Discussion Locked

Open letter to Jack W.

0 helpful
7 replies
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

Jack, I'm writing this on my EEE PC 701. I must admit, the Eee PC has sat unused mostly since I purchased a Lenovo S10. Small keyboard, small display, and limited memory. I've got mine all beefed up with a 32gb SD card and I've got a 32gb thumb-drive I use with it - but it still can't keep up with the S10.

But this whole "keep it by the coffee table" thing with the iPad got me thinking - wouldn't the Eee Pc be really good in this capacity? Awhile ago, the Ubuntu 8.x on it stopped working. I changed my WAP to WPA2 from WEP - and we all know that Ubuntu 8.x was sketchy on wireless,the Atheros chipset in particular,to begin with. So I couldn't get wireless to work, which made it kind of useless as a device. I spent about 10 minutes today messing with it, and decided it wasn't worth the effort, and rolled the dice and did the 9.04 upgrade - hooked up by ethernet. I figured it would kill the whole, highly customized, 8.10 install - imagine my surprise when all the upgrades downloaded, applied, it rebooted, and it came up working beautifully. Even Compiz and the cube were still working - and better yet, the wireless now works with WPA2. You know how skeptical I am about the quality or fitness of Ubuntu in cases like this. I think this is literally a *first* for me as a Linux experience. Upgrading worked flawlessly, didn't seem to break anything that will take weeks of searching to resolve, *and* fixed problems. Amazing.

So, my goal, having that part out of the way, was to be able to use the Eee PC in a similar manner to how the iPad is proposed to be used. I actually use my Android in that capacity quite a bit. I've got TV guides on it, I've got an eBook reader, I can browse sites and follow up on things while I'm watching the tube. (continued)

7 replies

by Member 19291532

I don't trust this not to lose all my work, and this is painstaking work on the Eee Pc... so I'm breaking it into parts.

So, I sat down, with my wireless connection, and decided to start browsing the apps to see what I might install.

eReader - Windows and Mac support. iPhone and Android support - but no Linux support. Strike 1.

How about a TV guide app. I checked out FreeGuide... but FreeGuide seems to require a paid subscription to a non-profit site that provides listings. Bummer. My Android app is a beautiful little package that tells me the Station, the show, the time, and even the station # on my local cable provider. I could use a web based listing guide, but that is kind of besides the point. I wanted a native app. Looks like only one exists, it isn't that pretty, and it has some pretty serious limitations.

Strike 2.

So, we're at the bottom of the 9th with bases loaded, Ubuntu is up to bat, with 2 strikes - I thought I'd come to you.

We keep hearing "It is about the apps", and maybe there is some truth to that. Linux apps, man... they're lame. I'm constantly disappointed. The same app designers who are making quality Android apps should be making those apps for Ubuntu. There is nothing I like more than a platform like TrueCrypt, that works across Linux, Mac, and Windows in a consistent way that is platform agnostic. But when you get to Linux, this kind of app is rare.

It is really a shame, because I *want* to use it... I *try* to use it, but it just doesn't ever seem to be able to deliver.

by Member 19291532

I'll check these out... and I'm not sure this is *not* the case with these two, but I guess I should add a couple of requirements.

The apps should either be in a very easy to download and install .deb format, or available through the Ubuntu package respositories in order to qualify. Preferably the latter. Compared even to Android Marketplace, the Ubuntu package management utilities look dated. It would be nice to have a graphical, reviewed, well sorted Application Marketplace for a mainstream Linux distro...

This, to me, is really all about exploring the best way for Linux to actually make inroads into the consumer OS desktop. It isn't by trying to *mimic* Windows or OS X. Apple's genius lies in this. They've seen that Linux has tried fruitlessly for over 3 decades to crack into this market and failed, because they responded reactively by adding features that made Linux more like competitive OS platforms. Apple goes and makes a device that they hope will make people *dump* their home PCs (at least, for a lot of roles they use home PCs for) - and therefore, they didn't even go with their OWN desktop OS platform. They went with their consumer electronic device OS platform... iPhone OS.

I've been slamming on the iPad left and right... but this is the one industry observation that strikes me. They're not going for uber-geeks. They're going for Soccer Moms...

And Soccer Moms, Grandmothers and the like... they're where you'll grow the home OS market - if it is there to grow. The fact that I'm looking for inexpensive, geek-oriented alternatives shows that there is a certain allure to this idea.

So let's see if the Linux community can get it together and be proactive about going this direction themselves.

by Member 19291532

Then I am a one-woman man, for ethical reasons.

I could install Chrome OS on my Netbook I suppose... but I'm not interested in making any other Linux OS an option for desktop OS development (at this point). Ubuntu currently has the most momentum behind it on the desktop OS scene, so I think the community should rally behind Ubuntu as the choice platform for this kind of application - rather than trying to achieve the goal through cannibalizing market share of other distros (which is how Chrome OS, or even Android, in this application, would work in my mind, at least initially).

I want to see the Ubuntu development community work toward creating alternate "Consumer Desktop OS and Applications" to allow netbooks, including the flood of tablet netbooks that we can assume are coming - to compete effectively with the iPad OS.

Although honestly, I don't think any of the traditional Linux distros currently available will be able to rise to meet this challenge. I'm probably more likely to see Google release something competitive and polished enough to at least begin to compete.

by Member 19291532

I was just thinking about it - and maybe Linux just can't do it, what I'm suggesting here. Maybe it is beyond the scope and reach of Linux - it might even be directly related to the decentralized, non-traditional corporate model of Linux distros.

And maybe getting behind Android is the solution. I read an article on a different site where someone was responding to the iPad saying that Linux netbooks *would* be the "Next Big Thing", and he was putting his money behind Moblin. All you have to do is read the Moblin wiki to realize, "meh". That is the problem. Moblin, Ubuntu, Moblin based on Ubuntu, Android... they're not going to compete with big players, they're going to compete with each other - well, except for Android. Android is the first thing to "get out of the gate" and compete with the big boys. The others aren't even in the race.

But to be successful in this platform, there are a few things that a platform and the platform apps should do well - and we can see those things by looking at the major players.

I'd love to see Android/Google Voice search on my Ubuntu, as a core part of the platform that integrates with other core apps in a universal way. Voice Search works with Google Maps, works with the browser... voice recognition works with dialing. I was using my Eee PC this morning and I was standing, holding it, and using my thumbs to type - and the thought occured to me - "the smallest netbook keyboards may be small and cramped, but they beat a virtual keyboard for thumb typing". So, if you approach it like that - adding as many features that make typing unnecessary is a no brainer. That is what Google has done with Android - and once you get used to the idea, you just open up a voice search and say "tech republic.com" and Google search finds it for you and then you click on the link. Forget trying to type the URL in. Why bother? You can talk to the device. This is underutilized by a lot of Android device owners, but it works great.

Along those lines, a decent free, turn-by-turn GPS app would be a huge boon. I think this one is more difficult unless you're a large corporation like Google that can give away a free GPS app and make money on increasing ad revenue. But there is no doubt that Linux is lacking on this. It can't rely on WiFi to pull down maps, of course - so there are technical challenges with delivering a solution like this. It would sure be nice, though.

Now, a lot of the other big apps for smart devices do not make as much sense for a netbook - especially the social networking apps. I'm not sure you need a Facebook or Twitter app when you've got a full fledged, very usuable web browser - but maybe I'm wrong here. Maybe dedicated social networking apps could be a more pleasant interface for netbook computing than going into the web browser. I suppose these already exist. I guess I'll look into them.

But it isn't just that the apps exist, it is that they are delivered with a core competency that is equal to or superior to the same experience as you would find it on other portable devices (iPhone, Android, etc.) while leveraging the unique abilities of a Netbook.

I think Jason Heiner's complaints about Netbooks result from the fact that a lot of us have been using netbooks in a way that isn't really where their core competency lies. When I think about my positive experience with netbooks, I've mostly been using my netbook... well, like Apple would have you use an iPad.

I take it camping with me, and I tether it to my phone, and I access Facebook - but with a richer, easier to navigate, and easier to interact with interface than a mobile phone can provide. I check e-mail. I'll read tweets. I play some occasional games (mostly emulators of retro titles).

I use it around the house to surf, do the things above, and check out TV listings or to browse in bed before going to sleep for the night without disturbing my wife.

And my favorite netbook is my Lenovo S10 running Win 7... because, well, the S10 has enough power, real estate, and features to run Win 7 well, and Win 7 offers a lot of more polished and refined apps compared to Ubuntu. The core OS itself seems more polished, tidy and organized.

But even Win 7 is lacking because it simply tries to present the full desktop/laptop experience on a netbook.

To be clear, I'm not talking about introducing a crippled "cloud enabled" OS like the one that ships with the Eee PC. They tried that and failed. And I'm not talking about something like the Ubuntu Netbook Remix.

I'm really talking about the APPS. There needs to be a suite of apps, maybe a separate repository, that caters JUST to apps designed for mobile devices, specifically Netbooks. And those apps need to deliver quality and performance equal to or superior to what is available on smartphones and devices like the iPad.

I took a business class when I was a younger man, and the instructor said, "If you're opening a coffee shop, open it RIGHT across from Starbucks - and figure out how to make your store more attractive. Starbucks is going to bring the customers to the block, all you have to do is get them to open your door instead of theirs".

Let Apple and Google bring people to this market, but let the Linux community open up a storefront on the same block. If you manage to steal away just a slice of their businiess, you're probably going to have a pretty lucrative thing going. But you're going to have to offer some value add to draw those customers in. Making your place look and feel a lot like THEIR place is a great place to start - and it is an area where Linux could deliver, if the Linux community got behind the idea.

This discussion is closed to new replies.