Discussion Locked

Tech Perspective: Cisco and Brocade

0 helpful
3 replies
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.
According to Gartner, network administrators have been concerned about making major investments in Cisco products due to the company's general silence on the subject of SANs. But a recent partnership between Cisco and Brocade to develop a Fibre Channel interface for Cisco's Catalyst 6000 family of switches to transport SAN traffic over IP-based networks could help. Do you trust Cisco as a "networking partner"? How do you feel now that Cisco is beginning to address SANs? What do you think of Cisco?s partnership with Brocade and its plans to push iSCSI? How do you think storage should be interconnected between and within enterprises? You can read the related Gartner article, which will be posted 3 A.M. Monday, at https://www.techrepublic.com/article.jhtml?id=r00220001127ggp01.htm.

3 replies

by Former member

By SANs I presume you mean some kind of off-site storage? Thanks for the acronym and the bad link. Neither of which helped me understand the question.

As far as SANs goes, it's not important enough for me or anyone I know to get excited about in this area of the country. I could care less if Cisco supported it or not. What is important is LAN/WAN performance, without this additional load that is only designed to get rid of more IT jobs. ANd Cisco-Powered networks are the most scalable, best performing networks in the world.

This discussion is closed to new replies.