Regardless of your personal position on global warming, the root issue of this thread is actually taxes.
The more advanced a society becomes, the more government services the population demands.
Yet, at the same time of demanding more services from government, people also demand lower taxes.
Increasingly, governments are turning to so called vice taxes. There is much less opposition to adding taxes to the cost of goods and activities that many people find objectionable. But not so bad as to outlaw the activity.
We have taxes on cigarettes, alcohol, sex (Nevada), and gambling. Along with "user fees" for hunting, fishing, driving, camping etcetera.
So why not place a higher tax on energy consumption?
Based on recent history in the US, the economy could survive the $3 or $4 per gallon of motor fuel that it would take to significantly reduce consumption.
Heck, with the shape the US auto industry is in, raising the cost of fuel could be viewed as merciful in that we would finish off the Detroit based auto industry quickly rather than the prolonged agony they are going through.
Chas