Software

Ask something
Discussion Locked

Why you shouldn't rely only on remote availability

0 helpful
2 replies

by debate

Closed to new repliesThis discussion is closed. It stays readable, but it takes no new replies.

Do you agree with Mike Talon that organizations shouldn't rely solely on remote availability solutions? What other reasons can you offer why this isn't a good idea? Share your comments about the risks of relying on remote-only solutions, as discussed in the Feb. 22 Disaster Recovery newsletter.

If you haven't subscribed to our free Disaster Recovery newsletter, sign up today! Click this link to subscribe automatically:
http://nl.com.com/MiniFormHandler?brand=techrepublic&list_id=e061

2 replies

by bboswick

I am currently working towards converting to a remote backup solution and would appreciate any comments. I am not particularly fond of the idea, but my boss wants to eliminate managing the tapes.

by wxtomb

Assume that the primary server is developing a hardware problem (perhaps memory) and is starting to incur random, intermittent errors. These database errors will be propagated to the remote backup.

This discussion is closed to new replies.