Discussion Locked

Why isn't technical support working?

0 helpful
18 replies
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

Do you agree with Jonathan Yarden that IT professionals need to make more of an effort to work together? Do you think working together can help better secure systems? Share your comments about why technical support isn't working, as discussed in the Aug. 23 Internet Security Focus e-newsletter.

If you haven't subscribed to our free Internet Security Focus e-newsletter, sign up today! Click this link to subscribe automatically:
http://nl.com.com/MiniFormHandler?brand=techrepublic&list_id=e044

18 replies

by markflaherty

I agree with Jonathan. There needs to be more co-ordination within the IT community to address the security issues we must all manage.

I work for a large service provider (outsourcer) and it is becoming increasingly difficult to put a stake in the ground as to how well a network is protected.

There are a number of other issues that need to be considered as well - the major one in my opinion is that of simplicity and flexibility. With icreasing attempts to simplify often complex tasks, decisions on what is legitimate and what is not gets diluted. The flexibility to work from anywhere at anytime also means that certain risks have to be made.

To refer back to Jonathans ideas on co-operation, there needs to be some practicalway of co-ordinating or collecting information. This would need to be somewhat simple in the method as with the increasing difficulty of support, decreasing real budgets, there is not a lot of time left for "other activities" outside of the immediate problems.

The end users attitude os often "just fix it" but that is sometimes easier said than done when they are not directly paying for it.

A co-ordinated effort towards education and awareness may be the key to success. With the "many" sources of information in this area it becomes difficult just to keep up, let alone make inroads into tackling the issues properly.

I would certainly be interested in peoples ideas and suggestions.

by rogbirk

1) sometimes a carefully crafted question can draw the interest of the person in the ISP you are trying to contact. Need to be carefull here you can turn peolpe off just as easy.
2) I was able to contact an ISP in South Africa not using their help line but going to their website and leaving a comment! The good folks there responded.

by shanmac74

I work for the Call Center that serves Bellsouth and their Dial Internet customers. The major problem is that the turn over rate for Call Centers is extremely high. They lure you in with promises of bonuses and performance perks then work you to death for $6.50/hr. Dealing with the public on a daily basis, from people that have just signed up and just need a dialer config to someone else's 3 days of ongoing log, no surf is frustrating, not only to the customer but also on those of us that inherit the problem AKA troubleshooting call. My whole feeling is at this point I would never work in another Call Center again, it really bites!

by answerman

And without starting a raging debate here, keeping in mind the central topic, I would cite one thing as the reason that "help desking" is failing in nearly every industry. not just IT. I have seen it in hospitals, phone companies, financial institutions, vacuum cleaners, etc...

And that is...... OUTSOURCING.

It's time to demand that these companies that want to do business here in the USA; especially handling our money or finances, DO BUSINESS HERE. Quit outsourcing our customer service and helpdesks to Ubiziquistan or whatever other third-world hole you picked to save a buck.

If the increasing frequency and repetition of advertising on cable TV is any indication, we are numb, dumb, and apathetic all at the same time.

I personally don't care if the person helping me when I have a technical issue is green, purple, brown, gray, red, or orange..... but all I ask is.... TRY TO SPEAK MY LANGUAGE.... OKAY?

Until someone in politics has the "stones" to say, "quit outsourcing your helpdesks, tech support, and customer service"...it will not change... (where is FDR when you need him?)

If what your saying is your such poor managers, that you cannot control your costs well enough, to hire people to take carre of the people that made you all your money? How ridiculous does that sound?

Isn't it curious that if outsourcing or not outsourcing these vital services, is THE make or break issue of that company, then they have no business being in business anyway.

No one is going to be ABLE to work together with anyone, if they are spread out to 177 different countries all trying to save a one-hundreth of one cent per incident ticket.

Just my 3-1/2 cents.

by dwigman

Dude, like I wouldn't mind too much if you ante'd up 7 cents! I think your opinions are shared by a larger, but SILENT, majority and since no position is immune from the hatchet these days it'll probably remain SILENT *tsk-tsk*...

Anyway, the whole freaking INTERNET will have to come to a SCREECHING HALT before any real, positive steps will be taken - it will come no other way, trust me!!!

Good original topic Jonathan!
Great insight Answerman!!!

Thanks,

Despite the fight, the future's still bright!

by saphil9

then this particular gripe would not be as common. It seems like companies, at least the ones I have worked for, consider tech support a cost center that will somehow "go away" sometime in the near future, when all their clients understand the software or whatever. Tech support, and customer service personnel are the front line of you company, and if company leadership really understood that, then they would never set up customer contact to be so difficult. I worked for InfoAve for a while (small ISP that is owned by a coop of small phone companiey) and was worked to death for one buck over minimum wage. We were cynical to the point of death, and lasting over a month was a real milestone. We didn't need a ceiling fan because of the wind from the revolving door as people came in and went out. InfoAve thought their front line was the sales people at the telephone companies who talked to the customers for 5 minutes to set up the internet account. These people were important, but we were the people who talked to the customers when they were vulnerable, pissed off and confused. We really needed to be trained in how to handle the stress, and were not. Companies who hire the non-english-speakers are not just off-shore.. lots of new immigrants are happy to be working for $1.00 above minimum wage here, that's $3 more than they would be making in a restaurant.

by wjstroup

Interesting commments so far: a Call Center rep who is already disgruntled (welcome to the IT nursery,) train the users, blame fixing on foreign support centers that don't speak english as a native language....

Mr. Yarden is correct in his assessment of IT support within the US, however there are other countries that have been built on the philosophy of "Fix the problem, not the blame," a philosophy that hasn't quite caught on in our borders just yet.

We will be able to give a unified IT support to the end users when we are no longer concerned with who causes the problem, and are empowered to fix the problem, regardless of where it originates. The solution will be more in the lines of standardization than cooperation.

This will not, however, correct problems with users who don't know their right mouse button from their scroll wheel.

by peterpan1200

I shall agree that the philosphy is to fix the problem and not the blame. I have been working in a call center and this has always been the primary goal, "Help the user with quality service". But, many a times, we have found the service, breaks down when the user needs it the most. We should concentrate on an effective communication system between the varous vehicles of IT service deliveries. An effctive feild service group (Unicenter) with a transperent system, where by the user is able to view the progress of his request

by genell

I agree with Jonathan, tech support support standards would be really helpful. Not only for better communications between ISPs, but for a guideline in what priorities need to be on an ISP network. I run an ISP serving primarily dialup customers, 1500, the majority of whom are newer to intermediate user levels. We support them through computer education classes, informative e-mails and diagnosis of their systems infection with viruses, spyware and ddos attacks. Our support is provided through walk in questions from customers, over the phone and in extreme cases of infection, we have them bring their computers in and we clean them free because it actually saves us money and headache in the long run.

Its hard to keep up with all the maintenance that new technologies and associated preditors require on the network. I'd be interested in participating with any test groups Jonathan might create as part of a study and will follow this topic. Feel free to e-mail me.
Regards,
Genell Grow
Technology & Education Director
Columbia Learning Center, St. Helens, Oregon

by saphil9

It would be great to have standards and _be empowered_ to fix what needs fixing.

Count me in too!
Wolf Halton
Halton Digital Defense, Smyrna GA

P.S. Y'all might want to re-read "Life on the Mississippi" especially the parts about forming the steamboat pilot's union.

by keefebella

Lets face it. Unless the majority of ISP's band together to stamp out these issues, no action will be taken. No one company can take responsibility for this problem, as the costs would be prohibitive, to be polite. Why can there be an Association of Automakers and not an Association of Internet Service Providers to set continent or even worldwide standars that all must adhere to?

by wljennings

This is one of the most thoughtful discussions I have seen on this forum. But! It aint good nuf. The earlier reference to FDR is nearly there, nearly there. FDR moved the hearts and minds of the American people, when that was when that was all they had to left, and thats what needs to change. The ISPs are not going to do it they are in the same trap everyone else is. It's time to break to G.. D... trap, and, yes, a new FDR AND an American people re-commited to the general welfare. If we can do that all these other problems will just be more fun in solving. The new FDR is out there, he is just very old for that responcability. Good work guys, keep the faith, keep going.

by eschlangen

You partially answered your own questions when you talked about low budgets for support. Both my staff and I are working long hours to take care of the problems that are reported to us, both the legitimate and those that are caused by user lack-of-understanding. There are times when I get calls and I'm sure the person on the other end thinks that I am, to quote from the article, "arrogant". I'm NOT arrogant, I'm TIRED!

by jcitizen

Itis good to see a topic that hits home! Fortunately the ISP's in my area are very cooperative, although understaffed and/or under experienced.(of course)

Quite frankly our worst problem is California, which is where most of the scanning comes from. Too bad you can't block a state from the net - my problems would be solved! Maybe with IP v6?

Write your Congressman!

by alethea

I agree with Mr. Yarden. There is nothing better than working together as a team to accomplish a common goal.

Whether you work for an ISP or a small or large business, if you are an IT pro then you should be able to work together to stamp out problems.

Who has the time to get it started? It's a great opportunity for someone to start up an organization where IT professionals can directly contact each other.

by r.spruit

First i like to excuse me for my poor english, as i am a native Dutchman.

I was not allways a IT man. It more or less grown on me and finally i took the step and became an IT professional.
In my whole carreer i noticed and enjoyed international working with national en international fellow job en equally skilled coworkers in healthcare and research.
International organisation coordinates this and stimulate data en knowledge exchange.
But not so in IT, Every bit of knowledge is costly and expencive, needs to be taken by courses or time consuming meetings and such.
While whe, as IT professionals, have the tool "pur sang" to exchange knowledge and establish the best of the best global wide, whe hide in bastions of poor profit, competition en self interest.
These bastions are the subject of the war against that what the idea of internet represent.
The It world became an in it self turned, paranoid scared developers paradise, in wich we dear not turn to each other to move forward.
Look at Windows, 280 mb update on a install size of poorly 300 mb original cd content and 3 weeks later allready two very needed security updates to close the gaps.
Not so in the powerful and steady growing open source OS Linux. And this is beceause it is not a bastion, and therefore it is not attacked as such.
Whe live in one world with no internet boundery's.
I would say, Open up, don't be afraid and join knowledge, effords and energy and move forward.
IF there is a serious centra meetingpoint on where all is discussed without beeing affraid of loosing one or two customers, the whole IT world wil dow well.
So , yes make a kind of UN for IT and get things done.
Ren? Spruit

by bbaltas

I'd like to agree with you, but I believe your solution is far too simple.

In my humble opinion, the problem of technical support not working has four parts that need to be "fixed." First, the end user is not trained, and simply does not understand relatively simple procedures (simple from an IT standpoint). More advanced users, such as programmers, are even worse because they don't believe that their system is causing the problem that they are calling about.

Second, first line help desk staff are understaffed and not properly trained, and by the time they get the training they move on. I cannot tell you the number of times I've received a ticket from our front line staff that simply says "the Internet is slow." I don't have a customer name location or other symptoms. I'm sorry I probably cannot fix a problem like this - there simply is not enough information.

Third, communication within many organizations can be as bad as communiations between ISPs and customers. I had a problem with another ISP a few months ago. I called the support departement of the ISP right at a shift change, and the day shift had no idea of a problem that graveyard had been working on. In this case I was fortunate that in a past life I worked with a vice president of this ISP and made a call that received immediate attention.

Forth, management that I've worked for often does not understand the complexity of the modern IT environment. As large as Microsoft and Cisco are, this is not a one Operating System/ one Infrastructure Internet. I work for an organization that has mainframes, various flavors of Unix, Windows, AS400's etc. Applications are written in JAVA, C, .NET and others. This is alot to understand and put together, and most managers cannot find the time to digest all of this.

All of the above and more needs to be addressed before technical support can gain the reputation and respect that it deserves.

by rjsmithmcps

The Internet has become the major battleground for businesses and ISPs. Increasing profits while cutting labor costs has become the prime objective. Tech support calls are now being submitted to automated systems that don't work right half the time.

Legislation was enacted to attempt to address one of the biggest technical support issues at hand. SPAM/UCE and end user privacy. It's not working because businesses and ISPs are actually capitalizing off the daily proliferations of viruses, worms, trojans and the like. What the heck... don't expect these guys to cut themselves out of this kind of action any time soon without another act of Congress intervening in some way or form.

It's managers who are afraid of IT, or don't understand or support IT initiatives are the biggest reasons for the lack of technical support. These managers have allowed for excessive budget cuts to be made in IT departments for systems, manpower and training. As a result, there are not enough technicians available to handle the increasing workloads, and existing IT staffers are not getting the quality of training that they need in order for them to continue doing their jobs effectively.

This discussion is closed to new replies.