7 replies
by thechas
If you are referring to a built in defrag tool from Microsoft, not really.
Diskeeper from Executive software, or Norton Speed Disk do a much better job of "optimization".
I don't know if Norton is W2K compatible prior to version 2002.
Chas
by sfowler
by dklippert
by sfowler
by b_pope
I've used Norton's & ended up going back to Windows defrag. If you download lots of files & such, Norton takes forever & I never really found that it helped speed anything up.
I defrag everyday now & it takes less than 10 minutes. You also need to get rid of temp files & cookies regularly.
Unless you use the exact same programs everyday, no defrager will ever optimize your system anyway.
by sfowler
by thechas
Microsoft's built in tool pretty much does just a simple defrag.
It does little if any file location optimization.
Norton's tool is reported to do a decent job at Optimization.
Disk-keeper is also reported to do a decent job of optimization, and may be better suited to a W2K system than Norton.
The important consideration for overall system performance in my mind is to reduce / prevent fragmentation of the swap / page file.
Windows tool does NOT do this, unless you move / disable theswap file on the drive being defragmented.
Norton's tool can be configured to place a fixed size swap file on the fastest section of the hard drive. (at least for W9X)
I believe that Disk-keeper can also be configured to "optimize" the swap file.
Check out this link for a comparison of Diskeeper to the W2K defrag utility,
http://www.execsoft.com/diskeeper/dk-comparison.asp
Of course, they are trying to sell the product. They also have a white paper and trial version that you can download.
Hope this makes things clearer.
Chas
This discussion is closed to new replies.
Trending Windows Forum posts
Sort by Trending