9 replies
by nd_it
by lynbor
Incremental backups are fast, but that's because you are only backing up what has changed since the last full backup. That means, to restore after a disaster you need to restore from the full backup first and then from each and every incremental backup since the full. If any of these tapes refuses to restore, you will lose data.
My thoughts are "Tapes are Cheap" so buy more tapes and do full backups every night. Take one tape out of service each week or month or quarter and take it offsite. I prefer a 10 tape rotation. That gives 2 weeks of full daily backups to restore from and then your offsite tapes are for restoring very old data should the need arrise.
Right now for the lower end server based backup solution we are recommending DAT drives and tapes. The drives are fairly reliable and the tapes are very inexpensive compared to other solutions. The drives are a little pricey though and they are SCSI, so you would need an SCSI interface in your server. We also like Veritas' Backup Exec for either Netware or NT. Arcserve is also a good backup program from my experiences.
by packratt
Well, where software is concerned it does depend on what platform(s) you are backing up. I have most of my experience in mixed environments where each system sometimes requires different solutions since no one package supports them all. Typically you will see Microsoft/Novell NOS mixes and there are two main packages available, Computer Associate's ARCServe and Veritas Backup Exec. ARCServe is the defacto standard in that you see it in a majority of environs, yet it's support is difficult and it's implementation is problematic. I have yet to use Backup Exec yet a majority of what I hear from others that do use it in similar environments is quite favorable, so much so we are about to try it out in our testbed as a possible replacement for ARCServe.
Hardware really depends on how much you are backing up and your budget. DLT Libraries are the defacto standard here in that they are relatively fast as far as tapes go, they have good storage space, and they are available in "tape libraries" when your full backups require more than one tape. One caveat is that if you use any compression on your data storage then expect the low end of the advertised scale of tape storage when making the choice.
As for methodology, (differential, incremental, full, rotational, etc...) Your choice there is likely supported no matter what package you use and is dependent on size of backups, time required to backup, tape storage methods, disaster recovery plans, budget, and some part personal preference... This is, as you might be able to tell already, a different topic alltogether...
good luck, and let me know if you have other questions.
by isys
Are the sites separate or part of an enterprise? What are you going to back up? How much? Will the system shut down for the backup? What is your budget? What is in place already? Some generic info:
http://www.lanscape.com.au/Support/backup.htm
http://www.acn.purdue.edu/docs/sysadmin/backup/strategy.html
http://www.zdnet.com.au/newstech/security/story/0,2000024985,20262447,00.htm
by dlswingle
by ncodrut
Recently we bought a HP Dat unit drive, who have a new tehcnology implemented. It is called OBDR (One Button Diaster Recovery). Check HP home page for details. The software shipped with the unit is Yosemite TapeWare, not a very good piece of app, but it knows OBDR implementation. With this, you can back-up entire system structure (partitions, filesystems, OS, apps ...) and restore it with one button click (nice, isn`t it ?).
In addition, we use ARCServe Backup for the database and users files.The backup method is up to you (regarding amount of space needed, backup time, etc.)
So, in case of system crash, we restore system files (OS, apps...) with OBDR technology. It takes about 2 hours (we have WinNT/Oracle Server, plus other tools&stuff). We have a specific tape for backing up this part of system.
Then we restore userfiles (the backup software is already restored :-) thanx to OBDR).
It shouldn`t take more than a half`o`day to restore the entire system. :-)
In addition we use ARCServe Replication for data availability on a secondary server in case that primary fails.
good luck on your backup strategy ... :-)
by ncodrut
Recently we bought a HP Dat unit drive, who have a new tehcnology implemented. It is called OBDR (One Button Diaster Recovery). Check HP home page for details. The software shipped with the unit is Yosemite TapeWare, not a very good piece of app, but it knows OBDR implementation. With this, you can back-up entire system structure (partitions, filesystems, OS, apps ...) and restore it with one button click (nice, isn`t it ?).
In addition, we use ARCServe Backup for the database and users files.The backup method is up to you (regarding amount of space needed, backup time, etc.)
So, in case of system crash, we restore system files (OS, apps...) with OBDR technology. It takes about 2 hours (we have WinNT/Oracle Server, plus other tools&stuff). We have a specific tape for backing up this part of system.
Then we restore userfiles (the backup software is already restored :-) thanx to OBDR).
It shouldn`t take more than a half`o`day to restore the entire system. :-)
In addition we use ARCServe Replication for data availability on a secondary server in case that primary fails.
good luck on your backup strategy ... :-)
by trb
This discussion is closed to new replies.
Trending IT Employment posts
Sort by Trending