Discussion Locked

Microsoft VPN vs Hardware VPN

0 helpful
4 replies
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.
This is tough, I guess I need those who had gone through both to tell me. Which one is better; in funtionality, flexibility, interoperability and cost justified. Please assist me if you have the slightest idea. Thank you!

4 replies

by darthkim

Well, we have used both here, and i have to give the nod to the hardware. We have tried both and the configuration for the nortel contivity was alot easier than the win2k box. Sure the win2k box is more cheaper, but remember, even the mid range vpn solution runs on a pII 400. (1000 concurrent connections) that is how streamlined the OS is.

But if you feel confident setting up the MSVPN solution and you have ISA running to relatively protect you from most hacking, i say go for it

by joshttny

I'm am currently working on an implementation plan for a VPN between three location. In doing some experiments I had some major problems with the Windows 2000 server VPN solution. Perhaps it's something I'm doing wrong, but I've already decided that I am staying away from the microsoft solution. I'm going to opt for a seperate VPN box. Don't know which one yet, looking into symantec and couple of others. I'll keep you updated on my progress.

Josh

This discussion is closed to new replies.