Discussion Locked

Is Microsoft SMS v.2.0 really domain ind

0 helpful
2 replies
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

Our goal is to get software and hardware inventory on our 100 PCs.

In the "Is Microsoft's SMS v.2.0 worth the wait? " article, a note says that "SMS v.2.0 is not dependent on a Microsoft domain".

Related documentation from Microsoft Press saysexplicitly that "A stand-alone Windows NT/2000 Server cannot run SMS, since it is not registered in a domain. Domain membership is necessary ...".

For some reasons we don't want a domain.

Can somebody help me?

thanks

2 replies

by jewright

SMS requires either an NT domain or a Netware server to authenticate users(it does not need NDS).

SMS will NOT work in a workgroup setting.

You will need a Domain to use SMS 2.0. I remember reading that this is posible with a Linux-Samba approach but I don't think it would be worth it.

There are much easier ways to run an inventory on 100 machines if that is all you need to do. Sneaker-net once or twice a year for instance.

Thanks.....Jeremy Wright (I am the only person I know certified in SMS 2.0 and I still think it sucks)

This discussion is closed to new replies.