Discussion Locked

Establish a baseline for defining disaster levels

0 helpful
1 reply
Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

Has your organization developed a baseline for defining disaster levels? Do you agree with Mike Talon that defining disaster levels helps bolster DR planning? Share your comments about establishing a baseline for defining disaster levels, as discussed in the Jan. 4 Disaster Recovery newsletter.

If you haven't subscribed to our free Disaster Recovery newsletter, sign up today! Click this link to subscribe automatically:
http://nl.com.com/MiniFormHandler?brand=techrepublic&list_id=e061

1 reply

by wrlang

Yes, its good to have levels defined for the seriousness of any event that may happen. But level 1 - 3 in many cases may not be considered a disaster, they would be handled by crisis/problem management teams. It all depends on your companies implementation of problem/disaster management.

BCP/DRP sometimes has difficulty finding the right niche at companies.

Some put BCP/DRP squarely in the problem management area. This usually happens when a company has a limited problem management capability after starting a BCP/DRP initiative.

Some put BCP/DRP as a separate process initiated by problem management when the event escalates to some previously determined business impacting state. This second implementation usually occurs when BCP/DRP is added to an already well established crisis/problem managment process.

This discussion is closed to new replies.