18 replies
by darthtanner Accepted solution
by oh smeg Accepted solution
The Copy To option in XP will do this and it should move a 2 Gig File in less time than 10 Minutes depending on the speed of the computer and just how fast it can write to the actual Memory Card.
But maybe I'm missing something quite obvious here.
Col
by darthtanner Accepted solution
by oh smeg Accepted solution
Is it open the Image and manipulate it then save to a SD Card?
Or is it a straight copy to a SD Card?
Under XP if it is correctly setup you can do a straight copy to the SD Card after inserting it into the Card Reader or a Plug In USB Card Reader. Of course if you only have USB and not USB2 the file transfer will be slower as the Port is slower but even still a straight copy would be reasonably fast something like 1 to 2 minutes with USB 2 and with USB about twice as long if not slightly longer, this all depends on the hardware.
If you want to open the file in a Application and then save it to a SD Card that is a different story and the time taken to save it that way can be longer as the Program has to convert the image file and then send it to the SD Card. This takes longer because there is Software involved and conversions are taking place.
As for software this depends on your environment and if you have a Server as that would render several Free Apps unusable which are made for Home Users, in a Work Environment you should use Professional Programs but for a domestic Environment there are quite a few Applications available as stripped down commercial applications which the makers make available for Domestic Use.
Col
by seanferd Accepted solution
by darthtanner Accepted solution
by seanferd Accepted solution
If not, just copy the files, not an image.
You can use rawrite to burn an image if you need to.
http://www.chrysocome.net/rawwrite
"a program that will take that image"
What format of image?
by darthtanner Accepted solution
by oh smeg Accepted solution
You want to create the Image File with a piece of Software and output it to the SD Card. The problem here is that the time taken to write it to the SD Card isn't a function of the copy process it is to do with creating the IMG File. The actual copy process will take very little time but creating the actual IMG File is the time consuming part of your Process.
Is it necessary to create this file for every SD Card you need to make? If it isn't necessary it is possible to create the Image File on the HDD and then copy it to the SD Card far faster. Even if this needs to be done in batches of several SD Cards at a time it is possible to create the particular file and output it to the HDD and then make x Number of copies to different SD Cards far faster by just coping the SD Card. Of course if these are one offs then you have a problem as it is not the actual copy tot he SD Card that is time consuming by creating the Image Itself.
Col
by darthtanner Accepted solution
by older mycroft Accepted solution
Perhaps the cards you are using at present are of a fairly old design?
Also - don't forget that SD Cards have a finite capability for read/write - NOT size of file being written BUT number of times the card is written to!
(particularly if you CONSTANTLY overwrite). ;)
by seanferd Accepted solution
Before copying?
Are your XP boxen running a lot of other stuff during the transfer? Do they have less powerful hardware than the Linux boxen?
Perhaps try rawrite once and see how it goes.
by darthtanner Accepted solution
by older mycroft Accepted solution
Because you keep saying that the .IMG file is just like an .ISO except it's not for a CD it's for an SD card.
It's just that you mentioned further up the thread that these cards mainly only have the initial files on them - so why not just overwrite the existing files??
You don't have to create an image file of 2GB just because it's a 2GB SD Card. They're more like floppies except not quite as big, and don't spin round, and don't make good beermats.
Have you tried checking how long it takes to COPY the files, NOT an .img file?
by oh smeg Accepted solution
The OP says that they have the ING File made and it takes a very long time to copy the File stored on the HDD to the SD Card but if they use Application XYZ it only takes a few minutes so I'm lost here as to what exactly it is that they are doing.
Something as simple as a Straight Copy to a Card in a Card Reader shouldn't take that long unless there is something very wrong going on here. Or I'm missing something so Blurringly Obvious that I'm unable to comprehend what it is that is going on here. ;)
Col
by older mycroft Accepted solution
If as you say, the file is primarily downloadable - why not leave it virtual?
[i]You see, lack of information tends to lead to these silly (but sensible) suggestions.[/i]
by rob miners Accepted solution
by seanferd Accepted solution
rawrite dd for windows
If you were already using dd for windows, try increasing the block size.
Otherwise, is that other app doing what you want? That is, is the problem solved?
This discussion is closed to new replies.
Trending Software posts
Sort by Trending