7 replies
by erikdr
Well I don't tend to laugh on the NetWare 3.12 choice (if it ain't broke don't fix it) but by the apparently thoughtless switch between W9x and W2K and then expecting the security caveats to be the same!
In my view, W9x is as unsecure as hell andthe policy to block registry edit for W9x is only a fake; it does block REGEDIT and so on but it doesn't block a program modifying the registry. This is by design by MS, they warn for this. W2K _is_ secure in this sense.
The only valid design with W2K (and NT) to make 'essential'registry changes is by a software distribution system like ZENWorks or SMS, whose agent runs under a service account.
However I wonder whether the changes done in your logon script are of such a serious nature that they require essential changes. There are grades in the W2K policy to allow simple changes in the User hive of the registry while blocking more serious changes and blocking Regedit. Otherwise e.g. IE simply cannot run, it saves quite some settings in the registry while a user is busy. Also there's an alternative way to block registry editing in a granular way in W2K: by setting ACL's on all relevant registry hives.
So in summary:
a) Try to finetune the policy so that the changes in the logonscript (if really needed) are allowed.
b) If that fails, try ACL's (and keep regedit removed, the logon script can use VBScript or so)
c) If all else fails, and the functionality is really needed, try swdistribution like WinInstall (cheapest), ZENWorks or SMS.
Hope this helps,
/ The Netherlands
by paladin46
by carlsgaardp
by paladin46
by bill_beach
by paladin46
by paladin46
This discussion is closed to new replies.
Trending Windows Forum posts
Sort by Trending