Discussion Locked

You "Global Warming" people are .......

0 helpful
22 replies
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

..... (okay, I toned it down.)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=413216&in_page_id=1770&ico=Homepage&icl=TabModule&icc=NEWS&ct=5

It's all about control and higher taxes, people. AND YOU DID IT TO YOURSELVES!

LINK - You ALL deserve THE LINK!

How DENSE can you people be?

(According to my British friends who visit these threads, an insult is not an really an insult, but rather a gesture of friendship. So I call you ________ with all due respect.

22 replies

by Member 25348569

Because if the Good Ol' USA goes on doing nothing about anything, we'll be shooting ourselves in the foot (head?) for no gain at all.

Neil

p.s. Let me try and explain the "insult" thing. British (males) are routinely insulting to their friends and yet scrupulously polite to their enemies. It's been that way for a long time. We do not apply this rule when talking to Johnny Foreigner as he doesn't understand the subtlety of when calling someone a "wanker" is acceptable and when it isn't.

As Johnny Foreigner is - obviously - foreign, when we receive an insult from him, we assume that it is an insult and proceed accordingly.

by gadgetgirl

we hit first, and ask questions later! :p

Neil, update your Yank thread, please - assume you and Mum safe home ok?

GG

by tony hopkinson

being called a wanker is not insulting.

Being called a liberal wanker, well fighting talk.
:D

How was the holiday mate?. You must have biceps as big as your thighs pushing your mum about to see the next interesting feature those colonials stole off us.

by stress junkie

Some years ago I was dating the secretary of a coprorate vice president. One day she told me that she had received a phone call from someone in one of the company's offices in Great Britain. The caller was very upset with the vice president and had said that the vice president was a wanker. It took us a while to figure out what that meant. When we finally discovered the meaning of that expression we had a good laugh about it. :D

by drowningnotwaving

You're a zealot, and that's good because the world needs them.

You just so completely, utterly, by like a billion percent missed the point. Simple as that.

Don't you think the overall message is to watch out for them sneaky politicians, using any excuse they can, to raise taxes?

I mean, have a search on hidden government rulings. Does this really come as a surprise?

Okay the global warming thing adds a lovely little grab for the journo. No doubt.

But seriously Max, can you think of a local city, a state or any Federal government, in any country, on any side of politics and at any time in democratic history that hasn't done the same?

If you can, I'd bet they quit in dismay, got either kicked out at the next election or assassinated really quickly.

Is this your bid for the death of democracy?

Can you be our philosopher king?

by stress junkie

I don't know what you "just seen"[sic] but some time ago I saw a tv show on the same subject. The tv show that I saw reported that the Earth's magnetosphere would grow weaker for the next 3000 years, then the Earth's axial poles would flip their north/south orientation, , then the magnetosphere would slowly regain strength to it's current level.

On the other hand Great Britain is now growing warm weather crops that it has not been able to grow for hundreds of years. Crops like wine grapes and olives are becoming prevalent in Great Britain's farms. That is because Great Britain is having warmer weather for a longer period of time every year than it has received for centuries.

The Arctic ice cap is indisputably getting smaller. Glaciers have melted.

So your flippant remark is ignorant.

by tonythetiger

maybe the extra radiation will ionize some of those stray oxygen atoms in the upper atmosphere and rebuild the ozone layer.

So, how small were the ice caps and glaciers "hundreds of years" ago when the Brits were last growing those warm weather crops? and what caused the cooling afterward that prevented the growing of thse crops?

by deepsand

latch onto any piece of pseudo-scientific drivel that allows to cling to your warm and fuzzy feelings as to how all-is-right-with-the world-depite-mankind's-actions that it makes a rational man puke.

To quote Albert Einstein, "[i]The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.[/i]" Also appropriate here would be Franklin D. Roosevelt's "[i]Repetition does not transform a lie into a truth.[/i]"

When you have some real scientific data, vetted by real scientists, let us know. Until then, just STFU!

by maxwell edison

My point exactly. And the "human caused global warming" claim has been repeated SO MUCH, and by NON SCIENTISTS, that you dupes are considering it truth.

Why don't YOU PEOPLE just ALL practice what you preach and STFU?

by deepsand

The real scientists are in accord; it is the pseudo-scientists who claim that the scientists are wrong.

That would make you either a pseudo-scientist or one who has been duped by them

BTY, still stand by your position that invading Iraq was a wise thing to do? I told you that the whole thing would blow up!!! Eat my dust.

by dfo_rexx

the ecology. My background is earth history (my first MS was in paleontology), and the thing to realize is this: our current climate is actually cooler than about 80% of Earth's history. Global warming will not destroy the earth. The point of global warming worries is not the Earth, it's us.

When (not if) the Earth warms, we will have problems because we humans cannot change fast enough to accomodate the Earth's changes. The issue, as I see it, is not the Earth itself but our place in it.

Higher taxes may not fix it; on the other hand, most people only understand the hit to the pocketbook and not rational arguments. As the main post says, "We are doing it to ourselves and have nobody else to blame." Bummer.

by deepsand

The thrust of his post was that there is no threat, and that any resources spent on defending against such are therefore unwarranted, so that we deserve any resulting burdens arising out of such as punishment for being stupid.

Being Max, the all knowing and all seeing, he feels that he has given us ample warning of the errors of our ways, and that our refusal to accept such out of blind obeisance is just cause for our punishments to come.

All hail Max.

by thechas

Regardless of your personal position on global warming, the root issue of this thread is actually taxes.

The more advanced a society becomes, the more government services the population demands.

Yet, at the same time of demanding more services from government, people also demand lower taxes.

Increasingly, governments are turning to so called vice taxes. There is much less opposition to adding taxes to the cost of goods and activities that many people find objectionable. But not so bad as to outlaw the activity.

We have taxes on cigarettes, alcohol, sex (Nevada), and gambling. Along with "user fees" for hunting, fishing, driving, camping etcetera.

So why not place a higher tax on energy consumption?

Based on recent history in the US, the economy could survive the $3 or $4 per gallon of motor fuel that it would take to significantly reduce consumption.

Heck, with the shape the US auto industry is in, raising the cost of fuel could be viewed as merciful in that we would finish off the Detroit based auto industry quickly rather than the prolonged agony they are going through.

Chas

by deepsand

Their publicly stated position is that they are unable to sell enough more fuel efficient vehicles to have any measurable impact on energy consumption because the public demand for such is too low, owing to the low cost of gasoline.

If, say they, the price of gas is sufficiently raised, via Federal gas taxes if need be, the public will be forced to buy enough of the more fuel efficient vehicles so that they, the manufacturers, can afford to decrease the production of gas guzzlers.

"[i]I believe, I do; I believe it's true. I believe exactly what they tell me to. ... I'm a simple man; I believe.

Politician, just the other day, said he really did'nt want this job; but, he would try to do his very best for me, if I would simply put my trust in him.

And, I believe, I do; ....[/i]"

Tom Paxton

by tonythetiger

the people who use the most energy are the people who can least afford for its cost to go up (older cars, less efficient homes). The number of "needy" will rise, and taxes will be further increased to provide for the needy, which will put more people into the "needy" category. Talk about a snowball becoming an avalanche!

by tonythetiger

Name one group of scientist who said definitively that "Humans are the cause of global warming".

by deepsand

FYI, Max is [b]the superior intellect[/b] here present; or, at least, that's what he tells us.

This discussion is closed to new replies.