Discussion Locked

PC -> MAC... Worth it?

0 helpful
15 replies
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

I've been considering moving from my PC to a MAC for some time now (because Vista isnt an option) and wanted to go ahead and put together a pros/cons list of MAC with the tech republic community. BTW i know this horse has been beaten into a fine mist, but i wanna pot my pov anyway.

PROS:
less malware
better hardware
smooth interface
better cmd tools
faster for harware
unix!
good community support
can run bootcamp
looks hawt!

CONS:
Less software
small hardware list
mem hungry interface
less GUI tools
more money
not windows UI
bad mfg support
must run bootcamp...
uhm who cares about looks?

Im also thinking i want to be able to teach my kid(wife's preggers woot!) both, and by the time hes old enough to learn both it'll be old enough that he can mess it up and i wont care. But in the end is it just a prettier more expensive box to do the same thing i am already doing on XP. but again this is for when xp finally dies off as MS is trying so hard to make happen. Thats all i can think of ATM but i know tech rep. will give me a more complete list.

15 replies

by forum surfer

This will undoubtedly be another flame war! It's all in your preference IMO. If you want a Mac get a Mac. If you want a PC get one and run what you want...*nix or m$. They all have very different personalities. I don't like going out and buying a generic box, so I don't buy Apple or any name brand pc. I prefer to build my own, so I have a new gaming rig that's running Vista (and it allows me to more easily remote admin my stuff at work) and my older pc's get demoted to file/media servers running different flavors of *nix or sold off. Since I like to build my own, Mac is out of the question because the only way to run leopard is through an illegal hack.

IMO I haven't seen either side demonstrate superior hardware when you compare apples to apples...excuse the pun. Macs are initially more expensive up front, and for the same price you can typically build a pc with far better components for far less money...even if you pay a shop to build it.

All in all, if you are considering a Mac and spending that much money to avoid maintenance is worth it to you personally or if you just prefer their OS/apps...then be my guest and buy a Mac.

I don't like how Mac locks you into their hardware, I don't like how M$ locks you into their software and I hate getting flamed on a *nix support forum if I mention owning Windows or preferring it in certain apps...so I personally just use whatever gets the job done more easily for me. 9/10 times that's a pc running Windows of some flavor...so that's what I buy.

As for Xp dying off, I'd bet they'll continue to be updates and support from m$ through at least 2009 or 2010. I'd just get a pc with Xp, 4 gigs of ram (even though you can't use it all at 32 bit..we all know Xp64 is an effort in futility) a decent graphics card (NVidia 8xxx series) and a 2.66 core2duo or any of the quad cores/core2extreme. That way you'll run Xp at blazing speeds and still be able to upgrade to Vista at blazing speeds after the 1st service pack comes out if you wish.

IMO I haven't seen either side demonstrate superior hardware when you compare apples to apples...excuse the pun. Macs are initially more expensive up front, and for the same price you can typically build a pc with far better components for far less money...even if you pay a shop to build it.

All in all, if you are considering a Mac and spending that much money to avoid maintenance is worth it to you personally or if you just prefer their OS/apps...then be my guest and buy a Mac.

I don't like how Mac locks you into their hardware, I don't like how M$ locks you into their software and I hate getting flamed on a *nix support forum if I mention owning Windows or preferring it in certain apps...so I personally just use whatever gets the job done more easily for me. 9/10 times that's a pc running Windows of some flavor...so that's what I buy.

As for Xp dying off, I'd bet they'll continue to be updates and support from m$ through at least 2009 or 2010. I'd just get a pc with Xp, 4 gigs of ram (even though you can't use it all at 32 bit..we all know Xp64 is an effort in futility) a decent graphics card (nVidia 8xxx series) and a 2.66 core2duo or any of the quad qores/core2extreme. That way you'll run Xp at blazing speeds and still be able to upgrade to Vista at blazing speeds after the 1st service pack comes out if you wish.

by tig2

I made the switch a couple of months ago. What I am finding is that I can find all the software I want or need fairly easily. Licensing for MS Office for the Mac (2008 version expected out soon) is significantly less expensive, I'm running Leopard without a hitch, the preloaded software is stuff I actually get use of, and it was connected to my wireless within a couple of minutes. In fact, from the first press of the power button to full set up was about 28 minutes (I did it during a TR outage).

Watch for a new blog on the process. The first entry is here: http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/helpdesk/?p=149

The follow ups will focus on making the transition.

Something to consider- Parallels will allow you to put XP or Vista into a virtual machine that then sits on the dock. An easy way to keep a Windows install handy without dual booting.

The bottom line is that you choose the right tool for you. When I considered this purchase, the conclusion that I came to was that Mac was the right tool for what I wanted to do.

Good luck!

by demosthanese

two genuinly helpful responses in what is surely a flamewar in the making. You two are both right in that i have to choose what gets the job done, but as a reponse:

I typically build my own systems, but i am getting a laptop most likely. As for the hackintosh i already have one of those. It lets me get used to some features but some just plain will not work. like the my second core and wireless networking.

since prices are coming down a bit on the quad cores i might go that route for home and demote my laptop (duo core 2.4 2gig) to the wife.

as a question to tiger: what if anything do you notice about parallels in terms of speed? is it clean enough for my 3d apps (maya 8, houdini) vector (corel x3) and games (WoW, BF2, etc). maya i think will work on mac nativly, corel i know wont.

by tig2

Is give it a shot. I don't use 3D apps so have no direct experience for you. There are a few here who may be able to answer that for you, however.

If it is a concern, I would go down the Boot Camp path. And I recall seeing something about WoW being enabled on a MacBook. If I can find it, I'll post it.

I don't see the discussion as a reason for a flame war. Everyone will have a favorite but I don't see that there is a clear front runner for ALL. We all have different desires from our computing environment.

by neon samurai

If you want a build your own then your looking at desktop chassis but if you've already decided on a laptop then you may want to compare between a Lenovo Thinkpad and a Macbook Pro. They seem pretty "apples to apples" in terms of hardware quality. In my case, I'd be interested in a toughbook, thinkpad then macbook in that order but that's for my own needs.

For anyone else I'm talking too.. I recommend a laptop unless there is a reason they need a desktop case. In terms of laptops I recommend one of the three I mentioned above first before other brands depending on needs.

I'm curious about parillels also. As I understand, like the rest of the desktop virtualization world, does not support 3D graphics yet so while Word will run great, Maya is going to have to be a dual boot or native osX version. I don't know how much of a performance hit you'd feel with the Parillels layer inbetween the Apple hardware and installed VM.

by jamesrl

Maya has a Mac version. I sold a few Macs to Alias a couple of decades ago.

In general the Mac platform has been in the background of building games for a long time, even if the commericial versions were only released on the PC. Halo's predecessor was Marathon, a title that was developed on the Mac and ported to PC.

There are games for the Mac, just not all the titles. BF2 doesn't exist, but its followon Battlefield 2142 is available. WoW is out there, Quake etc.

James

by forum surfer

Intel will be releasing some new products within the next few months, as well as AMD. So maybe it's time to wait yet again. Once the new line is released you can pick up some high end core2duos or quads on the cheap. But if you're like me waiting is hard to do once you have the $ burning a hole in your pocket.

Lately I've found with all this confusion in the pc/Mac world people like to buy whatever I have at home that works, lol. So about every 9 months I build a new pc and end up selling it off to a friend. I can sell it for what I originally paid for all the parts through Newegg then upgrade slightly since prices drop so fast. It's getting out of control now, lol. I'm selling off my current combo (680i, two 8800's in SLI, 2.66 core2duo, 4 gigs ddr2 1000, 2 raptors and on wd 500 gig drive, a 19" LCD and decent keyboard/mouse) for about $1500 to a friend who runs a business. He wants something for gaming/multimedia at home and just doesn't have time to order/build everything to his liking. Through various selling/trading/bartering I've got maybe $1000 in the system. Now NVidia released this 780i chipset and I'm thinking of buying that so I can have 3 8800's in SLI. My point is IF I bought a Mac it's the end of all the selling/trading/bartering of parts that I enjoy doing. I actually like tearing apart my system and wiring it professionally so it looks cool...even if there's no window.

I'm kind of going on and on about nothing since you want a laptop, though. I had one with Windows Xp on it and it was awesome...I sold it once someone offered me cash for it though. People in a hurry buy whatever they get their hands on. If I were in the market though, the new Asus high end 15.4" gaming laptops make me drool. They are excellent all around performers and look awesome without screaming "I'm a geek!" Get one, slap in a 7200RPM drive (if not equipped) and reload Windows and you have one nice rig.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834220256

If you want no frills/professional there is no other choice outside of a Mac book or a ThinkPad.

Whatever makes you happy, it's your $$.

by mbm29414

I'm not sure I can agree with that. Maybe on the "no frills" part, but as far as working in a professional environment, there are a lot of other choices. The brand my company (at my suggestion) has continually gone with is Dell. I have had several Latitudes (which have subsequently been "passed down") and now am running a Precision M90. This is the best business system I've ever worked on. Also, it's VERY powerful (Core 2 Duo @ 2.0 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HDD), with a 17" screen (1920x1200) and only cost about $2500. It's a beast and didn't come with a bunch of junk software pre-loaded.

We're also getting perfectly fine results out of an HP consumer laptop for one of our HR workers, and have previously gotten 3 good years of service from an eMachines.

Just letting people know to shop around and not say "It's gotta be IBM or Apple." Get the right tool for the job.

by avcheu

I work in a shop with both and work in both OS's constantly. I need to use both. Which do I like? The one that works fastest! I can't stand a slow, old iMac or an old PC so it doesn't matter...

Art files, etc. is the predominant work for the Mac; number crunching, Word docs and basic HTML code is for the PC.

eMail and browsing is the same for both. Webcamming is the same.

The only issues I've found of interest is with photo applications. How do I want to work on my digital photos and save them? I like Mac's iPhoto better though not perfect. A friend just went pc->Mac and she hates it but has never worked on a Mac before and is still in a PC mindset. I think one has to be ready to change or be flexible.

Fonts are a problem on the Macs as it can be located in more than one place and if there is a confusion, it really isn't intuitive as to how Apple resolves it.

I will say that in the lifetime of a PC over a Mac - I've had more crashes and re-installs with Windows. Mac's 3-year extension service makes it really easy to drop it off and have it serviced - almost no questions asked. PC support makes you jump through loads of hoops before they seem to help. (Yes, I turned it off and restarted, yes, I unloaded all the startup programs, yes I started it in safe mode ... blah blah!)

I will continnue to use both and have both at home! It's weird but I'm comfortable in both but do have less overall downtime with Macs.

Hope that helps. (PS- I don't play games 'cept Hearts and the like so that may be a factor for you).

by fregeus

Simply in order to get off the Microsoft bandwagon, even for a little while. Ever since I learned that WOW was available on Mac, I haven't thought of anything else. A friend of mine bought a MAC recently on my recommendation and he is thrilled about it.

Like the others said, it all depends on what you want to do with it. I am past the 'build your own' phase and now i just want stuff out of the box that works the first time everytime.

My next box is a MAC for sure. Now if i could only decide between a laptop or desktop....

TCB

by neon samurai

It's mobile.
It's all in one clean little box.
IT's as upgradable as the Apple desktops.
You can buy an external monitor if you like.
You can plug in a mouse if you like.
You can plug in a keyboard if you like.

Even on the non-Apple side, I wouldn't recommend a desktop over a laptop these days unless there was a specific need. The only thing I could guess at in your case is weather the Apple laptop can push WOW graphics as well as a desktop.

by demosthanese

I work and play on the same box (well, laptop) so I HAVE to be able to run games and art apps. I know i can dual boot but what a pain is the arse to have to reboot if im going from zbrush and maya to messing around with games. Thats what i do now between my hackintosh (on toshiba laptop) and winXp. Seems like, atleast ATM windows is really my best option, which is a shame because tbh i effin loath m$.

but before i get into that are any of you familiar with wine? i messed with it back in my *nix days (omg i feel old), but never tried hard enough to get everything running. Has it come to the point of emulating w/o an extra layer like it was originally supposed to?

by tig2

I have only worked very marginally with these tools and I doubt that I have the same demands that you have.

On PCLinuxOS, they worked fine. Keep in mind, I don't do any gaming.

I would talk to some of the heavy-weights in their user forums. I found them helpful and informative.

by charliespencer

You don't say what you want to do with this computer. That should be the prime factor in your decision. Look for the software you want to run and buy the hardware and OS that support those apps.

If you're not going to do anything spectacular, consider upgrading the RAM, HD, and video in your existing box. It will cost less than a new system and you can still run XP.

by demosthanese

Could have sworn, and indeed reading back i did ask specifically about, 3D apps (primarily Maya, but also Houdini and 3dSM) and gaming (mostly WoW and BF2). I also mentioned that im on a laptop, so the whole upgrading parts doesnt really work that well. The HDD/mem are easy enough, but the video is built onto the board so no luck there.

Thanks for the tips though.

This discussion is closed to new replies.