Another hidden skeleton in the closet!

I fully understand the concept and reasons for de-fragmenting, but when it came to NT, I quickly realized that, you just had to be more versatile rather than depending on NT defragmenter. The net has a track record of Executive Software?s 1995 defragmenter version.

Bad practices:
- Partitions are generally too large.
- Insufficient planning of disk partitioning.
- Users do not have good practical guides to software installation and data file storing
- And we all think that NT file systemand defragmenter will solve the issues as I see posted.

I'll post some revelation information that we have all forgotten. Or maybe with the likes of GuruOfDos still around, NT defragmenter by far cannot achieve optimal de-fragmentation, unless certain elements where considered right at the start of the disk partitioning.

Do not hit your heads against the wall; simply ask MS how differently is XP handling de-fragmentation over its NT 4.0 defragmenter version.

TSP