13 replies
by sgri
Certainly the vendors I'm aware of are all able to give show that their ERP software will run on SQL Server 2005; its not as though there are any major technology breaks between 2003 and 2005. By 'certification' do you mean something official from the vendor or from Microsoft? The following vendors I know have been testing pre-release versions of SQL Server 2005 for some time:
-Microsoft
-SAP
-Syspro
by paul7410
by sgri
by grephead
We are a JDE/iseries shop. Oracle Fusion is the future for us if we upgrade. We already have MS SQL Server skills, etc.
I'm curious - has anyone migrated from AS400 to an MS "ERP" and lived to tell about it?
by bergy
This is from a total novice in the field of what Microsoft is doing in the horizontal application space but why are they adding confusion to the marketplace with four products? Do they plan on merging them into one or two products in the future?
Thanks in advance for any insight.
by sgri
Are you an OneWorld customer? In the 'old' days I saw companies migrate from JDE OW on DB2/iSeries to JDE OW on MS SQL - co-existence as it was called. They tried to make it easy but it was still a migration; it is still a serious project with business-critical implications.
IMO you should look at your current skills (MS SQL), see what the issues and costs are to change those skills (to Oracle), look at the business and systems changes for Oracle and for the MS products (also SAP Business One or All-in-One). At the moment there is such strong competition between MS, Oracle and SAP, you could get a good price.
by sgri
They bought a US ERP company - Great Plains - and got GP and Solomon, and a European ERP company - Navision Damgaard - and got Navision and Axapta. Just like the operating system, Office suite, and the server products, MS builds its business on platforms. ERP is a platform, this time for business.
They will obviously consolidate the current products, and have committed to it, but no one really knows when, what and how.
by lincolnit
by loong
LincolnIT is right. Microsoft has been keeping Project Green under wraps. Each of the four serves a different market segment. I am not sure if they wanted to merge it. For the long run, they should. Do they have the resources? I think they do. Do they bother? That's one question they have to answer.
The four products combined to contribute a very small portion of Microsoft's revenue. Will they want to spend more time and effort into another area where the other giants are dominating?
This discussion is closed to new replies.
Trending Software posts
Sort by Trending