IT Employment

eHarmony enters the HR recruiting space. Should we be concerned?

eHarmony has helped many singles find their way to marital bliss, but can that same algorithm be applied to help people stay engaged at work?

eHarmony Enters the HR Recruiting Space--Should We Be Concerned?

Earlier this year, the dating site, eHarmony, announced it will update its algorithm to be used by employers when hiring. Sure, the company has helped many singles find their way to marital bliss, but can that same algorithm be applied to help people stay engaged at work?

eHarmony certainly seems to think so. In an email interview, Grant Langston, the company's VP of Customer Service, qualified eHarmony's move, saying, "Knowing the positive impact that eHarmony has had helping more than 565,000 people find the right person for them, we thought this was the right direction for eHarmony."

But is this the right direction for the recruiting field? Some have argued that personality testing is a dangerous hiring shortcut, while others have contested its legality. And then there are those that think this is one of the greatest developments to hit the recruiting world since LinkedIn. To understand both sides of the argument, I contacted HR industry consultants and CEOs of companies specializing in career personality assessments to see what they have to say on the matter.

The result: while it's apparent that the experts disagree on the effectiveness of personality assessments in the professional space, they do all agree on one thing--the age of algorithms is changing the way companies hire.

Let's start on a positive note. Perhaps unsurprisingly, Samar Birwadker, the CEO of Good.co--a company that helps job seekers discover employers that fit their personality type--is unflaggingly for personality assessments in the hiring process, saying it could "create better environments for all employees." As Birwadker argues, millennials--a generation that places great importance on cultural fit and workplace happiness--are entering the workforce in droves. With that in mind, using personality as a factor when hiring will become "a useful tool for building more productive, happy teams, and it's going to be especially important to attracting and retaining these younger candidates."

True, cultural fit is a key factor for many new workers, but what about business objectives? Employees aren't hired to be an employer's friend. They're hired to do a job, produce results--a fact that Greta Roberts, CEO of Talent Analytics Corp, argues eHarmony's implied focus on "happy workers" ignores to the detriment of employees and employers. As she says, "In a well run business, people are placed in roles where they perform well, and as a side effect are also happy. Having happy workers, who may or may not perform well, should be a deep concern."

Meanwhile, Dr. Janice Presser, CEO of The Gabriel Institute, expresses yet another possible stumbling block--the difficulty of creating teams. As she says, "eHarmony's personality test has had success in matching one person with a significant other, but matching teams, or entire cultures, is an entirely different matter." Personality testing, or at least the one-to-one matching of individuals facilitated by eHarmony's algorithm, will have to undergo quite a bit of change if it's to be effective at identifying traits in job seekers that map to effective collaborative teamwork and an internal drive to make meaningful contributions to an organization.

So what does eHarmony have to say about all this? Langston argues that the company's entrance into the recruiting world will benefit employees and, employers saying "We believe that with great information from a candidate and great information from a company, better, more compatible employment opportunities can be realized."

In fact, the company is so confident of its updated algorithm's ability to improve lives--personally and professionally--that Langston hints it may continue to expand even beyond the recruiting space, stating eHarmony "will be announcing several new verticals that address compatibility and will help people live better, more satisfied, content lives."

Erin Osterhaus is the Managing Editor for Software Advice, an online resource forHR software buyers. She focuses on the human resources market, offering advice to industry professionals on the best recruiting, talent management and leadership techniques. Her work has been featured on TLNT, Entrepreneur.com, and Yahoo's Small Business Advisor blog, among others. Erin can be reached at erin@softwareadvice.com, or follow her blog, The New Talent Times.

12 comments
kaur
kaur

Absolutely nothing good can come of this scheme.  

pcta-1234
pcta-1234

OK - aren't these the folks who were somewhat anti-gay until too much noise was made about it. Nope not a good company to do screening

casey
casey like.author.displayName 1 Like

Ugh ... to quote D. Fagan - "... a just machine to make big decisions, programmed by fellows with compassion and vision ... ... what a beautiful world this will be ..."


eoschlotz
eoschlotz

wanderer gets it. This is another pseudo-scientific way for HR to look like they are doing something useful while not having to do anything. It sounds like a new improved way to introduce bias into hiring. Whatever happened to "diversity" and "inclusiveness"?

TRgscratch
TRgscratch

@eoschlotz last year's buzzwords

catcha46
catcha46

@TRgscratch @eoschlotz Even if there is a algorithms that says "hey, he is the "supposed" right person for the job", it will still be entirely based on the employer whether he wants to select or not. If this is truly a replacement, where would all the HR gonna work at?

Gennadij
Gennadij like.author.displayName 1 Like

Sooner or later such service will become usial practice, I guess. It may be a first step...

culluding-techrepublic
culluding-techrepublic

eHarmony is weird. I've twice tried to sign up to them but was refused each time. No reason was given and they didn't reply to my emails. They must be quite fussy about who they take on. There were pages of very personal questions to answer. I wouldn't use them for finding a job, nor finding an employee. Rather stick to the experts who are already successful at filling jobs.

meprudden
meprudden like.author.displayName 1 Like

Interesting. In the '80s, I interviewed at a firm that had trouble finding people fitting in with their culture, which was based on a very strong work ethic and perfection-oriented.  They decided to handle this problem by having all new recruits be screened by a psychology professional (I don't remember whether they he was a psychologist or psychiatrist).  I made the grade -- as we technologists know, if things aren't perfect, they won't work right -- and was hired.  Over time, it ended up that while employees were of the same mind, they were driving each other nuts with their obsessive, compulsive perfection.  Sixty-hour work weeks were the norm.  Cultivating a work environment though these means must be done with conscious effort to avoid getting a workforce that is out of balance. 

wanderer
wanderer

There are so many examples of how personality testing fails to predict job performance that even considering using it is laughable. HR is constantly striving to find ways to avoid doing a tough job by using "easy tools." It doesn't work, and yes, I agree with jon.kilcrease that eHarmony does sound disturbingly cult-like. Just what we need: more silos of individuals carefully selected to think alike and exclude all possibility of benefiting from diverse ideas. Welcome to the brave new world of HR.

ppg
ppg

Just checking that i can add comments after the Techrepublic changes

jon.kilcrease
jon.kilcrease

That last quote from the eHarmony individual sounds disturbingly cult-like.