4 replies
by darthkim
Well, we have used both here, and i have to give the nod to the hardware. We have tried both and the configuration for the nortel contivity was alot easier than the win2k box. Sure the win2k box is more cheaper, but remember, even the mid range vpn solution runs on a pII 400. (1000 concurrent connections) that is how streamlined the OS is.
But if you feel confident setting up the MSVPN solution and you have ISA running to relatively protect you from most hacking, i say go for it
by joshttny
I'm am currently working on an implementation plan for a VPN between three location. In doing some experiments I had some major problems with the Windows 2000 server VPN solution. Perhaps it's something I'm doing wrong, but I've already decided that I am staying away from the microsoft solution. I'm going to opt for a seperate VPN box. Don't know which one yet, looking into symantec and couple of others. I'll keep you updated on my progress.
Josh
Hi there Josh,
Any luck with your VPN? Please share...Thanks!
James
Hi there Josh,
Any luck with your VPN? Please share...Thanks!
James
This discussion is closed to new replies.
Trending IT Employment posts
Sort by Trending