RAID 5 v's Disk Mirroring
Can anyone give me a brief summary of the above HD config for a workgroup server.
The server will be supporing a 15 user network and will not have any IT specialist in the office.
Windows Forum
Can anyone give me a brief summary of the above HD config for a workgroup server.
The server will be supporing a 15 user network and will not have any IT specialist in the office.
by azam.quadri
by graemeduncan
Disk mirroring - 2 identical hard disks, if one fails the other can carry on. 2 reads and 2 writes for every access. Therefore can be slow.
Raid 5 - 3 (or more) disks, system writes data on 2 disks and writes a parity check on the last one. If one disk goes the system can continue by working out the missing data from the parity bit. Hardware RAID arrays are usually hot swapable.
The prefered option would be RAID as it is quicker for read/write and more fault tolerant.
by graemeduncan
by garetjax
Good morning. Your question is a little vague but I will guess as to your intent.
RAID 1 (disk mirroring) uses pairs of hard drive to mirror data by writing identical data to each drive. Should a drive fail, the system continues running. The failed drive can be replaced and the mirror restored from the "good" drive.
RAID 5 (disk striping with parity) uses a minimum of three hard drives to stripe data and parity information about files across all drives. If a drive fails, the system continues to run. The "missing" information is generated by using the parity information to calculate the missing bits.
As to which RAID level to use, you need to consider a couple of things:
1. Will the storage capacity of the system need to grow after the initial install. If so, consider RAID5 because the array is easy to increase in size (add one drive)
2. If simplicity is important due to a lack of IT, consider RAID1.
Any other input requires a better description of the planneduse of the system.
Hope this helps.
by graemeduncan
by mckaytech
If you will not have a specialist in the office but will be monitoring the server remotely, I would definitely go for a RAID-5 solution (preferably with hardware RAID that is hot-swappable).
When your monitoring indicates a drive failure, you cansend out a replacement drive and talk someone through replacing it. With a mirror, you usually have to break the mirror and reboot using a fault tolerant disk (if it's the primary disk that fails).
paul
by graemeduncan
by graemeduncan
This discussion is closed to new replies.
Sort by Trending