Discussion Locked

Win2k DNS Server + Linux secondary DNS Server

0 helpful
19 replies
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

I have a Windows 2000 DC DNS Server (Active Directory Integrated). I need to setup a Secondary DNS Server running on Linux 9.0 in the same domain.

I am new to Linux, advise me on how do i go about.

19 replies

by lordinfidel

Since your last question stated that you could not use 2K server at all. These sound awfully like questions one would be asked in a networking class. (not that I have ever taken one, taught but not taken)

Also it's not linux 9.0. Your probably referring to RedHat 9.

Linux goes by kernel version IE RedHat 9 w/2.4.9 kernel.

If this is for school I will tell you what I tell everyone else. In IT you have got to learn how to think for yourself. Asking guy's like me how to do it serves you no meaningful purpose in learning.

by nebit

I feel that asking questions is a very large part of the learning process. We have all had mentors growing up and people who have taught us how to setup DNS ..etc learning information is the same if you read it out of a book or ask the guy next to you. I learn better having a friend explain to me why something works rather than reading documentation.

Thinking for yourself is knowing who to ask the right questions at the right time.

by lordinfidel

There is a difference between asking someone's input on solving a problem then asking someone how to do something because you can't teach yourself how to do it.

Having a friend explain something is not the same as reading it and comprehending the information on your own.

It is this critical skill that escapes most people today working in IT. It typically is this one skill that seperates those of us who exel and those who don't.

And it's not just true in IT. The person who does not have to rely on others for their answers will always be the one who exels at their job.

I choose to teach my subordinates how to problem solve so that they can find the answers on their own rather then look to me for the answers. I want them to be able to think for themselves without relying on others.

It's the whole teach a man how to fish theory with a twist, "The man teaches himself how to fish".

by kent2612

That is all i need, a guide to the right reading materials. As you know it is always toughest to get the ball rolling and out of no where.
Thank you...

Cheers!!!

by lordinfidel

Read the post and the point I was trying to get across.

Too many "Students" are using this forum to get people like me to do their homework for them. Instead of doing the work themselves.

I answered this gentlemans question about a different network on a different thread, and found it odd that he asked a totally different question about something else. Usually this pattern means the person is asking questions that he/she is supposed to solve on their own.

I'm all for helping people, but it comes at a price on the other end. The other person must be willing to work at finding the answer. Not just ask for the answer without even trying. You don't really learn that way.

You can claim that you can, and it may be possible to be taught by following step by step what others say, but you lose a critical foundation of self-thinking.

That is my point. No one spoon fed me information and I don't spoon feed my staff. And because of that, my staff can think on their own and solve problems that they would not be able to solve if I had just told them how to solve it.

by chriseh

Children, Children stop the back & forth it accomplishes nothing, doesn't do anybody any good, and is a waste of time. I found this squabbling most hilarious to say the least but, also to be rather childish.

A simple response of look at this link or that book would have been sufficient for the person. Surely this forum contains members who are at a professional maturity without having to get into this petty squabble. Most of us are here to learn not necessarily have it done for us but, to learn. I too ask questions not to have the answer given to me outright but, at least to be pointed in the direction where I will have the best chances of finding the answer's I seek.

by yong98

I don't think current samba release come with any "linux 9.0" (RedHat 9.0 or Mandrake 9.x) has Active Directry support. You may only setup a linux box as a PDC. Check the samba website for the detail.

by edlover

thanks for answering question and pointing in the right direction.It shows character

by chris..

But anyway... Yes you can use a BIND compliant DNS server to connect to and update a Win2k ADNS service. The trick is just making sure you have a Dynamic Update enabled version of BIND. If my memory serves me correctly I think BIND has been Dynamic compliant since 8.0 ???? it's right around that version.

Needless to say you should seek some assistance in building the Linux server, there are some catches to the security configurations just as in any OS and you don't want just anyone updating the DNS on either. Then again, why not just let the Linux server be a secondary DNS for the system. There is no harm in doing that other than you might need to manually update any UNIX/LINUX systems manually in the win2k DNS.

Several options here, if you could be more specific about your end goal and the base win2k config I'll be happy to add a bit more to this.

chris.floyd@fpanet.org

by jderieg

Even those with excellent problem solving skills like to get a little extra help sometimes. I'm glad I don't work for you. Especially when you refer to your co-workers as "subordinates". Isn't that a little condescending? You may have problem solving skills, but it sounds like you need to work on your people skills.

by lordinfidel

But i *am* their boss, so technically they are my subordinates.

I apologize if you don't like the term, but if it was good enough for the US Army to use while I was enlisted, it's good enough for me to use now in the private sector.

Help is different from spoon feeding. But I guess that concept is wasted on those that can't think for themselves to begin with.

My theory when helping my peers, "If your not willing to take the time to help yourself, why should I take the time to solve the problem for you".

by chris..

You've wasted your time, and most of ours with your flames.

I don't care what you call your direct reports, but if you remember what our momma's used to say.. "if you ain't got nothin nice to say then don't say nuthin" you might want to apply that now.

by lordinfidel

I did not grill anyone.....

But since I am accused by you,
Why don't you take your own advice and shut up.

by lordinfidel

Normally I will point the person in the right direction. It just so happens that when he asked multiple questions, we were having a rash of people enrolled in school asking the:

"If I have this scenario how do I, provide details". And all of the scenarios sounded like they came from a book.

Which is why I questioned this guy's intent for receiving an answer. For some reason everyone else seems to think I was grilling him or acting holier than thou.

I was just trying to drive the point home to him that hey, try to find the answer to the problem then ask us to point you in th right direction, not do the work for you first. Especially if he is in school and this was homework. That is just counter productive to the reasons to go to school.

And I had answered another question of his in detail in another thread. I just did not want to waste my time again if it was nothing more then just so someone can take credit for my answers, passing them off as their own.

by ben low

Hi Kenny,

I hope this reference will be helpful for you. Pick up the series of books about DNS as well as Windows AD from Co-Author Cricket Liu. Do a search from Google or National Library you should find what you want on DNS and BIND as well as DNS and Windows AD.

I hope it helps.

This discussion is closed to new replies.