Image: LightFieldStudios/Envato
Australian lawyers warn workers against relying on ChatGPT to draft workplace claims as AI-generated submissions raise accuracy concerns at the Fair Work Commission.
Australian employment lawyers are warning workers to be cautious when using generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT to draft workplace claims, after a rise in submissions that appear to have been generated by AI.
Legal professionals say some claims filed during employment disputes contain factual inaccuracies or fabricated legal references, raising concerns about the reliability of AI-generated documents in formal legal processes.
The issue has surfaced in matters progressing through the Fair Work Commission, Australia’s national workplace relations tribunal, where lawyers say poorly constructed AI-assisted submissions can undermine otherwise legitimate cases.
As workers experiment with AI tools for drafting and research, some are turning to platforms like ChatGPT to prepare documents for HR processes or legal disputes. The trend underscores a broader shift in how generative AI is being used across workplaces, often outside formal organisational oversight.
For technology leaders and organisations, the episode illustrates a growing challenge around AI governance and responsible use in the workplace. While generative AI can accelerate writing and information gathering, experts caution that the tools can still produce inaccurate or fabricated outputs if used without verification. As generative AI becomes embedded in everyday workflows, companies are increasingly considering acceptable-use policies and training to guide how employees use AI tools for professional tasks.
On a broader note, the situation reflects the rapid normalisation of generative AI in knowledge work. As adoption expands across the Asia-Pacific region, organisations are balancing the productivity benefits of AI with the need for clearer oversight of how these tools are used in professional contexts.
