5 replies
by whoops Accepted solution
by langlier Accepted solution
by choppit Accepted solution
Virtualisation is likely the closest you'll get to achieving what you're looking for. If you intend to run a VM permanently on XP together I'd recommend you have at least 1GB of RAM and don't expect top notch graphics performance from the VM. Try VMWare Server
http://www.vmware.com
by whoops Accepted solution
well, the KVM is a good idea, but i don't have the money to buy another PC, and i wouldn't be able to share stuff from each HD, unless i went through the network, which causes other problems, since i would have to share my hard drives.
the other idea is a virtual route, which i have tried some before, but i find it difficult to share data still, and had hoped i could avoid virtual machines if possible. do you know the specifics of why it is not possible to boot two OSes at the same time? like what it is about its requirements that don't allow it?
by choppit Accepted solution
If both OSes were running on the same physical hardware (i.e not virtually) how would either be able to manage resource usage (CPU, memory, I/O) without knowing what the other was doing?
What's the problem with using network shares? If performance is a major consideration for you then you need to provide a second set of hardware.
This discussion is closed to new replies.
Trending Linux posts
Sort by Trending