Exchange server, RAID 1 or RAID 5??
which one you recommend, iknow raid 1 is good for writing, and raid 5 sucks at it, but
raid 5 is better for reading, which raid 1 is not so good at...
but exchange server is read and write... any suggestions?
Networks
which one you recommend, iknow raid 1 is good for writing, and raid 5 sucks at it, but
raid 5 is better for reading, which raid 1 is not so good at...
but exchange server is read and write... any suggestions?
by douglasemc Accepted solution
by cg it Accepted solution
Mirrored affects performance because data is being written to 2 drives.
If your sending out lots of emails, stick with performance plus security.
by kjell_andorsen Accepted solution
I don't know what kind of load your exchange server is going to experience or what your environment is like, but in an ideal situation I would recommend the following outline.
First, keep OS, transaction logs and Exchange database files on different arrays. This will greatly improve performance
For the OS I'd recommend RAID 1
For the Transaction logs I'd use RAID 1 as well, with a different set of disks.
For the Database files I'd use a separate RAID 1+0
Of course, this is the ideal situation and may not be available to you. You might want to check out Microsoft's storage guidelines for Exchange available at http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb125079.aspx
by douglasemc Accepted solution
by oh smeg Accepted solution
RAID 1 will be way too slow and the system will lag badly.
Col
This discussion is closed to new replies.
Sort by Trending