Cyberattackers use artificial intelligence, so why not apply it as a defense? One expert explains why AI can take your cybersecurity to the next level of protection.

In any debate, there are always at least two sides. That reasoning also applies to whether or not it is a good idea to use artificial intelligence technology to try stemming the advantages of cybercriminals who are already using AI to improve their success ratio.
SEE: Google Chrome: Security and UI tips you need to know (TechRepublic Premium)
In an email exchange, I asked Ramprakash Ramamoorthy, director of research at ManageEngine, a division of Zoho Corporation, for his thoughts on the matter. Ramamoorthy is firmly on the affirmative side for using AI to fight cybercrime. He said, “The only way to combat cybercriminals using AI-enhanced attacks is to fight fire with fire and employ AI countermeasures.”
An obvious question is: Why add another expensive technology to a company’s cybersecurity platform, especially in a department that many upper management types consider to have a terrible return on investment? Ramamoorthy offered the following reasons:
Besides maintaining a good public image, Ramamoorthy said he believes AI can help an organization stay ahead of cyberattackers. We all know the pandemic world has democratized access to sensitive data. Confidential information is no longer restricted to private networks or corporate devices but can be accessed from anywhere on any device.
“This gives hackers multiple potential access points to access your confidential enterprise data illegally,” Ramamoorthy said. “Attackers use powerful techniques like AI to exploit unsuspecting end-users to gain access to privileged information by compromising said access points.”
SEE: Password breach: Why pop culture and passwords don’t mix (free PDF) (TechRepublic)
Another disadvantage is that traditional (non-AI) security approaches have always worked based on static thresholds. Attackers can game the system by flying under the radar of static thresholds.
With that in mind, Ramamoorthy then asked why organizations aren’t using the same technology to fight back? The time is ripe for upping the security and privacy protection game with the help of AI. Ramamoorthy offered several real-world cyberattack scenarios and how AI would assist cybercrime-fighters.
Ramamoorthy said he believes AI can ensure better security across the tech stack—from cloud deployments to endpoints accessing data. “Rule-based systems might not be able to catch security vulnerabilities across the stack and might need complex rules to be written and maintained over time,” Ramamoorthy said. “With AI, the thresholds are automatically set depending on the trend and seasonal patterns in the data.”
He continued, “At the cloud level, AI can limit access to privileged information and avoid various attacks like Distributed Denial of Services, zero-day exploits, etc.”
According to Ramamoorthy, it is important to ensure the selected AI solution envelopes in the entire stack. Also, SIEM products with AI-based UEBA (User and Entity Behavior Analysis) tools would help ensure the security of critical systems.
He also noted endpoint-protection products are starting to include AI-based features such as ransomware identification and malware mitigation.
Ramamoorthy suggested using AI in cybersecurity is an excellent way to avoid being the lowest-hanging fruit on the digital tree, as not many organizations are now employing AI cybersecurity solutions. That is not true with cybercriminals; they’re keen on AI and deploying more AI-enhanced cyberattack technology every day.
There is a reason Ramamoorthy used the examples he did. He explained why in his parting comments: “Embracing AI-based UEBA modules as part of an organization’s SIEM solution should be the first step, as it is a helpful way of monitoring users and entities, as well as identifying suspicious patterns early on.”