General discussion
April 30, 2007 at 04:32 AM
robertwilsonjr

Most Naming Conventions Are Short-Lived

by robertwilsonjr . Updated 19 years, 4 months ago

I over saw an R&E Technical Computing Environment grow from two APPLE LISA computers running floppy-net to an international organization. We tried most of the naming conventions listed here at at one time or another and regretted using each one within a year.

Our environment was by nature, very flexible as design/drafting assets were assigned and reassigned; as new and more powerful workstations and servers were added to our asset list and older units were farmed out to areas waiting for their first computers.

We settled on a two alpha digits for the city; two alpha digits for building; two numeric to keep a count. Everything else was managed from the asset management software – providing us with a central location for all computer related information and allowing us the flexibility to move units to where the greatest need happened to be at the time.

This discussion is locked

All Comments