Discussion Locked

Report: Senior Saudi cleric OKs girls to marry

0 helpful
146 replies
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

I have absolutely nothing to add to this other than to say it's criminal:

By DONNA ABU-NASR, Associated Press Writer Donna Abu-nasr, Associated Press Writer ? 2 hrs 8 mins ago

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia ? Saudi Arabia's most senior cleric was quoted Wednesday as saying it is permissible for 10-year-old girls to marry and those who think they're too young are doing the girls an injustice.

The mufti's comments showed the conservative clergy's opposition to a drive by Saudi rights groups, including government ones, to define the age of marriage and put an end to the phenomenon of child marriages.

"It is wrong to say it's not permitted to marry off girls who are 15 and younger," Sheik Abdul-Aziz Al Sheikh, the country's grand mufti, was quoted as saying.

"A female who is 10 or 12 is marriageable and those who think she's too young are wrong and are being unfair to her," he said during a Monday lecture, according to the pan-Arab Al-Hayat newspaper.

Al Sheikh's comments come at a time when Saudi human rights groups have been pushing the government to put an end to marriages involving the very young and to define a minimum age for marriage. In the past few months, Saudi newspapers have highlighted several cases in which young girls were married off to much older men or very young boys.

Though the mufti's pronouncements are respected and provide guidance, the government is not legally bound by them.

On Sunday, the government-run Human Rights Commission condemned marriages of minor girls, saying such marriages are an "inhumane violation" and rob children of their rights.

The commission's statement followed a ruling by a court in Oneiza in central Saudi Arabia last month that dismissed a divorce petition by the mother of an eight-year-old girl whose father married her off to a man in his 50s.

Newspaper reports said the court argued that the mother did not have the right to file such a case on behalf of her daughter and said that the petition should be filed by the girl when she reaches puberty.

Responding to a question about parents who force their underage daughters to marry, the mufti said: "We hear a lot about the marriage of underage girls in the media, and we should know that Islamic law has not brought injustice to women."

The mufti said a good upbringing will make a girl capable of carrying out her duties as a wife and that those who say women should not marry before the age of 25 are following a "bad path."

"Our mothers and before them, our grandmothers, married when they were barely 12," said Al Sheikh, according to Al-Hayat.

There are no statistics to show how many marriages involving children are performed in Saudi Arabia every year. And it's also not clear whether these unions are on the rise or whether people are hearing about them more now because of the prevalence of media outlets and easy access to the Internet.

Activists say the girls are given away in return for hefty dowries or as a result of long-standing custom in which a father promises his infant daughters and sons to cousins out of a belief that marriage will protect them from illicit relationships.

146 replies

by dadspad

I am kidding, of course. I have a daughter and this is beyond my western thinking.

There are many parts of the world where women, no female, rights are not observed. It is not just the Middle East, but parts of India and Africa. There is not much right about this situation that has existed for centuries. We sometimes forget that it was not that long ago that females were 'betrothed' by their fathers at a very young age, and they had no say so at all.

Women's rights is a very recent, historically, thing. It has only been in the last 150 years (in the US) that real advancements were made.

http://www.wic.org/misc/history.htm

And the world became much richer and better.

by oz_media

In Western Culture and based on the laws on the USA, it is clearly criminal as the law prevents it. Child labour is also illegal in North America, however North Americans perpetuate child labour, and poor working conditions all over the world by demanding more for less from underpriviledged nations.

But that's okay, as long as it is not on your own soil others can treat their workers how they choose. Whatever it takes to fill the WalMart shelves with the cheapest crap is fine.

As the article indicates, it is clearly legal in Saudi Arabia though, meaning that in YOUR society its criminal, but that doesn't make it criminal in another country no matter how morally perfect you deem yourself; unless you feel your laws should be pushed on the world, which wouldn't be new to anyone anyway.

The problem with the current war in the middle east to begin with, is that they feel western culture is being imposed on Eastern residents. Regardless of what YOU feel is wrong or morally acceptable, you are condemning a foreign nation for THEIR laws. Maybe they feel that wearing short shorts and halters in public should be illegal. Perhaps the fact that women wander around with thongs showing out of their skin tight jeans is illegal. But in YOUR eyes that is simply freedom of choice, in YOUR society.

I am sure that if THEY had that same privilege to evaluate YOUR laws, you would not be too amused at how they see you as being too liberal. Yet when it is you viewing THEIR laws, of course your society is correct and theirs is wrong.

Whatever, how typically blind and hypocritical. What you grow up with becomes correct and all else is wrong. However, countries have been pushing the USA to fall into line for decades when it comes to laws. The Us just seems to take longer to adopt changes, as if it is a purposeful disobedience because confirming wouldl mean lack of independence.

When other nations abolished slavery and the US did not comply until many years later, is it right fo rthose other nations to claim that what you were doing with slaves is illegal? Nope. It may be illegal in teh UK or in Germany, but it certainly WAS legal in the US. Should their changing laws have been FORCED upon you at that point?

Americans always seem focused on what others do, without any reflection at all.

by onbliss

My grandmother was married when she was not even a teen, or maybe just around being a teenager. Her sisters got married round about the same age. But these happened more than half a century ago, in India. Times have changed. The government has now minimum legal ages for women to get married. I think it is 18 now.

by jdclyde

who are we to judge child molesters. If child molestation is a part of their culture, we should embrace it.

In parts of the world, sex with children is legal. It is ILLEGAL for you to go from most civilized nations to there for the purpose of being a "sex tourist".

by oz_media

In our society, and most others, child molestation is illegal. The definition of molestation does vary a great deal though. Even withing your own United States, the laws have great differences in the definition and application as well as the punishment.

This simply demonstrates that even your own society is at odds over the issue.

But your sarcastic comment about embracing it is completely off base. It intones that, if we don't oppose something, then we embrace it. What a frickin' ignorant conclusion!

Its like saying "if you aren't with us, you are against us" which is just as ignorant.

You are either left wing or right.

You are either a believer in God or an atheist.

Its all BS to create conformity out of fear of difference. I am surprised that someone as seemingly astute as you are would lower yourself to such primitive and backwards ways of thinking.

by boxfiddler

In this case, I do anyway. Children should be allowed to be children.
Pisses me off.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4038249/

http://www.globalpolitician.com/2532-crime-prostitution

http://www.zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/16843

http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=M1ARTM0012537

http://acr.hrschool.org/mainfile.php/0112/61/

What's the difference between the above decision by the Saudi whoever the hell he is, and what goes on worldwide in the name of pedophilia and the chase for moolah?

etu

by dmambo

But it seems to me that there are some lines that seem morally unambiguous. Murder, theft, rape, child sexual abuse...these things appear to me to be pretty universally condemned and rightly so. I'm no saint, but expecting a 10-year old child to be treated as a "wife" is repugnant. And it's not like it's unconditionally accepted in Saudi society.

Times change, societies evolve. What's portrayed in the article makes me sick.

by oz_media

Bottom line, whether you or I like it or not, its not our argument nor our place to say what we think of other cultures.

"seem morally unambiguous" SEEM is the relative factor here. Its like a bad 'feeling'.

We expect them to adopt or at least accept our culture however we are to be intolerant of their own?

I don't think a 10 year old is ready to be married either. Our modern society also thinks that getting married and having children at age 17 is too young, however when my parents grew up that was the norm, any later and you weren't seen as grown up.

As you say, times change and societies evolve, we just can't judge OTHER societies based on the morals of our own, or else they are free to do the same, which we clearly do not accept either.

by tonythetiger

[i]child sexual abuse[/i]

That hinges on the definitions of 'child' and 'abuse', doesn't it?

We have defined these things for our culture. That is why the thought is abhorrent to us. If the thought isn't abhorrent in another culture, why should it be criminal in that culture?

by tonythetiger

[i]The problem with the current war in the middle east to begin with, is that they feel western culture is being imposed on Eastern residents. Regardless of what YOU feel is wrong or morally acceptable, you are condemning a foreign nation for THEIR laws. [/i]

I can agree... Who has the right to decide what rights people in another country/culture/jurisdiction have?

On the other hand, why is a person beholden to a certain set of laws merely because of the accident of birth within a particular set of borders? Do they have a right to be aware of alternatives and choose one if they desire? Is that knowledge of alternatives grounds for punitive action against the culture/country the influence seems to be coming from?

No point really... just throwing it out there.

by oz_media

I was starting to think 'whats his point'?

Firstly, if you are born in country and raised as a citizen of that country, you are obligated to live by that country's laws.
Don't like it? Get on your camel and go.

Its the same view I have towards American who think they shouldn't pay taxes.

Don't like it, see if another country will accept you or perhaps move to the Virgin Islands, no tax there.

a country and government taking taxes is a lot like a company in that respect.

Lets say I draw in $50,000.00 worth of business on Tuesday. After the cost of stock, I should get the rest, right?

What gives THEM the right to take MY money and use it to pay for a secretary that I don't use, a medical plan that I don't use, the shipper that I don't use? And why, on top of all that theft of my money, does teh boss get more than I do?

For the same reasons your government does, they have overhead and operating costs involved in making the country a safe and prosperous place for everyone, others as well as you.

Do they have a right to be aware of alternatives? of course, we have libraries (which your taxes pay for), computers and all kinds of media for you to learn that the Virgin islands are a tax free haven for foreign workers.

Do you think people in Saudi Arabia don't have access to this info too? This info on the world is not what our enemies oppose, it is the influx of US capitalism and commercialism that has them turning their noses up at our society being thrust at them as the way to live.
In the case of equality and child welfare, it may be a good thing, but in most others it is not. So how do we go about showing them what a free society is like without them seeing the immense corruption they face by adopting it too?

Judge not, lest ye be judged yourself...and all that other biblical crap we spew as if it is right.

by jdclyde

and are to be traded about, it doesn't matter how old they are, right?

Yeah, no wonder people around the world supposedly hate Americans. We think it is wrong and child molestation. Well, most of us do.

by oz_media

And in Canada, France, australia ,Germany, Sweden, The Netherlands etc. its all fine and dandy?

If your comment was correct, the world is hated, not Americans, quit being so self centered.

YOUR problem is thrusting overt capitalism upon the world and sticking your noses in where they don't belong, even though you FEEL it is your duty to do so. Other nations pretty much mind their own business, its the world police facade that is abhorred. people think that if they say okay to you opening one tiny little cell phone store, that you will quickly have WalMart in town too, selling thongs and tank tops to their women and destroying any remaining hope of culture they have, which is pretty damn realistic if you ask me. I know that's what most Canadians see, its no wonder foreign nations do too. You need to show a few decades of humble pie in order to ever be trusted by others.

by onbliss

Most people, of the World, who hate America they do it primarily because of its foreign policies.

by w2ktechman

Traipsing around the world with guns

making friends 1 week, and then turning on them the next cause a better deal came along?

Only providing aid/forces if the country has something we want?

not killing everyone indiscriminately when in combat?

Torture by naked women giving lap dances?

There are a host of others, please be more specific :^0

by boxfiddler

They like to hate because it masks their fear.
They mask their fear because it reflects their mortality.

by dmambo

I'm judging the dictum put forth by this one toolbag of a cleric. I'd be willing to bet that there a lot of devout Muslim men who are as sickened by this as I am. Hell, from what I've read, Joseph Smith wrapped his perversions in the clock of religion, too. But at least it's been repudiated by the church he founded.

by oz_media

Which is exactly why it is not our concern. FLIP side: GWB (only because he's current for now) thinks that women should marry at age 12. Americans across the country think he's an idiot and a kiddie diddler (some truth there anyway).

If Saudi's had ANY opinion to voice whatsoever, you would all say STFU, its none of your business, we don't like the idea either. (Hell even I get that living right above you!)

But when it comes to US judging THEM, its okay as we are US and they are THEM. Double standards.

by dmambo

I'm no country-firster. The invasion of Iraq, IMHO, was immoral, stupid, expensive and purposeless. As I said, my opinion. I'm glad to see the rest of the world protest my govt holding prisoners indefinitely for crimes they might commit. The fact the we have crime rates like we do in the US says there's something wrong with our society. We shouldn't consume the proportion of resources that we do.

None of this changes my belief that it's absolutely WRONG for pre-pubescent girls to be wives. It's a sick f'ing practice. I'm judging THAT more than THEM.

by onbliss

...like you say it is cultural. Nothing to do with Islam or Muslims. Islam actually was influenced by the culture that existed in the regions those days ago.
The thing about Islam is that some folks in it do not want to reform and bring it to current moral standards.

by boxfiddler

if s/he is 'reformable'. Religion ceases to be valid when its God becomes malleable. Why is that so freaking hard to understand?

The thing about Islam is the same as the thing about any other religion. @ssholes use it to perpetrate atrocities. Why is that so freaking hard to understand?

etu

by dmambo

They've been used as soldiers in some countries. It's wrong.

They've been used as slaves in some places. It's wrong.

They've been used as wives. It's wrong.
(I am assuming that "wife" includes sexual relations. If I'm wrong, then I apologize for making that assumption.)

by oz_media

And where was one of the last civilised places that happened 9child slaves and slavery in general), against many years of urging from other nations, which were completely ignored?

The United States of America.

So, who are you to speak about other cultures not following your set of standards?

I'm not condoning it, just pointing out the hypocrisy in chastising them for it.

by tonythetiger

because it's wrong in our culture. I'm sure that there are things we do every day that would be wrong in some other culture. It is no more right for us to impose our view on them than it would be for them to impose theirs on us.

The fact that it used to be acceptable here is also of some import. We are converted. We have come to change our ways. Now there are two types of these converts: Humble and righteous. A humble convert sees the alleged error of their previous ways and makes changes. When asked about it, they reflect on their alleged mistakes and decide that they will personally try harder to do right. A righteous convert realizes the alleged error of their ways, changes their behavior, then sets out to convince others of the superiority of their new point of view, even to the point of trying to use ridicule, physical force, or force of law, to compel others to accede to their view, whether they agree with it or not.

The latter is not far removed from bullying, which I personally dislike. If my ideas are good ones, they will be adopted merely by others seeing the results. I shouldn't have to use force.

by the scummy one

that convert in public while either disobeying or trying to undermine 'rules' which they do not agree with.
Just because society suddenly finds a wrong, does not automatically mean that everyone in the society suddenly agrees, or follows the belief

by oz_media

I don't think I've ever agreed iwth yuo before or thought that you made any sense. I always saw your comments as off-handed comments from left field, just to offer a different opinion and stir some debate. THIS actually makes all the sense in the world, well done!

by jdclyde

on child molestation.

There is not a civilized nation that condones this with a 10 year old child.

It is ignorant to say because it is their belief that it is fine.

There is such a thing as right and wrong.

A 10 year old child is wrong.

How primitive of you to think otherwise.

by oz_media

YOU just equated the two, and yet when it is reciprocated you see the differences? go away.

As for the 10 year old CHILD, we deem that a child in OUR culture, many do not. That's teh whole point here, what WE feel is right or wrong differs from what THEY feel is right or wrong.

So many Saudis oppose it, but does that mean they see the legal age of marriage to be 18? what if it was 15? you'd still have a problem with that because YOUR society, which you deem superior and correct, says so.

Do I think that a 10 year old girls is too young? Yes.

But I was not raised teh same as peope in Saudi Arabia, how do you know you would feel differently if you were in Saudi Arabia? You don't because you have never learned otherwise. Not knowing any better is also the same as being ignorant. If you are ignorant towards another society and culture, how can you possibly hope to judge it? Right, you can't.

No wonder they hate western culture so much; like Christianity, you feel it is the only right and should be thrust upon others or they should be condemned to eternal damnation. Talk about culturally blind.

by onbliss

1) A society will, as it has a right, to determine if other cultures are inferior, different, similar or superior.

2) A society can do something based on (1)
2.1) Maintain status quo - do nothing.
2.2) Adapt from the other society's superior culture
2.3) Influence the other society's inferior culture to reform and adapt.

Some of the points being made here pertain to #1. It automatically does not mean people are opining on #2.

by jdclyde

We should have no comments on "human rights" in China or anywhere else in the world.

Amnesty International should learn to mind their own business, right?

by oz_media

Because there are laws in China and legislative bodies to stop such abuses, however they are ignored.

WalMart has always said that they keep close tabs on who is producing their goods and ensure that the workforce is not exploited in order to feed American's need for cheap crap. One of these so called 'inspectors' was interviewed and said that they show up but don't care what is going on at all and just turn a blind eye, so as not to upset the manufacturer.

The only way Americans can show voice towards that is to stop buying the products produced in such nations, but in the never ending quest to get more for less, that is simply impossible. Seeing as America's most successful retail outlet is 100% dependent on China in order to keep low balling and closing down local retail outlets so they can stay in business themselves, you are perpetuating the abuse withing their labour force.

So yes, when there IS a law that is being broken, and it is mainly due to YOUR influence and YOUR manufacturing demands, yes it IS your business. But that and whether or not another nation feels its marital laws suit a 10 year old are not even remotely CLOSE to being on a similar plane, yet alone the same issue.

To imply its the same just shows an inability to grasp the big picture and offers up a terribly naiive viewpoint!
What kind of a twisted reality must one live in to compare the two and see any similarity?

How do you see poking your nose into someone's laws to be the same as benefiting from the exploitation of someone's laws?

The only way you could compare the two is if Americans were marrying 10 year old Saudi women and bringing them to America legally.

by the scummy one

I went into WalMart not long ago (a few months ago) because the manufacturer of an Aloe drink had a new blend out, only avail at Wal-Mart in my area :(
When there, I browsed a bit and was amazed at how much stuff there was made in USA. So they are not 100% China, they do have stuff from elsewhere.

by oz_media

I know all you see is old Arabs raping children, and yes that may come into play too. I am sure it is not the focus behind such interests though. We are not talking about the legal age for sexual consent, its the legal age for marriage. Though the two may often go together, that is not the focus of the article at all. However I do feel that is one of the reasons it was printed, to show a society that is less developed, to show a society where men are evil doers, to show a society where their morals oppose our own, and to make it easier to ignore the horrific war that you started.

Do you really think that hasn't happened in our own churches?

How about those religious cults that say that having 10 wives is okay? It completely opposes our cultural and social beliefs, however we are not to stop it as it is personal freedom of religion, no matter how whack we think it is.

We are simply the pot calling the kettle black, in this case on moral ground, we we deem fair to oppose as it would be I MMORAL(SP?) not to.

When our borders open to the Garden of Eden, then perhaps we can judge others.

by oz_media

I thought yuo were correcting comething I had said and I had missed the relationship.

by onbliss

Some of them go to India, and "buy" themselves a bride. Young girls are married off to them by their very own parents.

by the scummy one

That is a total separate issue all together. While I pay the taxes, the government here (local, state, and fed) seem to keep increasing it, and then putting programs together just to waste it and then increase it again.
Many of the programs are things that the government should not be doing in the first place (my opinion). However I can b!tch all I want about the taxes -- it is a total separate issue though. Lets just bring up that most of those opposed to the taxes (income) in the US do so because the tax is illegal -- and that is what they believe. This may be true, too, and likely is. This is based on principle, not just an unwillingness to pay.
Also, the feds seem to want to make things better and add taxes for other sh!t, that are mismanaged, however there is no option of ditching the tax.
Ah, you got me going on and on here -- I shall stop now before I get upset.

by oz_media

Most of what the GOVERNMENT does, here and there, is illegal too.

You have two choices though, as we are not forced to live where we do.

Accept that the country has a governing body, that governing body has millions fooled into thinking they are in charge of the governing body, which any sane person knows is utter rot.

That governing body has very legitimate costs of operation, they have some costs which half of the citizens deem irrelevant but the other half deem imperative. Democracy, can't live with it, can't live without it. (rolls eyes)

There are then costs that are completely fabricated, others which are selfishly and privately awarded in an unfair fashion and others still which are pure con games.

You do NOT have control over your government or what your government does, none at all, don't fool yourself otherwise. the bets you can hope for is a government that at least does some of the things you support, as it will change in four to eight years anyway, and perhaps you will disagree with ALL of the next government's choices then, but again nothing YOU can do about it at that point, you do NOT run your government. You simply cross your fingers and hope that you will agree with MOST of the decisions of the one you elected. if someone else's choice wins the election, you will probably not like anything they do and no, there's nothing YOU can do about it, clearly indicating that YOU do not control your government.
This 'people's government' BS is just that, BS to make you feel like a winner.

Okay, so with that all aside, the same goes for taxes. You have no control over what is done, you can voice an opinion and HOPE that your government works towards something that you agree with, but should that happen it is by chance and by fluke, not by your demand.

So we've established that there's nothing you can do about your government's actions nor your taxes and how they area located, unless by luck, coincidence, chance, fluke etc.

So you have but two choices, live in your prosperous nation of winners and mighty war heroes, and pay what THEY tell you to pay in order to remain there without going to jail for your individual opinion.

or

move and hope that the next country's government does more of what you like, spend your money where you feel it should etc.

Why do you think governments with social programs survive? People that live in those nations agree with how the government supports these programs an depends citizens tax money supporting them.

if i didn't think that every citizen should receive equal medical care and opportunity for life, whether they can afford it or not, then I would be in the USA.

Because I don't like the way your government spends trillions on war efforts that I do not support, I live here.

That's the choice you have to change government, move to another.

by the scummy one

was anything added, or just expanded?

In my post I said (basically) the tax is illegal, I can b!tch about it, however I still pay it, and gave an example of those fighting it (opposed by principle because it is illegal).

Basically, it appears all that was done is expanding to much more sentences/paragraph's what I just said.

Sorry Oz, I still feel that for this thread, the tax thing is a separate issue and really holds little relevance here.

by oz_media

I know of MANY East Indians personally that had prearranged marriages, and I mean many if not all of those I know, which is a lot.

But that still doesn't paint a picture of a dirty 50 year old camel jockey raping a child.

In fact, most of the ones i know are educated and well mannered young men, that are simply told who they will marry. It doesn't always have to be seen as an old pervert looking for young meat, that's merely a stereotype painted in North America, again to make us not understand and not care for Middle Eastern men. Anything to make them seem inferior, less developed and uncultured. In fact the Middle East has FAR more culture and tradition than we do.

Thing that bugs me is that so many people view the Middle East as some substandard culture to be frowned upon. In actuality they are more advanced technologically than we usually are in North America, they get better education that we do, they are much more in tune with the rest of the world, and more. These people are not inferior, it is only by pure consequences that we, in North America. Even their economy is stringer than ours these days.

Is it possible we could learn from THEIR culture and morals? Yes, there is a lot we can learn, at least as much as we can teach them about our own.

by onbliss

...in what you want to. This has nothing to do with America. Some old Arab men are known to visit India and get really young girls.

by the scummy one

like Germans crossing a border to get the 8+ yr. old boys and girls from a nearby poor country. Of course, these were just rentals

by jdclyde

is turning your back on a child.

Just because they are from another part of the world, doesn't mean they are not worth anything.

?All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing?

by jdclyde

quick to condemn anything American, and just as quick to defend anything middle east.

Do you really think that there is anything we can learn about getting 10 year old brides that will improve our society?

Ah, that is it. Just one more discussion to see how many buttons you can push, as their is not any defending of this article.

by tonythetiger

[i]Firstly, if you are born in country and raised as a citizen of that country, you are obligated to live by that country's laws.[/i]

Why?

[i]Don't like it? Get on your camel and go.[/i]

Is someone obligated to provide me a camel for that purpose? If so, who? If not, why not?

[i]This info on the world is not what our enemies oppose, it is the influx of US capitalism and commercialism that has them turning their noses up at our society being thrust at them as the way to live.[/i]

One might wonder how this influx of capitalism was ever allowed in.

by boxfiddler

[i]A society will, as it has a right, to determine if other cultures are inferior, different, similar or superior.[/i]

Says who?
Does this apply at the individual (who in plural make up society) level?
If yes, how is it slavery or genocide is 'wrong'?
If no, how is it applied at the general level if it isn't applied at the specific level?

etu

by dmambo

Sheik Abdul-Aziz Al Sheikh, the country's grand mufti, has a very tiny penis.

by dmambo

You're ruining my confidence for gettin' a job lawyerin'. If I can't convince somebody that it takes a sick sumbitch to take a 10-year old as a wife (and as I said elsewhere, I'm assuming that "wife" implies sleeping in the same bed) then I'll never be able to cut it against that Johnny Cochran feller.

by tonythetiger

[i]What's the difference between the above decision by the Saudi whoever the hell he is, and what goes on worldwide in the name of pedophilia and the chase for moolah?
[/i]

In one case someone is openly operating under the rules his culture has set for him. In the other, someone hides in the shadows and sneaks around because he knows what he's doing is wrong.

America is largely a nation of busybodies... Our own laws are fraught with the desire to "control" our neighbors and impose our definition of victimhood onto others. Right and wrong have fallen by the wayside... it's all about what we want you to do or not do.

The ONLY reason it's accepted here is that those who seek to control one thing or other are in the majority here.... and it's a lot easier to bully from that position (at least bullies think so).

by boxfiddler

going on within the child sex trade is among the pedophiles of certain cultures in which that is frowned on. The trade itself is pretty freaking blatant in those places the skulkers go to acquire those children.

Child abuse is child abuse. 'Culturally approved', or not.

by oz_media

So killing innocent citizens is killing innocent citizens, politically dictated or not. Yet you go to war and excuse these horrors towards another's society, whether supported or not. When others stuck thier noses in and said it was criminal, Americans' said "F-U you, are either with us or against us."

I suppose it only works when you feel you are the superior nation forcing superiority upon others, what's that phrase that ALL Americans like to deny? World Police?

Your comments have validity though, when properly applied.

If there was a law in Saudi Arabia that was being abused and Saudis were unable to control it, then we would offer to assist them in thwarting it.

If there is a problem with the government steaking food and resources from the citizens who need those resources in order to survive, we and all of our allies, would be happy to help them topple thier repressive leaders and form another, democratic government, again [b]IF they wanted us to.[/b]

But we can't simply start judging another country's actions and deciding whether it fits OUR moral standards or not Why are OUR moral standards considered superior?

Because WE believe in them and live by them?
Because that's what WE feel is right?

Sometimes, right or wrong, its not for us to change.

I don't condone 10 year old girls being married, that's why I prefer living in our society and with our culture, which I feel suits me and my naturally acquired morals. Had I been raised differently, I am sure I would feel differently about that too.

However, it is neither my place, nor my duty to stop what other cultures do.

If thier society rejects it and thier laws prevent it and it [i]still[/i] happens with them being unable to stop it themselves, then we should be ready to support thier requests for assistance. But to until such a time that the vast majority have shown repression and an inability to change it themselves. Democracy is all about what THEIR people desire, not what WE want them to do.

However it is NOT our right to simply step in and say, 'hey, you ca't do that, it is wrong!'

We don't have that right and no matter how morally obligated you may feel, you are wrong if you think it is our duty or our right to get involved.

That's where you cross the line.

by tonythetiger

[i] The only sneaking around going on within the child sex trade is among the pedophiles of certain cultures in which that is frowned on[/i]

Those people KNOW it is wrong. Knowledge is (or should be) a prerequisite to determining whether or not something is a crime.

Compare these scenarios:

1. I am taking target practice in my back yard. Before I shoot, I look to see if anyone is in the line of fire and see no one. When I shoot, the bullet goes over the target and kills a person behind a bush a half mile away.

2. I am taking target practice in my back yard. As I am getting ready to shoot, I see a person standing a half mile away, but shoot anyway, thinking I'm never going to miss the target by that much. I miss the target by that much.

3. I am taking target practice in my back yard. As I am getting ready to shoot, I see a person standing a half mile away, and I decide to shoot at him instead of the target. I don't miss.

The three scenarios had the same result, a man was shot dead, but should the shooter be treated the same in each case?

[i]Child abuse is child abuse. 'Culturally approved', or not. [/i]

"Child" had different definitions in different cultures. Some define it as the onset of menses in females and the onset of puberty in males. As for "abuse", who defines that? Don't people have the right to define it for themselves? If I go to an S&M house and allow another to have at me with a whip, is that abuse? How about if while walking home from the S&M house someone jumps from the bushes and has at me with a whip? Is that not different? And is not that difference because of MY state of mind? So how, unless you can read someone's mind, do you know that someone is being abused?

by jdclyde

It doesn't matter if other cultures are deviants that believe in child molestation. Who are we to judge?

It doesn't matter about kids in the sex trade or child slavery, who are we to judge?

Who cares about Darfur? If they want genocide, who are we to judge?

I used to feel bad about the entire pathetic world sitting back and allowing genocide in Rwandan, but who are we to judge?

Thanks Oz, you are absolutely right and I feel much better.

But what happens when one of the Saudi perverts comes to the US or Canada with his 10 year old "wife"? Here in the US, he would have to "melt" and assimilate, while in Canada he is not required to compromise his beliefs and can start cruising the middle schools for his next few "wives".

What a world.

by jamesrl

In fact we had a recent arrest of two fundamentalist Mormon bigamists in BC.

But hey why let the facts stand in the way of slamming Canada.

James

by jdclyde

didn't you notice the puddle of sarcasm on the floor under the post?

It IS amazing that anyone can defend gay marriage and then say the Mormons (or anyone) can't have as many wives as they want. But that is another story for another time.

by tonythetiger

between helping those who ask for our help, and imposing our views on someone who didn't.

Of course, we all have the right to voice our views of what is right and wrong, but if someone is happy, or they're not complaining, what right do we have to interfere?

by jdclyde

being forced/sold into marriage?

It all depends on who you ask. If that 10 year old child asks for the help, who is to hear it?

by keighlar

"So how do we go about showing them what a free society is like without them seeing the immense corruption they face by adopting it too?" -- Oz

Truer words were never spoken, Oz. You get on my nerves with your America-bashing, but this country no longer is what it once was nor what it could yet be.

We ARE a pampered, egocentric country as a whole... and keep in mind that to the rest of the world, we are still the baby. They are the adults that have been around a whole lot longer, and here comes this young whipper-snapper that thinks he has all the answers, but is still wet behind the ears. The middle east has BUILDINGS older than our Declaration of Independence.

I spent many years working in and with a company based in Istanbul. Most Americans would be flabbergasted to hear what others think of this culture... and what Oz says is the heart of it... how can they adopt Western Culture (which includes our quickly vanishing freedoms) when immorality, corruption and the breakdown of the family are the fruits of what we have sown? They don't want any part of it.

If we could grow up into an Adult nation with Adult values (not those of a sex-starved teenager), maybe the world would start taking us seriously.

by oz_media

You think that your society has a "right" to "influence the other society's inferior culture to reform or adapt"?

You are kidding with me, right?

The WHOLE issue that they resent with western culture is that it is being thrust upon them and their youth are being 'influenced' to adapt to wetern culture.

What RIGHT do we have to impose OUR culture unpon theirs?

Its not like these people live in boxes and don't get to see western culture on the Internet, the TV etc. If they want it, they will embrace it, which is their problem to accept or reject as a society.

Neither you or I have ANY right whatsoever to impose our cultures, our beliefs and our society on them any more than we would happily accept them doing the same to us.

Now in Canada, being a multicultural country, we do actually allow and accept a certain amount of their culture to be retained when they live here, with the exception of legal matters, as is the case here.

But in the US, you don't even allow imigrants without expecting assimilation.
"They should have to learn English if they want to move here"
"If they don't like our culture and don't want to become American, then they should have stayed put"

This is the sentiment Americans echo all over when it comes to immigrants and cultural retention. 'it aint American, and we don't want it' is the main idea.

Yet somehow, regardless of how you act towards others, others should be subjected to, and you even feel you have a right to, impose YOUR culture and society on others. is that because you deem your own society to be more advanced than thiers and more correct in some warped way?

And yet you fail to accept that that is pure hypocrisy?

by jamesrl

Since he slams Oz for it at every opportunity.

I don't expect it to change.

James

by the scummy one

that there was o eral vote -- or you likely would have had an opportunity to cast a vote yourself -- even though you are in the Brrrr zone

by tonythetiger

is that the same people who claim to be anti-big government are seeming to want one to go in and "force" their point of view onto another country.

by oz_media

And that's something I have always had issue with, I don't know about others. But it is nice to see you offer a logical and well explained opinion, regardless if I agree or disagree.

by oz_media

As do people in all of our nations.

a little girls in Laos, a teenager in Thailand etc. Our own society visits and exploits these people all the time.

We order underage women/wives illegally as if from the Sears catalogue and where do they come from? Thailand, Russia, Laos and other underpriviledged countries that are at our mercy.

That is illegal trade and rightly so, it is against the law in the originating country, it is against the laws of our own and we DO have a right to address it and try to reduce it.

Another nation passing a law or even publicly accepting marriage at a younger age is NOT our business to circumvent.

by oz_media

You are not going to pull that black and white bullsh1t that gets spewed any time someone wants to be shallow and two dimensional, it simply doesn't work that way.

Your very own Constitution was black and white when written, but didn't suit a changing society, thus it is ammended to detail exceptions as there are many instances where an absolute right cannot be granted. Take for instance the right to free speech, it is NOT an absolute right it is a right with a lot of grey area and many exceptions, allowances and restrictions behind it. It is not a matter of right or wrong at all. You are a more sophisticated society that that, or at least I'd like to think you are.

In this case we are not talking about absolute rights either, we are talking about situations that must be addressed carefully and with consideration of all the issues surrounding it.

there's no black and white, right or wrong here at all, I completely and wholeheartedy disagree with your shallow and very inconsiderate comments.

by boxfiddler

It's an absolute reality in which we live.

I made no assertions in relation to what my place may or may not be regarding changing things in other nations and cultures.

My place is in relation to my immediate vicinity, or I would be placed elsewhere.

by oz_media

They warned you about taking the brown acid.

Is an Oak tree not always an Oak tree.

For god's sake, when will Americans stop quoting old comments as if it makes them sound clever? Especially when they don't apply or fit the context in any way at all.

we are nto talking about 'kin oiak trees, acorns, American flags or people raping your families. It is not a matter of what YOU feel is right or wrong, it is not a matter of your business at all.

Funny how nobody is up at arms abotu labour abuse in China, which actually IS illegal and YOU perpetuate it.

But some cleric in Saudi Arabia making a statement (not passing as law) that children of 10 MAY be married, and America is ready to bomb them into submission.

FO with your righteous, do good holier than thou BS, its pure crap and THAT's why the world either laughs at your two dimensional society or simply rejects and fights against it.

You even feel that YOUR police should be able to do their work in OUR country as per YOUR laws? You constantly work to fight against our laws, you arrest our citizens IN CANADA. Who the hell do you reallythink you are? You certainly aren't better than us, you certainly aren't more advaced, more aware, more intelligent than us. You certainly are not better off than us, and yet ou feel that we should adopt YOUR ways? It is such a typical mindset and nobody knows how the hell you get it, you really think your are right in all ways and that your way is the only way and all others should be forced to accept it. Here's reality then, Canadians think you should all f'k off and leave our resources and economy alone. We think that America sucks and should adopt more liberal and more reasonable, sensible and logical laws and morals. We think that building your nation laws and societies morals standards on the premise of Christianity is blind and clueless, that it displayes complete ignorance towards rational thought. We and our other alied nations have a right to change teh way you think, change your laws and yoru moral standards that are nothing but substandard to others. Are we not in our right to do so? I think 'kin NOT!

To top it all off, Americans even think the rest of the world's citizens wish they were in America?! Get a f'in life people! What a bunch of arrogant, pri**s!

by boxfiddler

Miss the point entirely why don't you?

I lived through Woodstock, btw. 'They' were right about the brown acid. :D :D :D

by oz_media

O am not quick to defend anythign Saudi Arabian, with exception of this one specific issue, what else Saudi Arabian have I defended? just one example would be fine, as you have applied your comment in blanket fashion a something I do regularly, one example should be easy to provide.

Now as far as not accepting anything America does; reading the comments here of your fellowmen/women who feel it is your right and your duty to impose your culture and morals upon another nation, its no wodner I oppose the idea. That's the typical American do-good wannabe attitude that the entire world, allies and enemies reject abotu America. You might want to look around, I'm not alone at all.

by oz_media

Your rapid cessation wouldn't be a positive asset in that world; I lived it for years now and had to grow a pretty damn thick skin.
YOu haven't convinced me that sleeping with a 10 year old girl is not wrong, you never needed to.

In our society it is morally wrong, in our legal system it is illegal and receives severe penalty. Even our criminals dont; accept kiddie diddlers in prison. That's the lowest of all forms of life, to us, abusing women or children and we rightly do not accept it within our national borders.

But what Saudi's do with THEIR laws and THEIR morals is NOT our business unless it is being perpetuated by our society or effects our society, end of story. It's not turning your back on someone it's called letting others live their own lives, we are NOT the world police nor can we act like them, even if it is simply when we feel it is in our best interets to police others.

by oz_media

And that means that exploiting workers in third world country is okay then, its not ALL the time just some of the time.

I mean, I know a guy who rapes girls once a year or so, but he's not always doing it,. He's a really good, hard working guy but once a year likes to take one for himself. But that's okay, he sleeps with his own wife most of the time.

>>Of course that is completely contrived for the purpose of making a point, I do not know anyone who has raped anyone and would not sit idly by if I did.

As for made in America, I work with products MADE in America. One is an entire product line that is made in America and sent to China for assembly and distribution. The boxes say American made, but they were shipped as a complete product from China.

There is a HUGE woolen mill in Vancouver which makes denim for much of the world's Levis, Wranglers, etc. Whether its the Gap or WalMart, the denim bolts come from the same place.

They also make tartans, every clan you can dream up, every colour, thickness, pile etc. They ship it all over the world, it will be cut in Scotland, sewn in India and sold back in Vancouver as made in Scotland.

"But the tag says....." sure.

by the scummy one

ceramic items or glass items, with a seal marked made in the USA and another stamp from the American Ceramics Union (or some such thing). I bet they ship everything to china to put in boxes to ship back here?

C'mon, is it that difficult to agree that Wal-Mart isnt 100% made in China?
Ok, how about this -- I think that I saw a tag stating Made in India as well!

Oh, and the Aloe Drink -- made by Fruit of the Earth -- Texas/USA.

by onbliss

...all the time. In India some people like USA attacking Iraq and Afghanistan, because they see someone taking the fight up to Islam. Some in India hate America for precisely doing the same. That is just one example.

by the scummy one

happy with it, not forced into it, or whatever. Maybe a 10 Yr. old marrying another 10 yr. old??
While I still disagree, it is not my choice

by onbliss

Please read what I wrote carefully. I did not say anything about a right, did I? I listed what can or will happen. I did not say a society has every right to do what it wants.

I listed the possibilities....the actions a society will undertake.

by onbliss

I assume that you are referring to my earlier post.

You very well know I am not an American, yet you take my post and slap it on Americans. That is simply not fair on your part.

I have said it several times to you in the past. No you wouldn't accept it, because you had decided that since I live in America all my views are shaped by the American systems. As I said, you will believe in what you want to believe.

Moreover, you even got my post wrong. I did not imply or say anything about a society's right to influence other society. Read my post again.

by oz_media

1) A society will, as it has a right, to determine if other cultures are inferior, different, similar or superior.

no it doesn't , you have the ability to vote for what YOU deem correct in YOUR society, nobody else's

by onbliss

Go easy.....

In my religion, gods all the time make mistakes and reform; or commit more mistakes :-)

by onbliss

A society has the "right" to determine; but I did not say a society has the "right" to any one particular action.

by oz_media

"1) A society will, as it has a right, to determine if other cultures are inferior, different, similar or superior."

So you have a RIGHT to judge other cultures an deem them inferior or superior.

"2.3) Influence the other society's inferior culture to reform and adapt."

okay if that doesn't mean you have a rigt to judge it and influence another country's culture, what does it mean then?

Bottom line, you can judge all you like, but how you see saying you have a right to judge and influence other cultures as not meaning you have the right the right to judge and influence other cultures is beyond me.

You spelled it out, in point form.

by oz_media

"2.3) Influence the other society's inferior culture to reform and adapt."

so you FEEL you have a right to judge others, judge not lest ye be judges yourself.

And you feel that you can influence another society that YOU deem "inferior" to your own.

Is that some form of God given gift that Americans have then?

A right to judge and change another society's culture, well said. seems pretty clear and concise to me, not much grey area. Unless you typed what you didn't actually mean or later realised just how absurd it all sounds.

by onbliss

Let me try one more time.

Yes, I said a society has the right to Judge. But I did not say the society has the right to take a particular action.

If you can not distinguish the nuance there, then I am at a loss for words. I simply do not know how to make you understand. So peace.

by onbliss

Those two are really gem of questions. And I am going to immediately admit that I do not know the answers to them.

Whatever I know about Christianity is that during the last few centuries there were lots of reforms. Hinduism has undergone reforms from time immemorial. There are traditions and practices that look outdated now. Islam is going through these reforms as well, except that Saudi Arabia in particular has been responsible for developing a virulent form in the last century or so.

Civilizations learn from each other. And if I remember some of the things that you have always said here is about how an individual takes responsibility for his/her career and continue to learn and develop all the time right?

by oz_media

I never said ALL WalMart products were made in China. But the majority of China's exports are to the USA. The majority of THOSE items headed for the USA are for WalMart.

And in most cases, when a product is created in America out of multiple parts, it IS cheaper in many cases to send those parts to China for assembly and then ship back to the USA, that's why so many companies do it today.

It is THAT type of low cost labour that is exploitation. Those 'sweatshops' make workers live at the factory, work sometimes in excess of 24 hrs straight and fine those who do not. All to make sure that you can get your kids toys for $0.79 cents less than you can get them at other stores.

You can make pathetic excuses or seek out exceptions all you like, but it doesn't detract from the reality that China's increasing labour repression is due to America's constantly growing need for more cheap sh1t because people want to pay less. You were all scared into thinking the sky is falling and the economy is in dire straights, as economy that spent half a trillion dollars on an illegal war, a county that spent 700 BILLION to bail out bad lenders debts, a country that spent billions more to bail out an auto industry that fails to make a valuable enough car to keep consumers buying from the country's manufacturer's.

But hey, you better support that Chinese import garbage, that 75 cents may put Greg and Donna's department store out of business but that's life, you need to save that money because the country is crumbling, better spend it overseas.

Talk about easily duped!

by onbliss

....when it is simply no point talking to you. Because you are not known for budging.

Leave America out of this, will you? I don't bring Great Britain or Canada into our discussions do I? For the nth time, let me tell you I am not an American. I am an Indian, and grew up with Indian value systems {whatever that is :-) }

Yes, I have the right to judge others. Others will judge me, so what now?