Afterall, your career and future is your hands and you should not allow for a company to dictate its path. Hold on to this job until you find another; thank them for the experiences you all shared then bid them a fond fairwell.

.
I concur with the above message. What a great bit of advice.

.
I concur with the above message. What a great bit of advice.

Perhaps QA as in need of cleanup and the director deemed that you were the best person to get them cleaned up. I know a couple of individuals who are used by management as "troubleshooters." They go into a problem department and apply their people and organizational skills to mold them into a team that is highly organized and efficient.

Think of this as an opertunity to sharpen your "management" Skills while you take your time and quietly seek new employment. Keep in mind that in some industries QA experience is very valuble.

I recently walked out of a company paying me $87K because they began using the "corrective actions policy" as a method of reducing staff. They were running people off that had been with the company as much as 15 years with clean records. They started inventing reasons to place folks on corrective action to force them to retire or resign. The day they pulled it on me I walked out of the meeting and directly to HR to turn in my ID. When a company's management loses it's integrity and can no longer be honest with employees, that's the day to leave. I had to tell myself, "what would I do if I wasn't afraid?". Since I left, friends have told me I look 10 years younger and my wife says I'm sleeping more soundly than I had in the last few years. We sometimes dont' recognize what job stress does to us, but others do. My advise is don't be afraid. I'm doing the 'independent consultant' thing currently and love the freedom to pick the jobs I want, and when to work. Yes I have bills to pay, but I'm more in control of all of that then when I worked for "the company". If they can't be straight up with you and tell you why you were removed, then walk out now.

You did read the story, right? How do you expect him to "get a positive job reference"?

My advice, for what it's worth, happily work in your new position while diligently looking for another job - stay in your foxhole and don't draw attention to yourself.

The ?why? doesn?t really matter at this point but how you deal with this does. Yes, it grinds that no explanation was given and, unless otherwise written, very much within the parameters of ?at-will? employment.

Two schools of thought:
Positive - You have created and/or managed an environment/process(s) that work so well, a novice can step in and learn the ropes with ease while the department carries on and, there is an expectation you?ll do the same for QA.

Negative - The motivation behind the move may be the new director?s own fears of deficiency. He may know a great deal about QA (thus, an ?upper hand?) and little about IT. Who better to reveal his short-comings than one who is exceptional in this realm? It could have been a political move on his part or even further up, with somebody pulling your new director?s strings. Just to name a few.

First, you state, ?I have a spotless record, and received outstanding performance reviews every year.?

In looking towards the positive ? great! Do your best to garner those outstanding performance reviews and maintain that spotless record. Who knows what you can achieve? It may also put you in a position for advancement (his replacement?) because you now possess a greater depth of knowledge ? with a proven track record of success - in the company as a whole.

Second, you state, ?Should I go to the director or HR? ? I am basically concerned, that if I do pursue this issue, I would be black balled and eventually let go for something.?

If you prefer the negative ? caution! In most cases HR will never know the ?real? reason (depends on your particular corporate atmosphere and structure) but will record whatever PC reason is given to them. It will take some time on your part to determine the nature of this transfer. I?m sure you possess the skills it takes to read this other person and find their motivation - it?s a basic, required quality for successful management. Once you determine the key factor it?s up to you to work with it rather than against it. For example, if it is due to the director?s insecurities, you?ll need to come up with ways to allay those fears. It may take a situation where he makes a huge misstatement on all things IT and you keep your mouth shut. Work it out with him in private and offer a solution he can bring forward to correct it and be the hero.

Finally, regardless of the road you choose, it boils down to moving past this and making it work or moving on.

What a relief to hear from someone from the profession that doesn't swing on the corporate swingset. You gave some great advice! I had my staff read this because the IT business is ruthless.

Why didn't you ask whatever questions you had when the change was first presented to you. Theoretically you can't be black balled. By law previous employers can only verify your lengh of employment and your position. They are not allowed to comment on how well you did the job. Also if your record is as good as you say, even if they did try to black ball you, you have in writing (hopefully) copies of all of your past reviews...don't you? The bottom line is that as an at will employee the company doesn't need a reason to let you go.

BigAbe what's your initial gut say about it. I'm sure somewhere in the past, people around you and management gave you clues as to what might come down in the future.

80% of the reason people get fired, and 80% of the reason people look for another job is they don't get along with others, not job performance.

If someone doesn't like you or if a majority of peers complain about you for whatever reason, they will try different tactics to get rid of you. Demotion, cutting you out of the loop, isolating you and if you don't get that hint, then they start trying to find other ways.
MHO, take this time to dust off your resume update it, and start an active search for another job. Once you start doing that, if the aloofness, isolation, and being cut out of the loop from peers and management ease off you then you'll know they want you out.

but I would have appreciated it more if you completed the answer to my first request. You have me mystified since it appears you are addressing spell check from within the forum. I know how to do it outside the forum and bring it in but not how to do it from within. Please advise
as I really would like to know. I hope the weather
was nice and you had a HAPPY CANADA DAY.

What I have done on many occasions was to type the reply in a word processing program and use its spell check feature. Once satisfied I would simply 'cut and paste' the reply into the forum posting box.

Couldn't agree more... being over 45 almost guarantees the cards will be stacked against you. IT has always tended to be a young mans game and ageism has always been rampant within this industry. When it comes to hiring, equal qualifications and sometimes even better experience mean little if you're unlucky to be in the upper age bracket. Most employers tend to develop a specific corporate "culture" within their organizations...some of them almost developing into a sort of "family" association depending on the size of the company or department. For a small company this can work well, but it doesn?t bode well for the guy who doesn't fit the general age bracket of that particular group. Of course age discrimination is against the law but almost impossible to prove. No right minded employer is gonna say " sorry you didn't make the cut 'cause your too damn old... go away old man"... not unless he wants to stay out of the court room that is. Trial lawyers feast on that kind of stuff. No... If your in the upper age bracket, best to tread carefully lest you remain on the unemployment line for the rest of your days. Early retirement may not be what you planned.

Judging from some of the words that were misspelled in your request for comment, there is a possibility that management wanted someone with a better ability to communicate and/or a little more polish. Just for grins, seek a consultation with a local educator and get an evaluation. A little work on language and spelling and you might impress management to the point you could be considered for a better position.

I was also a IT Manager for a company where I had worked for 11 years, 8 of them in Management. With the recent bankruptcy, the company laid off 15000 workers, including myself. There was no criteria given as to how it was decided which call centers would loose the IT Managers and which will take over the ones that no longer have one left. Everyone I had worked for in the company was surprised to learn about my name being on the list and let me know. But the recent re-org had put me under a new Director who had his own favorites. Now I am looking for work without a source of income wishing I had jumped ships at the first sign of trouble. So trust me when I say, it could have been worst. If you rather not deal with the stress of working in your current environment, take advantage of the fact that you still have a job and start looking.

Good advice! Keep your head down. But with the stress that you are under, you also need to have someone in your corner. See an off-site councelor as soon as possible. The yellow pages are full of agencies that provide professional advice for employees who are victims of office politics and bullying. If you are one of the lucky few IT employees who have a union, run don't walk to your shop steward or other union representative. But whether you are unionised or not, see the councellor. You don't need a psychiatrist, but a well experienced industrial psychologist will give you the advice you need in order to cope with what is happening so that you can make decisions that will be to your advantage. Most union and some non- union employers offer an Employee and Family Assistance Plan that will pay for three or more sessions with a councellor. Ask you union rep, if you have one, or ask your HR manager for a referral. If no EFAP program exists, get your doctor to refer you to a councellor. Your mental health should be your main concern at a time like this.

constructive criticism is okay, but you should always make sure your ducks are in a row, "social skills kick in and on of them is clear", either you forgot the e or you cant spell one. Second, "concice" was spelled concise last time I checked. The guy needed advice, not you tooting you own horn. My advice to Abe, LSP (low sober profile) until you can move on.

.
Compared to many messages that appear in these threads, his was outstanding. It's quite easy to miss a letter in a word, or have a missing or misplaced comma here or there. And not taking the time or effort for proof reading and spell checking in a situation such as this is certainly understandable.

Besides, how would you like it if someone pointed out your grammatical errors in these threads?

You have misspelled words (concise and boardroom), you have missing commas and sentence fragments, and you didn't capitalize everywhere it's required, and so on.

The thing about correcting someone's grammar and spelling is that it may have a tendency to come back and bite you in the you-know-what.

(No, I didn't proof read this or send it through a spell-checker. Gee, I hope I got it all right.)

Take it for what it's worth, but my intention is only to offer a bit of "food for thought".

Why do these discussions so often break down into juvenile "pissing matches?" Does anyone still remember the point of this discussion? A little RELEVANT digression is reasonable but diatribes and personal attacks on styles are not what we need for this topic.

sleeping dog, step down off your pedestal and reread your own post. Some of your points are well taken. As we move from technician to manager, we need to focus more on the management skills without losing sight of our technical abilities.

I was in a similar situation couple of years ago,

After 6 years as a Sr.Developer/Consultant was reassigned to QA/BuildManagement/Version control. Salaray did not change, but I had no prior exp. with the kind of work that had to be done. I kept communication channels open with the new director, and other mangers in the organization, 3 months into my new position I found out, that the Director for the Qa/BM/VC was thinking of leaving the firm in 6 months and they wanted me to be 'groomed' before he left to take charge of the entire division. They did not want to inform any one about the departure, too much in advance. I now head the Change Management division.

My guess is that, you are good at what you do and know the current organization procedures and the management thinks you are the right person for the job.

Try to join the ASQ user group in your area and get seriously interested in change management/QA.If you have the budget get yourself an outside consultant to train you in QA procedures and get a crash course in it.

Good luck, I hope things work out well for you.

Some forced moves or even demotions are a result of managers fearing that: a) they know that you know more than them, b) they realise that you could do their job better, c) you could do more in the organisation once freed of the restrictions of your old position.
Some new managers believe that they must make organisational changes just to be seen to be doing something or justifying their importance to the organisation. Others are tasked with making the organisational changes that their own managers are mandating.
Don't be too disheartened by the move. If you have a good work performance and your annual reviews illustrate this, then finding a better position should present no big issues.
But make sure your references are always current. If necessary, chase down your old director if he/she would be willing to write you a reference.
Don't try chasing up the reasons for the change of position if you know for a fact that it was not related to poor performance. It can label you within the organisation as a problem.

What has happened to you is known as a constructive dismissal. I'm not sure about the US, but in Canada this is grounds for taking job action with the labour board to get your job back.

In reply to DC_GUY... Are you serious? Do you want to work for a company that has NO regard for your rights as an employee? That is a frightening position, and is a good example of why unions have become necessary in our world.

After what this director did, would you even want to work for him/her? Not worth the effort. You may get your way and end up under him/her and that would probably be a nightmare.

My two cents...

Duh? Guess I was speaking too technically for you but I'll take another shot at it.
I'll match my technical skills aginst anyone and for that matter my management skills as well.
How many people do you know who can code Assembler
never mind COBOL, FORTRAN, BASIC,VB, C and C++, ADA, LISP and a few others which are best forgotten. How many systems have you designed, set up, and brought on line as well as integrated for Fortune 500 companies including NASA. In the past five years have you started a company in your garage with 3 of your buddies, mind you with yourself as controlling shareholder, and grown it so that it now has 9 partners and 187 employees spread across 7 offices in the US and Canada. In that time we've lost 2 employees one by accident and one fired. If by any chance you've achieved something similar how many offices are you hoping to open in Asia, Britain and perhaps Europe within the next two years????
Still reading?????? Hmmmmmm???? If you noted anything I was trying to point out to BigAbe it often isn't enough to be a good technician or a good manager. At a certain point, like it or not, some social skills become necessary. One of these is communications and nothing will label you as quickly as poor linguistics in communications. I know you will say things like that shouldn't matter but for some people, unfortuneately, they do. However, that's not an incurable condition. Courses are available to rectify the matter and shouldn't take much more than a semester or two at a community college. Sometimes its a matter of manners or personal hygene. That means no farting at the dinner table or in church and for God's sake brush your teeth and take a shower. One of my
own personal faux pas is in the matter of dress. I
positively hate dressing in shirts and ties my tastes running more to Levi and/or denim shirts and pants and my assistant is always on my back to
wear something more appropriate for meetings with
outsiders. My response is usually that I'm the boss and majority shareholder and I'm the only one I have to impress. Sometimes I admit she's right as last week I was in a meeting being totally ignored. I think they thought I was the janitor and it wasn't until several of my cohorts
kept asking for my opinion that it finally dawned on them that I was the guy with the veto and they better be nice to me. All very amusing. What I'm talking about is "Mahogany Row" level of management and if it hasn't been acquired at lower management levels you'll never get past middle management. Whatever it is they are all skills that can be learned and are taught somewhere. In my company we even pay for the courses. Mind you now; no slurping your tea from the saucer and point the little finger when drinking from your cup unless you are dining with a Philistine like me where it's coffee in a mug and don't spill any on me or my desk. You'll note
while I don't follow the procedures I do know what
they are and thus I know my way around a drawing room, dining room and board room and yet can still
fit in down at the corner bar or tavern. For me it's just another set of skills to be turned on or off as the situation warrants.

When it comes to poor or non-existent typing skills I readily admit I'm a complete klutz. Spelling, while important in more formal arenas, really isn't crucial in these forums. However, poor grammar is an entirely different matter. Nothing labels your social origins as readily as the grammar used in one's communications formal or
informal. Social origin shouldn't matter but in the cold light of the real world it often does and as I pointed out it isn't incurable. Community colleges have courses that can rectify the matter; in fact they even have courses in a whole slew of social skills. I did not create the circumstances or the situation BigAbe finds himself in nor do I approve of it. All I was saying is that the potentiality of what could be happening can be dealt with in a semester or two at a community college or someother type of school.
I am beginning to think grammar skills are not the only thing lacking. Perhaps reading and comprehension skills could use some reinforcement for certain people. Reverting to a colloquialism,
"Geez people, get a grip." I am not now nor did I ever say this was how I see him; It's how he may be perceived by others. In fact I quite specically
said his written communications could make one wonder if his oral skills were equally dismal. An analogy might be if you put a flashy cover on a phone book and a plain brown wrapper on the newest
best seller; it would be the phone book that gets picked up first. I know we aren't supposed to judge a book by it's cover but face it; in real life that is exactly what happens.
For whatever it's worth I use the Columbus typing
method; Find the right key and land on it.

Bigabe, after reading all the various posts, even the side tracked ones, I can only agree with the common thread that there's more here than you have the "power" to over turn. Doing the best job possible in your new QA role, staying out of the politics and applying your greatest energies to seeking another position, will best weather you through these troublesome seas. If it helps you, I am in a somewhat similar situation. Where it differs from your circumstances is that as App Dev Manager my job hasn't changed per se but the newly appointed Director had elevated his "wife" (recently the former Director's secretary) to a peer management position, and did so by carving out part of my responsibilities as well as the Manager of Network Services. Needless to say, this has not been optimal for the organization much less for myself. Our IT group is under the same department as our HR group, Corporate Services. So, with no nonpartisan peers to speak with and bring attention to so serious an issue, my current objective has been to "do the best job I can, stay out of the politics (specifically the "royal flush" politics, my pet name for this management pair) and spend my valuable energies on seeking another position. It's been a year now since all this has transpired. The outcome so far - I'm not just a survivor but I've also gained valuable leadership/management skills in dealing with the fallout of this untenable situation. This I can take with me anywhere. Sadly, I too am facing "ageism" as I am time and time again the "best candidate for the job" but always come in second. I am still very hopeful as many of my skills include both technical and understanding the business. By the way, we Canadians tend to be a verbose group but we do have kinship with the trials and tribulations of all working peoples, management or otherwise. Good luck Bigabe!

Hi Richards - Here's that damnable dog again!
We have no idea why a new manager was brought in.
What happened to the previous manager? Did he get
discharged for cause? If so, are his subordinates
being tarred with the same brush and if so, why?
Maybe BigAbe has an inflated ego or sense of his
own capabilities. Who knows? T'is not I and most
certainly not you. Maybe my previous conclusion that the new manager was a snob and/or just plain
didn't like BigAbe is correct. Unfortunately, we'll never know as BigAbe hasn't seen fit to inform us as to the resolution of this matter.
Empathy has a place but I feel constructive criticism would be a better choice especially if it is viewed as such and in the proper spirit.

If you were demoted within the company then they have to give you a legitimate and logical answer. With the reaction that it is okay to let them demote you allows time for outside sources to view you as "knowing you have done something wrong or are not working up to you priorities within the job culure." You should have demanded the situation to be taken care of when it took place. There are other sources that can help you with the position that you are in if they did not give you an explanation. But of course, usually those people who seek for help and get the help deserved don't usually stay within the same company. If your record and evaluations where clear as you say. Then you should have gone to the source until you found your answer. It is very unlikely they demoted you just because they did not like you. There had to have been a negative track record, unless change for the organization. If so, then the person who they hired would have had to have better skills or a diploma of some sort, something you did not have that they needed.

From what little you wrote, I would say that the company you work for is not one to be trusted. A company that does not work with you in an honest fashion by explaining to you why you are being transferred, is very suspect. The Director is obviously old school management and with no team building skills or for that matter, basic manager skills or people skills. Me, I would be looking for another company to explore my career with. A company that values me and my contribution to the overall success of the company. Being worried about being "black balled" is another sign that it is not a trusting organization. Before you stress youself out for people who do not care about you, leave and find a healthy organizaion who appreciates your talents and dedication.

It appears to me that someone in a higher position has gotten pissed off over something trival. They're just looking for anything to get you out of there. Don't burn any bridges, try to get a good job reference, and by all means......start looking for another job. I recommend a book called "The Bully Buster" lots of good stuff on how to overcome this delima.

I was streamlined to a QA position in a similar situation last year. As the salary remained the same I didn't worry about it, losing most of the headache involved with supervision was a treat. If you feel threatened keep other options open or check with HR to see what can be found out confidentially but I would not dig too deep.

Much the same thing happened to me, replaced in-line when a new group was imported into management and didn't apparently care for my IS management style after I had plied it there for 12 or 13 years. Given just as little explanation, like you.

Once the new manager was in place over me, I performed my now-purely technical duties to the best of my ability and effort. I didn't take time to sabotage the new guy's efforts of withhold assistance - no reason to assasinate him, he was just trying to find a job. I held my head high and continued to offer the best IT advice I could in light of my extensive knowledge of their business. I slept well at night.

Of course, all the time I also looked for my next post and found it about a year later, with a larger staff in a more technically progressive environment (i.e they have resources to exert in IT, compared to my years of getting by with nothing in my prior post). I left on the best of terms and am still able to offer them (two + years later) some technical nuggets in an independent manner.

So my advice is to just take the high road. Give the place an honest day's work, don't burn any bridges all while you look for the next stop in your IT career. You'll sleep well at night, might even outlast the folks who replaced you and, if you get lucky like I did, might find yourself in a better place than you would ever have dreamed of applying for. Best of luck.

After six years of dedicated service, if tis is the best this "firm" can do, then MOVE ON. Something is very, very wrong in a situation that hires new and promotes over the old and experienced. Either you were somehow ineffecient and/or were not preforming as per their expectations.Or something else to which you have no lnowledge was "Really "going on. If this is the case, you have a right to be informed. As for this "You still have a Job" nonsense, this is their way of telling you to either accept the crumbs or go. I definitely would go. By staying you have shown that you are willing to be a floormat, losing even more respect in their eyes. Surely a man with your experience can get himself setup in a better position than the one you're puting up with right now. All the good manners and proper spelling in the world aren't going to help you if the Boss has decided that you are expendable, as is so evident in your case. They've insulted you on purpose, hoping you would go. If it were me, I would demand a full explanation, and at the same time be looking for another job. Then I would require an affidavit stating the amount of time that I worked at this"Firm" and the steps taken by me, to get where I was. I would then, make sure that the reasons I give for leaving "Are My Own", not because you were forced out of your position as this could damage your integrity with any possible future Boss. Either way, in this firm, it's a No Win situation for you and I would move on as fast as possible.
They don't deserve you and someone else just might appreciate you a little more and act in accordance with your talent and dedication. You'll never know,unless you try. But whatever you do, get out fast.
Good Luck.
AaB

Dear member,

This is just a new challenge for a probably better prospect. Change can be difficult at times like yours, but you must brace up to it. If you get discouraged, you might snowball into a non performance, which could affect your future appraisals.

It is possible that your new boss have seen your past performances and needed someone of such decorum to manage this position, little wonder he posted you there.

You are expected to maintain the excellent performance in your new position, after all, you were not born into helpdesk job.

If you take up this challenge seriously, you will simply continue to excel and become the envy of your peers.

I expect to hear from you on the outcome of this game.

Cheer up guy, and stay on top.

Regards,

Laz.

Since my original post last year, I have read all of your replies. Each one has given me much food for thought into my dilemma (spelled correctly this time).

I am still with the same company, and still in QA. I have basically took this situation and weighed the good and bad. My decision to stay was based on two main points.

1. Building a knowledge of an area that I had no previous experience.

2. I have 3 weeks of vacation and I am fully vested with the company.

I worked too long and hard to just throw all that away. I am enjoying the QA environment and recently put in for an open manager's position in QA.

The director that moved me, is no longer with the company. My new director, knows me and my history with the company since my first day. I feel this will have a positive outcome.

I am happy and enjoying this new QA knowledge and challenge.