Discussion Locked

Files downloading: ftp vs http

0 helpful
4 replies
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

Can anyone explain when should a company enable ftp services? what are the pros and cons? or things to take note?

The situation is, that some of my users are trying to download files that are nearly 60mb over 56kbps via a http (web application)!! And there's no way we can improve the internet speed...

Is ftp a solution?

4 replies

by stress junkie

When should a company use FTP? You can use FTP in a secure intranet, or over a VPN, or when you want to distribute files to the public.

FTP pros:
- can be tied to specific user accounts and require user authentication
- can allow anonymous access if desired

FTP cons:
- easy target for hackers

HTTP pros and cons are the same as for FTP. HTTP may be less secure than FTP depending on which software you use for your HTTP server and which platform on which you are running the HTTP server and how you configure it.

=====

Network speed:

FTP vs. HTTP will not make any difference for downloading large files over dial up lines. The arithmetic of the situation describes your problem.

56Kbps ~ 5.6KB/second ( 56 thousand bits per second is approximately equivalent to 5.6 thousand bytes per second).

1 million = 1 thousand times 1 thousand

So 5.6KB/second will require 1 thousand seconds to download 5.6 million bytes.

It will also require 10 thousand seconds to download 56 million bytes.

Even if you get 115kbps that is still at least 5 thousand seconds to download 56 million bytes.

My calculator says that 5 thousand seconds can also be expressed as 83.3 minutes.

We know that 83 minutes can be expressed as 1 hour and 23 minutes.

This is the best performance that you can hope for. A lot of factors can make the process take longer. When I was using dial up it would typically take me 20 minutes to download 1 million bytes.

=====

What you might try to do is to compress the file at the source. Unfortunately the time that you gain transmitting fewer bytes might be lost due to less modem hardware compression.

As far as I can see you are stuck with downloads taking about an hour and a half or longer unless you upgrade your network hardware to some type of broadband.

Sorry.

by jaqui

what justify?
dialup is slow, which is the strong selling point for broadband in any form.
much faster.

modem speeds have not improved in 5 years.
broadband started at 3 times the fastest modem, and has since gotten to the 10 mb/s speed.

a lot of the companies that are making downloads available have times for download, with 56k being longest time and t1 or better being the fastest.

even windows update, when downloading something like a service pack, will give you a listing of download times for the different connections.

if a 5 to 10 megabyte file is going to take longer than a few minutes, I find a different source.

with broadband connection, I'll download 3 700 MB iso files in 4 hours.
no download accelerators, or download manager.

a comparison example for the dialup over broadband:
your driving a lamborghini.
how fast will you take it on a pothole filled 2 lane gravel road? ( dialup )
how fast on a 4 lane either direction interstate? ( broadband )

the modem for the dialup is the 2 lane gravel raod.
a choke point.

by ni70

such as Download Accelerator Plus. I'm sure there are others out there. I've used DAP in the past and it works well.

This discussion is closed to new replies.