5 replies
by slconsultingsvc Accepted solution
by jdclyde Accepted solution
Another big issue, how many systems have similar hardware? If it was only a few images to maintain, it wouldn't be to bad. If they are all different....... Charge by the hour.
Remind them if the older systems have a hardware failure, they will be hard pressed to get them going on new hardware because of driver support.
by slconsultingsvc Accepted solution
I agree with you that there is really no good answer without replacing hardware. These are all control systems for very large machinery and the manufacturer charges a pretty extraordinary fee to come in and set the software up on the new hardware. They actually want to sell them their own box which I am not gonna let happen. Its like $14,000 a PC and I have already seen it get installed on a E machine there so I know it can be done.
Bottom line you are correct that if the hardware goes bad having a drive backed up isn't really the answer. I am thinking of pitching something to the effect of replacing all of the hardware with identical devices and having all of the them networked and saving images up to a remote server. We could then keep a couple of spare boxes around to handle a hardware outage depending on the criticality of the machine.
by robo_dev Accepted solution
http://www.acronis.com/backup-recovery/advanced-workstation/
Symantec NetBackup 6.5 has a workstation option, plus Ghost, or Kace have some solutions that are all good.
by slconsultingsvc Accepted solution
This discussion is closed to new replies.
Trending Windows Forum posts
Sort by Trending