Google Play Scam Apps Hit 7.3M Downloads with Fake Call Logs

Google Play Scam Apps Hit 7.3M Downloads with Fake Call Logs

Google Play Scam Apps Hit 7.3M Downloads with Fake Call Logs

Generated with Google’s Nano Banana 2.

ESET found 28 CallPhantom scam apps on Google Play that promised fake call logs and had reached more than 7.3 million downloads before being removed.

Verfasst von
Liz Ticong
Liz Ticong
May 8, 2026

A Google Play scam sold users the fantasy of peeking at someone else’s call history. The records were fake, but the payments were real.

ESET Research said it found 28 fraudulent Android apps, collectively known as CallPhantom, that claimed to retrieve call logs, SMS records, and WhatsApp call history for any phone number. The apps had been downloaded more than 7.3 million times before Google removed them from Google Play.

The case is a reminder that scam apps do not need sophisticated hacking tools to reach users at scale. CallPhantom relied on a familiar app-store setting, an invasive-sounding service, and a payment prompt.

How CallPhantom turned curiosity into a scam

The app names did much of the work. Listings such as “Call History of Any Number” made the offer instantly understandable, packaging access to private records as a simple mobile utility.

Screenshots helped sell the illusion. In one Google Play listing, the app appeared to show call-history results as proof of functionality, but ESET researcher Lukáš Štefanko, who uncovered the fraud, said the records were invented.

“Unsurprisingly, our analysis showed that the ‘call history’ data provided by this app is entirely fabricated,” Štefanko said. The app generated random phone numbers and paired them with fixed names, call times, and call durations embedded in the code.

The listings also had warning signs in plain view. Victims left negative reviews accusing the apps of scamming them, while some glowing reviews appeared to be fake. The store pages had just enough polish to make the scam look worth trying.

Users paid for info the apps never had

Some CallPhantom apps teased users with partial results before asking them to pay for the full history. Others asked for an email address where the records would supposedly be sent, but payment still came first.

ESET found three payment paths across the apps. Some used Google Play subscriptions, while others routed users through third-party apps that support UPI, a payment system used mainly in India. In some cases, the apps embedded payment card checkout forms directly inside the app.

Google Play subscriptions were canceled after removal, but outside payments were harder to reverse. Google could not cancel or refund those purchases, so users had to contact their payment provider or the app developer.

Advertisement

Charges varied widely. The highest requested price was $80, while the lowest subscription tier averaged about €5.

More Google coverage

A few titles drove millions of installs

A small group of apps carried much of the total:

  • Call history : any number deta: 3M+ downloads
  • Call History of Any Number: 1M+ downloads
  • Call Details of Any Number: 1M+ downloads
  • Call History Any Number Detail: 500K+ downloads
  • Call History Of Any Number: 500K+ downloads

Several others reached the tens or hundreds of thousands, making the campaign broader than the top five listings alone.

The reach also had a regional pattern. The apps mainly targeted Android users in India and the broader Asia-Pacific region, with many preselecting India’s +91 country code.

CallPhantom’s trick was making an impossible service look ordinary. No legitimate Android app can pull someone else’s private records on demand, and any app that says otherwise is selling the scam before the payment screen even appears.

Also read: Rumored Android 17 features suggest Google is preparing a more ambitious release than a routine OS refresh.

Liz Ticong

Liz Ticong is a technology writer specializing in artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, software reviews, and emerging business technologies. With more than a decade of professional writing experience and over five years contributing technology content for TechnologyAdvice, she helps readers understand complex technologies and evaluate the tools that best fit their needs. Liz has extensive experience researching, testing, and analyzing software platforms, AI tools, and technology solutions. Her work includes in-depth software reviews, buyer’s guides, product comparisons, and technology news coverage designed to help businesses make informed purchasing and implementation decisions. She regularly evaluates AI applications, automation tools, cybersecurity solutions, and business software, providing practical insights based on hands-on testing and research. In addition to her work with TechnologyAdvice, Liz has contributed technology content to leading industry publications, including eWeek and TechRepublic. Her background in technical writing and software analysis enables her to translate complex technical concepts into clear, actionable guidance for both business and technology audiences. Liz holds a bachelor's degree in Broadcast Communication from the Polytechnic University of the Philippines and continues to expand her expertise through ongoing education in artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. Through her writing, she helps readers navigate a rapidly evolving technology landscape with practical, research-driven insights and real-world product analysis.