5 replies
by rulds
by ebob
I agree about avoiding ME. I have too many problems with a WinME box to think it is right. Specifically? IBM Ispirati with OEM WinME cannot run Micro$oft Age of Empires, without crashing the computer (BSOD or total lockup), unless I disable the Micro$oft supplied sound driver. Ever tried to play AoE w/o the sound? M$ support? don't make me laff! IBM support? They went to the same school: "So don't play that game."
Win2K IS great, but there are so many applications, mostly games, which will not run in W2K. I am glad I have 4 computers at home: W2K for most of my "work", Win98 for gaming and the kids' email (2x), and WinME for my wife's email and a bit of word processing.
My advice to you: stick with 98. From time to time, rebuild yoursystem. Wait for XP and see if ti will truly support the legacy apps, unlike W2K.
by nsantos
by timmitchell
nsantos, I have to disagree about the stability of Win98 being the same as WinME. I have supported Microsoft operating systems for some time now (including ME) and I have never been faced with a more unreliable piece of software. It's more buggy than Win95A. It does have some cool tools that Win95/8 didn't have, but how much good is a system recovery tool if you're going to recover a buggy OS?
JD, I would stick with Windows 98. If you want to learn the latest technology (Win2000), pick up an upgrade disk for about $100. Now, when asked, DON'T upgrade your Win98 installation; you'll want to install Win2K as a fresh install so you'll still have your Win98 platform for gaming and legacy apps.
Hope this helps. Enjoy!
This discussion is closed to new replies.
Trending Desktop posts
Sort by Trending