9 replies
by baadil
It don't think it really is another step. Once you tell the client where the profile is, it start communicating at that path. Yes, if it is on PDC, it already has the name resolution so it just starts the communication, on the other hand if it is ona different machine, it will need to resolve the name first.
So, if your name resolution is setup properly, I do not see it being a big issue when it comes to performance. It might even be faster if the PDC is busy authenticating other clients instead of paying attention to your profile request.
HTH
by dgates_1
by data-dr
Not really. In fact, in larger domains, it's better to separate the two. If you have limited domain controllers on the network, then the PDC will be busy answering authentication requests, and it would lighten the load on it to not have to send profiles as well. Using a separate server for the profiles frees up the PDC to just answer auth and browse requests.
Be aware of this as well. If you are running SP5 on the terminal server, there is a bug that will hand the processor on the server. When users log off the terminal server, their profile will not unload properly and that session's CSRSS.EXE will hang the processor on the server (see Q234606). This was corrected in SP6, but SP6 has a problem with the ICA browser service (is youare using Citrix MetaFrame). This is fixed in Q269214. I hope this helps...
by dgates_1
by dc1
by dgates_1
by ntoz
by dgates_1
by dgates_1
This discussion is closed to new replies.
Trending Windows Forum posts
Sort by Trending